Ultra-Wide-Angles: Wide, or Macro?

Ultra-wide-angles have become extremely popular in recent years and are a must-have for any smartphone as it opens up new capturing experiences in scenarios that previously just weren’t possible. The key points here is the viewing angle that the camera module achieves as well as the resolution of the sensor. Processing is also very important of course and that’s probably where we’ll see most differences from the various vendors.

Also, maybe unbeknownst to many, ultra-wide-angle can also serve as excellent macro unit as long as the manufacturer actually employs an auto-focus mechanism on the optics of the module; unfortunately, a lot of ultra-wide-angles are fixed focus.

Click for full image
[ iPhone 11 Pro ] - [ iPhone SE ]
[ Galaxy S20U(S) ]
[ Galaxy S20+(E) ]
[ OnePlus 8 ] - [ OnePlus 8 Pro ]
[ V60 ] - [ Mi 10 Pro ]
[ P40 Pro ]
[ Reno3 Pro 5G ] - [ Reno3 Pro ]
[ X-T30 ]

The widest ultra-wides are employed by Apple and Samsung which both have around 120° field-of-view, corresponding to an about 13-14mm equivalent focal length, while the remaining phones range from 15-18mm.

A lot of the phones do adequate jobs in terms of exposure, but my two favourites are the S20+ and the OnePlus 8 Pro, both which achieve a better dynamic range and HDR handling of the shadows.

It’s weird to see the processing differences to the S20 Ultra here as it’s the same camera module but on a different chipset, the Exynos S20+ is better in the HDR.

In practice at the default resolutions the Mate 30 Pro and P40 Pro have the best sharpness but that’s just because it’s a bigger sensor that also has to cover a smaller 3:2 aspect ratio field of view. Huawei doesn’t make it easy to use the 40MP mode of these sensors so it’s a hassle to switch to them, it’s a practically unusable feature in every-day photography.

The OnePlus 8 Pro is the only other phone with a high resolution ultra-wide-angle. The 48MP picture certainly gives a lot more detail than the default 12MP, but it loses out a bit in dynamic range. The optics here really can’t keep up with the sensor as we see quite a lot of chromatic aberrations throughout the scene, but frankly that’s to be expected at this focal range and FoV.

Click for full image
[ iPhone 11 Pro ] - [ iPhone SE ] - [ Pixel 4 ]
[ Galaxy S20U(S) ] - [ Galaxy S20+(E) ]
[ OnePlus 8 ] - [ OnePlus 8 Pro ]
[ V60 ] - [ Mi 10 Pro ]
[ Mate 30 Pro ] - [ P40 Pro ]
[ Reno3 Pro 5G ] - [ Reno3 Pro ]
[ X-T30 ]

This next scene is a bit harder with dynamic range as we’re having bright sun-lit elements as well as dark elements in the shadows. It’s the OnePlus 8 Pro which provides the best exposure and natural look. In the 48MP mode I think the 8Pro actually does even bit better as it doesn’t flatten out the highlights as much on the building. The regular OP8 loses out in depth in the highlights and mid-tones and look flatter.

In this regard, the S20+ does better than the S20 Ultra and the iPhone 11 Pro as well, although the white building façade is blown out. The iPhone tries to compensate for this but ends up looking flat.

The V60 and Mi 10 Pro sensors here are also probably near their limits as they opted to blow out the white façade in order to keep more dynamic range in the rest of the image – a good choice as it’s still a good overall picture.

Huawei’s processing on the P40 Pro seem tamer than on the Mate 30 Pro so while it looks natural, it could have been a bit brighter in the exposure.

Just quickly switching over to the main high-resolution shots we again see the squiggles in the bridge barrier alongside rainbow Moiré in a lot of the phones. This time around it’s also slightly prevalent on the Mi 10 Pro and Reno3 Pro with Samsung sensors so it seems those sensors aren’t completely immune to it.

Click for full image
[ iPhone 11 Pro ] - [ iPhone SE ] - [ Pixel 4 ]
[ Galaxy S20U(S) ] - [ Galaxy S20+(E) ]
[ OnePlus 8 ] - [ OnePlus 8 Pro ]
[ V60 ] - [ Mi 10 Pro ]
[ Mate 30 Pro ] - [ P40 Pro ]
[ Reno3 Pro 5G ] - [ Reno3 Pro ] - [ X-T30 ]

Macro photography isn’t normally something we test out in our reviews but it’s something I just wanted to quickly go over in this piece. Macro means that you have a high reproduction factor of an object across the camera’s sensor; a real macro camera generally is considered that an object of a certain physical size actually covers the same size across the sensor. You can achieve this in two ways, you either have long focal range to zoom in onto the object, or you move the camera closer to the object in which case the focus mechanism needs to be able to actually focus that close.

Most smartphones today have either one or the other option with their cameras, usually with their telephoto module or the ultra-wide-angle. There are also some cheaper phones out there with dedicated macro module but generally they’re all useless in terms of quality.

These shots of these caterpillars aren’t really apples-to-apples comparisons but rather just a showcase of the best-effort in terms of getting as close as possible to the subjects.

The default shot here is actually from the Reno3 Pro. Both phones have auto-focus UWA modules so you’re really able to hold up the phone extremely close to the subject and still have it in focus. This gives a quite great result in terms of magnification.

A lot of the phones with 2x modules weren’t really able to focus as close so that’s why generally I skipped those pictures are they’re just not useable, and you’re better off trying to focus with the main module.

It’s the higher magnification telephoto modules which do the best and that includes the S20 Ultra, the P40 Pro and the Mi 10 Pro, although none of them are quite as sharp as the Reno3’s UWA at the focal plane.

Click for full image
[ iPhone 11 Pro ] - [ iPhone SE ] - [ Pixel 4 ]
[ Galaxy S20U(S) ] - [ Galaxy S20+(E) ]
[ OnePlus 8 ] - [ OnePlus 8 Pro ]
[ V60 ] - [ Mi 10 Pro ]
[ Mate 30 Pro ] - [ P40 Pro ]
[ Reno3 Pro 5G ] - [ Reno3 Pro ] - [ X-T30 ]

Sometimes you can’t actually get as close to the subject. Although the Reno3 phones have excellent macro shots of the centre of the flower I actually have to get as close to it that it bends one of the petals, which just doesn’t look as good for the shot.

The iPhone’s 2x telephoto actually does a real good job here in getting a good composition. The other phones have to sit back a bit further to focus properly. Oddly enough I got better shots with the regular OnePlus 8 rather than the 8 Pro here.

The S20 Ultra appears to get great magnification at the 4x zoom level but under closer inspection this is actually misleading as the phone actually took this with the main camera rather than the telephoto module, resulting in a blurry magnified shot.

The P40 Pro has the best real magnification amongst all the phones. I guess the narrow aperture of this module also helps it not have a quite as thin focal plane, I had to stop down to f/14 on the Fuji to get something that was similar.

Overall Ultra-Wide-Angle

In general, the first step to having a good ultra-wide-angle is actually having one, so the Pixel 4 eliminates itself from the competition here. The second step is considering the field of view of the UWA. Apple and Samsung have the widest views amongst all other vendors out there and this regard I do find them to be the most “fun” with their cameras.

Quality-wise, things vary quite a bit depending on what the processing ends up deciding to do. I found the S20 phones probably the most consistent on what they’re doing and they handle dynamic range the best in terms of the different scenarios whereas some of the other phones might end up producing flatter images, even when sometimes they aren’t quite as sharp. The OnePlus 8 Pro’s camera certainly is the sharpest amongst the UWA’s, and sometimes it even produces the best exposures, but it’s far less consistent.

LG, Xiaomi’s UWA’s are a bit hit and miss. They can be excellent, but sometimes the exposures and tones are more off than others.

Huawei’s modules are also technically great, but their reduced field-of-view take away a bit of the experience of an ultra-wide. In general, you can’t go too wrong with either Apple, Samsung or the OnePlus 8 Pro in terms of fun ultra-wide photography.

Zoom Modules: Who Sees Furthest? Low-Light: Where Software Beats Hardware
Comments Locked

130 Comments

View All Comments

  • StormyParis - Thursday, June 18, 2020 - link

    Thanks for a detailed balanced and interesting head-to-head.
    But, for me and the people around me, this increasingly misses the point: low- and mid-range phones have gotten so good that, off the top of my head, of the 20 people closer to me only 1 still buys flagships, and he's wavering. For the overwhelming majority of people, the issue with pictures is not the hardware, not the software, but the wetware. I had a guy pester me about the best cheap cameraphone... turns out he doesn't know what HDR and macro are.
    I'd be interested in a comparison across budget lines (something I'm regularly doing on GSMArena, but that's in-lab shots) and across years, to know *if* paying more is worth it, before I start agonizing about which expensive phone to get.
  • bernstein - Thursday, June 18, 2020 - link

    while true, i doubt this would be feasible. while there are just a few flagships there are a gazillion mid- & low-range phones.
    also, while cheaper sticker price wise, i doubt that they're that much cheaper overall. i tend to keep my iphone's 2-4 years at which point i sell them for around $250-500. that amounts to ~$15-20/month, which is about the same as my unlimited plan.
    sure you can buy a sub $500 phone and keep it 2-4 years too, but if you want it to be as secure as possible (get current os releases) you have to be VERY careful which one to buy... fairphone and the iphone se come to mind, but not much else.
  • StormyParis - Thursday, June 18, 2020 - link

    1- some low and mid-rangers sell a lot more than others. I'd think Redmi Note, Galaxy Axx, probably Oppo A9.
    2- It seems nowadays I'm keeping my $200 phones 3 years-ish too, so that works out to $6/mo. Are you counting AppleCare too ? I wouldn't leave a $1k phone uninsured, especially one with parts as expensive as Apple's (a XIaomi's battery and screen are $15each, and DIYable).
    3- VERY careful indeed. As in: not the same as Jeff "dick pics and biz secrets" Bezos (an iPhone), and not the one that fell to the biggest ever Mobile malware campaign (iPhones, xCodeGhost) or has the cheapest open-*market price for hacks (iPhone).
    My goal was not to launch the "is Apple worth the premium risk and constraints" debate, but I'm game anytime. I'm more interested in a both more general and more specific "are flagships worth it, picture-wise" article. Preferrably facts-based.
  • Speedfriend - Saturday, June 20, 2020 - link

    I don't know if it is the same in the US but in the UK iPhone trade in price have collapsed. A friend wanted to upgrade his year old XS Max 512 to get an 11 for the camera. He paid 1450 for the XS Max and the value now is 450, £1000 fall in 1 year.

    The release of the SE has collapsed the prices of older iPhone too
  • TheGodFatherOfAnons - Thursday, June 18, 2020 - link

    Pixel 3A, P30 Lite (GMS), P40 Lite (non GMS), Samsung A51, Xiaomis and Realmes without and with Arnova or BSG GCam are the kind of true midrange phones that could be chosen.

    The Huawei Lite versions of flagships are highly optimised, very akin to the Pixel 3A budget series for long now (people like their P10 Lite and P20 Lite too), which also have their revered Night Shot.

    I am able to do astrophotography with my P30 Lite, and I cannot think of a single phone under sub $300 that can do it this well, including Pixels. My custom one-click Snapseed filters make any pictures equivalent to and even untouchable for flagships in plenty cases.

    For an on-the-go shutterbug like me, Huawei's hardware and software do plenty justice in the camera department with Snapseed, since my DSLR is too inconvenient to carry and lacks software tricks for night.
  • iphonebestgamephone - Thursday, June 18, 2020 - link

    Those are some godly snapseed filters.
  • TheGodFatherOfAnons - Friday, June 19, 2020 - link

    I can share my algorithms with you, which are far better than HDR+ on Pixel or whatever fusion Apple made. I have filters like DayObjects, DayPeople, NightObjects, NightPeople, Contrasty, DarkPop, LightNightMode and ExtremeNightMode.

    Here, I am sharing my P30 Lite tuned Snapseed algorithms as imgur albums (even though it would be useless on less neutral image processing phones):

    DayObjects: https://imgur.com/a/3c0k6a0
    DayPeople: https://imgur.com/a/tl9V2eD
    NightObjects: https://imgur.com/a/fvwkOHr
    NightPeople: https://imgur.com/a/lyP4r1U
    Contrasty: https://imgur.com/a/coz3ECP
    LightNightMode: https://imgur.com/a/DyfA6k5
    ExtremeNightMode: https://imgur.com/a/5Un20xs

    However, it took me about 1000-1500 samples taken from my P30 Lite to tune it accordingly with Huawei's processing, so settings can differ for other phonemakers so it will be useless. I was able to do this with my DSLR photography experience and a good amount of experience with photo editing (and photography adequate eye vision for colours).
  • iphonebestgamephone - Friday, June 19, 2020 - link

    Ah the filters remind me of the various xmls for gcam. Denoise, detail, people, etc.
  • TheGodFatherOfAnons - Friday, June 19, 2020 - link

    I hope you can credibly call them "godly" now :P

    I suggest you try and implement them, if you like to give a true touchup to your photos, and tune it accordingly with whatever phonemaker algorithms you may have.
  • iphonebestgamephone - Friday, June 19, 2020 - link

    Yeah those pics do look good, though ill have to make my own filters for my op7p. I currently use gcam with like 10 or so xmls.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now