The Premise for Part II

At the end of the first Mac article, I came to the realization that what attracted me most to OS X was the way everything just worked the way that you'd expect it to. Prior to my OS X experiment, I had done things in reverse. I molded my usage patterns to the way Windows wanted them to work in order to get things done. What I realized with OS X was that not only did I find myself being more productive, but I noticed that one of the biggest strengths of the OS was in its window/task management. Regardless of how cluttered my screen was or how many applications I was running, I never felt bogged down. And where did I find myself bogged down more often than on my desktop? On my laptop, of course. The other big advantage (for Apple) in the laptop world is that laptop gaming is still something that's not too common. Other than using massive 17-pound desktop replacements as gaming machines, most people just don't use their laptops for gaming - which happens to be one of the biggest weaknesses of the Mac platform. So was it time to revisit the idea of using an Apple laptop?

When I originally went through the decision-making process of picking the platform on which to do the first Mac article, I arrived at the dual 2.0GHz Power Mac simply because it was the fastest thing available at the time. I had held Apple's PowerBook G4s before and I'd never been impressed with them simply because they weighed too much. I was used to thin and truly light notebooks. With the lightest PowerBook G4 weighing in at 4.6 lbs, I decided that Apple laptops were hardly my cup of tea.

The more I used the G5 desktop, the more I felt that I didn't need an Apple laptop as well - I was just fine switching between Windows and OS X as I moved between my desktop and my laptop. But then it came time to head to Taiwan for a week, a week where my only computer would be my extremely portable, ultra thin, ultra light 1.7lbs Sony X505/SP. That notebook defines portability. The motherboard in the X505/SP is about the size of a minidisc, and it weighs less than most paper notebooks, not to mention just about any laptop out there. Taking it on a plane isn't an issue - it has only a 2-hour battery life, but at 1.7lbs, you can't really complain. The only issue with the notebook is that it is a bit of a pain to type on the keyboard, and for a writer, that can be a problem.

So, I thought the trip to Taiwan late last year would be the perfect time to see how well one of Apple's PowerBook G4s would work out, from a PC user's perspective. But which one?

Apple makes five different PowerBook G4s: two 12" models, two 15" models and a 17" model. I figured my X505/SP already had the portability side of things down, so there was no point in going for a 12" system. The 17" was just obscenely big and I didn't need a desktop replacement, so I settled on a 15" model. The 1280 x 854 resolution was reasonable, but most importantly, I could get a 1.5GHz G4 instead of the 1.33GHz chip that was the highest offered in the 12" models. I was happy with the performance of the 2.0GHz G5, so I figured I needed the fastest possible G4 to prevent ruining the experience.

The system starts at $1999, but that's for the 1.33GHz G4 with only 256MB of memory. The 1.5GHz model also comes with 512MB of DDR333, a slightly larger 80GB drive and a fiber optic backlit keyboard - but it also bumps the price up to a hefty $2499. Laptops have been dropping in price. However, the more stylistic, feature-filled or thin and light solutions always carry a price premium, so it's not too difficult justifying the price of the PowerBook - assuming it does actually deliver. As always, student discounts do apply - knock about $200 off each notebook if you're a student or educator.

The full specs of the system are as follows:
  • PowerPC G4 1.5GHz
  • 512MB DDR333 SDRAM (2 x 256MB SO-DIMMs)
  • Toshiba 80GB MK8025GAS ATA HDD
  • Slot Loading 4x SuperDrive (CD-RW/DVD-R)
  • 15.2" Widescreen Display (1280 x 854 native resolution)
  • ATI Mobility Radeon 9700 (64MB)
  • PC Card/CardBus slot
  • Integrated AirPort Extreme Wireless (802.11g)
  • integrated 10/100/1000 Ethernet
  • Integrated Bluetooth
  • FireWire 400 Port
  • FireWire 800 Port
  • Two USB 2.0 Ports
  • Integrated DVI Output (with VGA dongle)
  • Integrated S-Video Output
  • 5.7 lbs - 13.7" x 9.5" x 1.1"
  • OS X Panther (10.3)
  • iLife
The specs are pretty competitive with most PC laptops, but the PowerBook that I chose is priced higher than most competitive PC laptops. Granted, you won't have every last feature on the PC solutions, but for the most part, the competing PC products are in the $1600 - $2000 range, while the 15" PowerBook G4 1.5 is priced at $2499 ($2299 with student discount). The 1.33GHz model is a bit more competitive at $1999, but it only comes with 256MB of memory, while almost all competing PC laptops in this price range come with 512MB. Granted, the PowerBook G4 is nearing the end of its product cycle and hasn't had its pricing adjusted in a little while.

One advantage that the PowerBook offers over competing PC notebooks is its size and weight. For example, Sony's K-series notebooks offer a similar 15.4" widescreen display, but weighs in at 8 lbs, which makes the 5.7 lbs of the 15" PowerBook seem like a feather. The same K-series notebooks are also considerably thicker, at 1.6 - 2.2" vs. 1.1" for the PowerBook. The K-series from Sony also carries a larger footprint, at 14.1" x 10.9".

Comparing the PowerBook to similar 15" widescreen Dell solutions reveals similar size and weight advantages. The Inspiron 8600 features a 15.4" widescreen display, yet has a starting weight of 6.9 lbs and is 1.52" thick. The 8600 is also larger at 14.22" x 10.79". The Inspiron 6000 is a bit lighter at 6.65 lbs and is also 1.52" thick. The Latitude D800 starts at 7 lbs and is 1.5" thick. Both the Inspiron 6000 and the Latitude D800 also feature footprints similar to the 8600.

So, although competing PC notebooks are cheaper, nothing with the same monitor size can actually offer lighter weight or smaller dimensions than the 15" PowerBook, which is definitely an advantage for Apple, and it's something that is much needed on the mobile side of things.

What's Changed Since Part I The PowerBook Arrives
Comments Locked

60 Comments

View All Comments

  • RMSistight - Monday, January 24, 2005 - link

    Hey Anand, make sure you check your video links. One of them doesn't work. Also, when are you going to release a full review of the Mac Mini? I'm dying to see it's performance and also what it looks like piece by piece under the hood.
  • billsuspect - Monday, January 24, 2005 - link

    When it comes time to review the mini, please please please keep focused on the fact that it's a Grandma Machine!
  • Entropyq3 - Monday, January 24, 2005 - link

    That iLife comment above - what I've found, silly as it may sound particularly from a middleaged man, is that Llife really encourages creativity in its users.
    Just about everyone I know that has gotten in touch with the programs have gotten more interested in some creative area - be it making tracks in GarageBand, using their digital camera much more since it's so easy to keep track of your pictures in iPhoto, getting back into music due to iTunes, or actually doing something with your videos in iMovie so that they can be shown to and actually enjoyed by other people.

    Just seeing them as lightweight "getting started" apps misses the effect of them being so damn accessible that even my elderly mother can use them. And she finds surfing the web difficult. If you have a latent interest or talent, the iLife suite will let you get your feet wet and try things out. And that's important.
  • Entropyq3 - Monday, January 24, 2005 - link

    Interesting to see your takes on the mac - as a long time user of many platforms I'm gratified to see a representative of the PC hardware reviewing community opening up to what other platforms can offer. Although it is a bit galling when a newbie on a platform you have used for a long time comes up with nifty features you weren't even aware was there. :)
    If you are going to review the Mac mini, then having a look at the iLife suite is nigh on unavoidable - it makes up such a large part of what the user experience of the Mac mini would be to many general users. But then, that would probably make the review take longer, and the suite is not at all specific to the mini.
  • goates - Monday, January 24, 2005 - link

    Great article.

    If only more PC users were this open minded about using other platforms.
  • Chuckles - Monday, January 24, 2005 - link

    #6: You can set the trackpad to click when tapped without Sidetrack.

    Anand: Nice article again.
  • habibbijan - Monday, January 24, 2005 - link

    If you want to try to avoid using the mouse as much as possible, you should take a look at Quicksilver.
    http://quicksilver.blacktree.com/

    This little freeware app allows you to launch any program or navigate your filesystem with just a few keystrokes.
  • Hikari - Monday, January 24, 2005 - link

    Good article!

    However, I sort of disagree on the screen. I think Macs have an even bigger need for higher resolutions. I hope the Powerbooks get 1400x1050 or some similar widescreen resolution soon, but that might not be until the next OS version which has resolution independence I think.

    I owned a Pbook 867. :D
  • hopejr - Monday, January 24, 2005 - link

    Great article! Learnt a few things in that I didn't know about before (e.g. the fn+delete thing - not having a proper delete key on my iBook G4 always irked me, but now I know I had one all along!, oh, and the drag folders into the save window thing - that's really nice).
    I think I'm going to be even more productive on my laptop than I already am! (I use it as my main system too :P)
  • vmajor - Monday, January 24, 2005 - link

    I just bought a an iMac for my elderly neighbout that has never used a computer before. There really wasn't any other choice. A PC just would not work as well - the viruses and trojans would have brought the system to its knees within a week.

    What surprised me was how much I liked the iMac! The machine is truly fantastic! I am a hardcore PC user - having built all my PCs over the past ten years or so. But I can really see myself owning a nice Mac with a huge wide screen (or two) sometime in the near future, and keep my XP Althlon 64 (FX) box for games.

    All of you really need to play with MacOS X and admire the achievement... simple and nice and it still has a fully functional UNIX shell...

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now