Performance: x16 vs. x16/x2 vs. x8/x8 (SLI)

The best way to verify the success of the mod was to run benchmarks. We had already done extensive testing of SLI performance in Anand's NVIDIA's GeForce 6 SLI: Demolishing Performance Barriers. To get right to the point, we tested the Ultra modded to SLI with Half Life 2, Doom 3, and Far Cry at both 1280x1024 and 1600x1200. We also benchmarked at both settings with and without the eye candy - since Anti-Aliasing and Anisotropic Filtering can exact a large hit on a single GPU.

We were interested to see exactly what performance you could get with two video cards on the Ultra board before the mod to SLI, so we also ran benchmarks of the performance of x16/X2 Ultra dual-video card mode.

All tests were run on a DFI LANParty UT nF4 Ultra-D and a DFI LANParty nF4 SLI-DR. We first confirmed that test results were the same on the LANParty UT modified to SLI and the LANParty nF4 SLI, which is a native SLI chipset board. There was no difference in performance after the SLI modification to the Ultra chipset, so results are reported as SLI and relevant to either SLI or Ultra modified to SLI.

Video cards were a single MSI 6800 Ultra PCIe or a matched pair of MSI 6800 Ultra in SLI and x16/x2 modes. Memory in all benchmarks was OCZ 3200 Platinum Rev. 2 (Samsung TCCD) at 2-2-2-10 timings. The CPU was an Athlon 64 4000+, and the power supply was an OCZ PowerStream 600.

In the course of testing, we found that we could actually run the x16/x2 mode on either the SLI board or the Ultra board by leaving the jumpers in normal mode, using an SLI bridge across the two video cards, and enabling SLI in the nVidia driver. Results on the SLI board in x16/x2 mode were, as expected, the same on the nF4 Ultra board as shipped or the Ultra after SLI modification. The one huge advantage of the SLI-mod was that once we had SLI-modded the Ultra chip, we could run x16/x2 mode with any nVidia Forceware driver up to 70.xx. The 70.90 driver was the highest driver to support x16/x2 mode even with an SLI chip. x16/x2 would not run, however, with the most recent 71.xx drivers. 71.xx drivers report the board to be SLI-capable, but it does not recognize the second card as an appropriate card for SLI. Clearly, nVidia must have turned off x16/x2 support in the most recent driver as well, only allowing their specified x8/x8 mode to work. We suspect that enthusiasts will find a way to correct this very quickly.

UPDATE: The Gigabyte 3D1 is a single video card with two 6600GT GPUs. It will only work in x8/x8 (nVidia) SLI mode on a Gigabyte SLI board. However, we did find the 3D1 will operate in x16/x2 mode on both DFI boards with jumpers in "normal" position. We have added test results to our charts with both single 6600GT and x16/x2 dual video mode with the 3D1. The Gigabyte 3D1 provides the interesting possibility of a form of SLI performance on single x16-slot Ultra boards with the SLI mod.

Breaking the SLI "Code" Half Life 2: x16 vs. x16/x2 vs. x8/x8 (nVidia SLI)
Comments Locked

85 Comments

View All Comments

  • Wesley Fink - Tuesday, January 18, 2005 - link

    #40 and #44 -
    When the pads are closed on the nF4 Ultra chipset the chipset is then identified as SLI by the system and OS and performs the same as SLI. The x8/x8 is the nVidia defined SLI mode that works after the mod. The board can also - in addition - perform in x16/x2 mode.
  • icarus4586 - Tuesday, January 18, 2005 - link

    When the Ultra is modded to by closing the resistor pads, can it function in 8x/8x mode? At some points in this review I wasn't sure whether the modification allowed 8x/8x or just 16x/2x. Will 8x/8x work on a modified Ultra motherboard, as long as (like DFI's) it has 2 full length slots?
  • KristopherKubicki - Tuesday, January 18, 2005 - link

    Googer: Wesley is correct. The MSI "DBS" board had an open ended 4 lane slot with a full 16 lane slot. The DFI board runs on two 2 lane slots.

    Kristopher
  • archcommus87 - Tuesday, January 18, 2005 - link

    Does even a simple pencil mod like this void any warranty on any board?
  • Cygni - Tuesday, January 18, 2005 - link

    I honestly dont really see the point of the Ultra to SLI conversion. You are now paying an extra $400+ dollars for the second video card for 50% over the performance of one video card... it doesnt make sense. The 8x/8x SLI made the performance for the expendature much more attractive.

    The whole process of changing the Ultra to SLI is very cool, however, haha. Personally, I still see the extra $100 for a true SLI as worth it when you are already shelling out $800 for video cards (assuming 6800U's).
  • Zebo - Tuesday, January 18, 2005 - link

    I just don't see the attraction. It's slower obviously and anyone doing sli can afford a non-hacked solution like real live sli.

    Right now you can get SLI boards for $200. Thats insignifigant premium compared to two GT's @$500 a each. And especially after this flood of new boards price will come down on the real sli boards.

  • bob661 - Tuesday, January 18, 2005 - link

    #16
    I said "cheaper" not cheap. Maybe you need to bone up on your reading comprehension skills.
  • Crassus - Tuesday, January 18, 2005 - link

    Wesley, thank you for following up on my comment.
  • Googer - Tuesday, January 18, 2005 - link

    By the way SLI offers a poor price to performance ratio, IN some games the performance is 10-15% or less and in others there is none. A single 6800ultra
    can beat a 6600 sli setup in MOST games.
  • Googer - Tuesday, January 18, 2005 - link

    Wesley are you sure it was MSI that had the x4 slot and an sli mode for the nFORCE4 ultra, because that discriptrion sounds more like DFI than any MSI beta board that I have seen lately.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now