Tiger Lake Performance and Products

For Tiger Lake, Intel has made some substantial changes over its previous Ice Lake design. If you’ve skipped to the end of this article without reading the pages in between, then in my opinion you should know that new 10nm SuperFin is what I would consider one of the big talking points.

SuperFin and Willow Cove Frequencies

Intel has done away with the 10+ and 10++ naming, and 10nm SuperFin (10SF) has replaced 10+.

It is called SuperFin because Intel has refined its next generation transistor fins and the metal stack in its manufacturing in order to enable a wider range of performance and efficiency compared to the base 10nm process. What this means is that Intel claims that at the same power as Ice Lake, Intel shows Tiger Lake as having a +10% frequency uplift, going from 4.0 GHz up to 4.5 GHz. Not only this, but because the new 10SF allows a wider range, when the core is pushed, Tiger Lake should move within a hair of 5.0 GHz.

That would be a +20% direct frequency uplift in peak performance, bigger than a traditional intra-node manufacturing update, before we even talk about any microarchitecture improvements.

On the core design front, comparing the new Willow Cove core to the Ice Lake core, we have very few changes. Most of it is identical, except for the L2 cache (+150%, now non-inclusive) and the L3 cache (+50%) getting bigger and new memory security measures being implemented. Intel has quoted that it went after frequency rather than IPC, as +20% frequency is more akin to a node change in performance, whereas chasing IPC in this product would not have produced the same change. As it stands, we predict a small single digit uplift in IPC. We will have to wait until the next generation product to see IPC increase again.

Xe Graphics

Tiger Lake will also be the launch vehicle for Intel’s Xe Graphics strategy. Onboard we get 96 Xe-LP execution units, up 50% from 64, running at a frequency at least 50% higher, at 1600+ MHz.

Intel is advertising the graphics performance increase over Ice Lake of around 2x all-in. Tiger Lake supports not only DDR4-3200 and LPDDR4X-4267, but LPDDR5-5400 as well, which will be good for 86.4 GB/s of bandwidth that would be great for the integrated graphics. Though it should be noted that laptop vendors aren’t jumping on the LPDDR5 bandwagon immediately, as prices are high and volumes are low / going into smartphones. LPDDR5 is going to be more of a mid-cycle update for Tiger Lake.

The Rest

On top of performance, Tiger Lake also expands its IO and Display capabilities, enabling Thunderbolt 4 natively, as well as four 4K displays and support for AV1 decode among other things. Intel states that TGL supports PCIe 4.0, and the amount of lanes will scale with core count (numbers point to an 8-core Tiger Lake in the future). Intel didn’t go into lane counts, but based on a number of pointers on Intel’s slides, we believe the four core version of the chip has a 4.0 x4 link.

The official launch for the Intel’s 11th Gen Core Mobile processors (Tiger Lake) is going to be on September 2nd. At that time we expect to see some of Intel’s OEM partners showcase product designs ahead of Q4 launches in time for the holiday season.  There are still a number of questions on the chip, Intel’s ability to manufacture it, how it will compete against AMD, and so forth, which we expect to learn closer to that time.

Tiger Lake on 10 W to 65 W CPUs

As a final thought – one of the first comments made by Intel as part of our briefings was that the Tiger Lake design is going to be scalable, from 10 watts to 65 watts. The current processor we know about today is a four core processor at 15 watts. We’ve already surmised that Intel is preparing an eight core variant, with double the L3 cache, which we suspect to go up to that 65 W mark - however there is a question of where that product would end up. Traditional mobile processors tend to have a ceiling of 45-54 W TDP, and the 65 W space is usually reserved for desktop / socketed processors. Intel previously launched 65 W versions of its Broadwell mobile CPU on the desktop in 2015, and I wonder if we might see something similar here, which would enable Willow Cove, 10SF, and integrated Xe-LP on the desktop.

 

All of our information today came from Intel’s closed door Architecture Day 2020, held less than 48 hours prior to when this goes public. Aside from my article on Tiger Lake, and Ryan’s article on Intel’s Xe Portfolio, a number of other topics were covered, which we’ll dive into over the next few days.

Tiger Lake IO and Power
Comments Locked

71 Comments

View All Comments

  • anonomouse - Friday, August 14, 2020 - link

    A Lot™
  • psyclist80 - Thursday, August 13, 2020 - link

    This close to launch and no benchmarks? hmm, seems suspect. I do hope they got the kick in pants they needed to make a jump in performance needed. Looking forward to apples to apples reviews!
  • eek2121 - Thursday, August 13, 2020 - link

    Benchmarks will likely land on launch day.
  • Martimus - Thursday, August 13, 2020 - link

    You accidentally posted the wrong slide for the third slide on the "What is in a Willow Cove Core?" page.
  • LiveWell - Thursday, August 13, 2020 - link

    Are they incorporating Mears Silicon Technology into their chips?
  • drexnx - Thursday, August 13, 2020 - link

    I guess after "enhanced super fin" they can always go to "enhanced super duper fin"? 10ESDF?
  • Linustechtips12#6900xt - Wednesday, April 7, 2021 - link

    the marketing can be called ESD-F safe
  • trivik12 - Thursday, August 13, 2020 - link

    if a phone can have LPDDR5 why not a laptop. I am hoping to see premium laptops(XPS, Spectre, Thinkpad etc) to have an option of LPDDR5. Otherwise this sounds exciting. Even a 8 core 65w CPU for desktop should be interesting. I hope Intel does release that.
  • vFunct - Thursday, August 13, 2020 - link

    With 65W parts, does that mean we're going to see it in a 16" MacBook Pro?
  • AdditionalPylons - Friday, August 14, 2020 - link

    The 16" MacBook Pro uses 45 W chips (yes, even the high-end I9-9980HK is specified as 45W). I have the lower-end I7-9750H but still feel the cooling is inadequate, especially when using both CPU and GPU at the same time. Apple just wanted to make it as thin as possible, and didn't expect that Intel would fail so miserably at 10 nm. Now I'm not surprised at all that they are moving to in-house ARM CPUs.
    Personally I would have preferred AMD for x86 compatibility with my development applications at work, but I'll probably still consider an ARM Mac in a few years and in the worst case rely on ssh to workstations for development. HPCs for running anyway.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now