Google Announces Pixel 4a - A $349 Valueby Andrei Frumusanu on August 3, 2020 11:30 AM EST
- Posted in
- Pixel 4a
Today Google is announcing its 2020 successor to its budget/mid-range line of phones in the form of the new Pixel 4a. Awaited since several months now, but seemingly delayed into August, the new Pixel 4a brings to the table a few key upgrades whilst offering a Google software experience at a $349 price point.
Last year’s Pixel 3a and Pixel 3a XL were seemingly well received devices, with Google’s strategy being mostly focused on offering a “Google Experience” software stack that’s only found on Pixel devices. This year, Google is trying to continue this focus with the Pixel 4a, with the biggest obvious change being that we’re not seeing a 4a XL being released at this point in time.
|Google Pixel 4a|
2x Kryo 470 (CA76) @ 2.2GHz
6x Kryo 470 (CA55) @ 1.8GHz
2340 x 1080 (19.5:9)
|Main||12.2MP 1.4µm Dual Pixel PDAF
f/1.7 77° lens with OIS
|Front Camera||8MP 1.12µm
f/2.0 84° lens; fixed focus
|Storage||128GB UFS 2.1|
3.5mm headphone jack
|Wireless (local)||802.11ac Wave 2 Wi-Fi
Bluetooth 5.1 LE + NFC
|Cellular||Snapdragon X15 LTE
DL = 600Mbps
3x20MHz CA, 256-QAM
UL = 150Mbps
2x20MHz CA, 64-QAM
|Other Features||Dual Speakers, 18W Fast Charging|
|Dual-SIM||1x nanoSIM + eSIM|
|Launch Price||$349 / 349£ / 349€|
Hardware-wise, the Pixel 4a is being powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SoC, a chip platform that’s nearly 1.5 years old by now. The SoC features two Cortex-A76 cores at 2.2GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores at 1.8GHz, accompanied by an Adreno 618 GPU.
Whilst certainly not a bad SoC in itself and is well fitting for a device of this price range, the fact that Google had opted to release a 4G device at this point in time, and versus new the competition such as 399€ Snapdragon 765 phones like the OnePlus Nord puts the Pixel 4a at a rough spot in terms of long-term value proposition. We’re currently at an inflection point between standards in the smartphone industry, so it’s definitely something I would consider if you’re planning to keep a device for more than a year.
Memory wise, Google has configured the Pixel 4a competitively as it features 6GB of RAM and 128GB of storage.
One of the best aspects of the Pixel 3a phones were that they feature OLED displays, and the 4a continues the trend for the higher-quality display technology even though the phones are at the lower price range. The screen diagonal has risen to 5.81”, however that’s only because the aspect ratio has been increased to 19.5:9 thanks to the move to a full-screen display design.
The 2340 x 1080 resolution screen now features a hole-punch front-camera located in the left corner of the notification area, actually representing Google’s most modern design aesthetic to date in this regard.
The phone has a similar form-factor as the Pixel 3a, actually shrinking in length from 151.3 to 144mm. The width which most notably is the defining factor into one-hand usability of a phone has remained similar at 69.4mm – which is actually on the smaller size compared to most other devices on the market right now.
The small size does have one disadvantage, and that’s the battery size which falls in at 3140mAh which isn’t all that competitive in the current landscape. The only silver lining here is that the phone weighs in at only 143g which makes it very lightweight, a lot having to do with the plastic housing of the phone that is actually quite uncommon to find in a phone nowadays.
The phone features up to 18W PD charging capability, however wireless charging was one of the features on the chopping block in order to achieve the lower price-point.
In terms of camera experience, it’s pretty straightforward for the Pixel 4a: It houses the very same module that is found on the Pixel 4. This means it’s again the same 12.2MP sensor coupled with a f/1.7 optical system at a conventional viewing angle of 77° which corresponds to a 27mm equivalent focal length.
The good news for the Pixel 4a is that at this price range, the phone should have an easy time to compete with most other phones as the camera is still amongst the best performers on the market. Whilst the main module is seemingly going to offer a great experience and will certainly be able to compete and probably outperforms phones such as the iPhone SE, it’s still only a single camera module setup – which is going to be again quite weird given that most other vendors at least have two usable camera modules, most of them opting for an ultra-wide-angle.
The front-camera also sees the adoption of the very same 8MP f/2.0 module that is found on the Pixel 4.
In essence, the camera performance of the Pixel 4a should be in line with the Pixel 4, for which you can read our comprehensive comparison in context of all other flagship devices in 2020.
Other notable mentions of the Pixel 4a is the fact that it continues to use a rear capacitive fingerprint reader, and luckily still maintains a 3.5mm headphone jack that’s no longer present on the higher-end Pixel phones.
A Lower Price at $349
The Pixel 4a comes at $349 which is $50 less than the launch price of the Pixel 3a last year. What we’re getting this year are a more notably updated processor, more RAM, double the default storage which has been upgraded to UFS 2.1, and a new design including a new screen with longer aspect ratio. Whilst the camera department has seen the adoption of the new modules from the Pixel 4, these weren’t that big of a jump over the Pixel 3 and 3a – and Google still keeps things very simplistic with only a single rear camera.
Overall, it feels like it’s a solid package, at least it feels a quite better value proposition than what the Pixel 3a was last year. However, Google’s only real strength here is the camera processing; a $50 more expensive OnePlus Nord offers a faster SoC with future-proof 5G connectivity, a 90Hz screen, and throws in the extra ultra-wide-angle camera, even though it’s possibly not great in quality.
It should be noted that the Pixel 4a has a petite stature, and the lack of a Pixel 4a XL means that if you’re looking for a small phone, the 4a is amongst only a few other rare offerings on the market right now.
I see Google having a tough time against the mid-range competition in global markets, the fact that there’s almost no other comparable device offering in the US makes the Pixel 4a a seemingly no-brainer choice at this price segment, with the phone offering a magnitude better value than the flagship Pixel 4 line-up.
Availability for the Pixel 4a starts August 20th in the US, with later release dates in other markets such as October 1st for the UK, and late-to-mid September for other European markets.
Google also made a teaser mention that we’ll be seeing a 5G variant of the Pixel 4a later this year at a price point of $499, which if the only upgrades are a 5G compatible SoC, will be quite uncompetitive in pricing.
- Google Teases Pixel 4a (5G) and Pixel 5 Later This Year
- The Google Pixel 4 XL Review: Stuck In The Past In 2019
- The Google Pixel 3a XL Review: Does Mid-Range Make Sense?
- Mobile Flagship Phone Camera Overview 2020 H1: Still Picture Battle
- Google Announces Pixel 3a & Pixel 3a XL: Mid-Range Phones With Flagship Camera
- The Google Pixel 3 Review: The Ultimate Camera Test
- OnePlus Announces Nord - Snapdragon 765 at 399€
Post Your CommentPlease log in or sign up to comment.
View All Comments
CityBlue - Monday, August 3, 2020 - link"however wireless charging was one of the features on the chopping block in order to achieve the lower price-point."
Do you honestly believe that, or is that something you were told by Google?
Samsung wireless receiver coils could be purchased individually 5+ years ago for under $2 a piece - these days, receiver coil prices to an OEM would be pennies, $1 tops! The difference wireless charging support makes to the BOM is absolutely minimal - the only reason to cut this kind of feature is to avoid cannibalising the higher end sales.
nicolaim - Monday, August 3, 2020 - linkYup!
Peskarik - Tuesday, August 4, 2020 - linkand? I am sure you always say the hard truth in your life every time and everywhere, never a little white lie, ever, right?
Meteor2 - Tuesday, August 4, 2020 - linkA $1 part is quite expensive after you've sold 10m units...
CityBlue - Tuesday, August 4, 2020 - linkA device without wireless charging is a lost sale from me, and I'm also not going to pay hundreds of dollars more for an alternative high-end device that does have it, so my purchase instead goes to a different manufacturer that isn't looking to gouge me.
Hopefully Google will lose enough 4a sales to make a dent in the $10m due to the missing features costing pennies that are present as standard on other mid-range devices.
Once you've become used to the convenience of wireless charging it's such a backward step to use a charging cable again. If Google really needed to save a $1, they could even leave out the USB cable and 18w wall wart as you won't need them with wireless charging (and most buyers already have a drawer full of spares!)
Vinas - Monday, August 3, 2020 - linkAdd wireless charging and it's a smashing success. Without that simple feature this phone is quite dull. #alwayssettle
Peskarik - Tuesday, August 4, 2020 - linkwhat a dull comment
ads295 - Monday, August 3, 2020 - linkPersonally I'm loving the device and that they're offering UFS storage which was lacking in the Pixel 3A for $50 less.
I've always been on the lookout for a compact phone, this fits the bill perfectly as an lateral upgrade from my Galaxy S7, but man, that battery size is beginning to bother me now.
Peskarik - Tuesday, August 4, 2020 - linkagreed, the battery size is as usual at Google just on the limit. IT will last a day with light use, but that's it. I am not sure why Google insists on putting smallish batteries in, that is disappointing.
ads295 - Tuesday, August 4, 2020 - linkI was on the lookout specifically for compact phones. Samsung sells a Galaxy M01 for a third of this price with an LCD 5.81", 12nm CPU and basic camera... But it has a 4000mAh battery. Even smaller is the M01 Core for about 60% of that price but it has a 28nm CPU and 3000mAh battery coupled with a 5.4" display. Cute but a bad idea there.