Intel doesn't benefit from high frequency RAM. Ryzen benefits from higher frequency RAM up to 3800. Ryzen will for sure support RAM speeds faster than 2400.
It's funny, because Ice Lake beat Zen+ APUs by 40% in single-core, 50% multi-core and 40% better power efficiency, and yet people called AMD's alternatives "competitive". There's clearly a different standard to what both parties are called.
Let's also not forget that we still know very little about upcoming Zen 2's efficiency. And also that Tiger Lake is coming this summer, which will for sure take back the single-core thrones and possibly also iGPU (Intel is promising 2x jump here from Ice Lake--Suny Cove).
We’ve updated our terms. By continuing to use the site and/or by logging into your account, you agree to the Site’s updated Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
406 Comments
View All Comments
Jugotta Bichokink - Tuesday, January 7, 2020 - link
DID YOU EVEN READ YOUR OWN COMPARISON GENIUS?AMD Ryzen 7 3780U
4C/8T, 2.3-4.0GHz, 15w Intel Core i7-1065G7
Memory 16 GB Dual-Channel DDR4-2400 16 GB Dual-Channel LPDDR4X-3733
Jugotta Bichokink - Tuesday, January 7, 2020 - link
Memory 16 GB Dual-Channel DDR4-2400 - AMD tested on 2400 Ram16 GB Dual-Channel LPDDR4X-3733 - Intel has 3733 in this comparison, derp!
Zizo007 - Thursday, January 9, 2020 - link
Intel doesn't benefit from high frequency RAM. Ryzen benefits from higher frequency RAM up to 3800. Ryzen will for sure support RAM speeds faster than 2400.Zizo007 - Thursday, January 9, 2020 - link
Ryzen 4000 mobile will for sure support higher RAM frequency than previous Gen.Sub31 - Friday, January 10, 2020 - link
In fact, Ryzen 4000 mobile supports LPDDR4-4266 (which has a half bus compared to DDR4)Xajel - Monday, January 6, 2020 - link
While I would love see this true, I also know that official statements are selective, picky & sometimes only gives you the bright side, eg.. tricky.So I would wait for the official release and independent reviews and benchmarks.
Although things seems pretty interesting and very good indeed.
bytebuster - Tuesday, January 7, 2020 - link
Just... calm down. Seriously.generalako - Tuesday, January 7, 2020 - link
It's funny, because Ice Lake beat Zen+ APUs by 40% in single-core, 50% multi-core and 40% better power efficiency, and yet people called AMD's alternatives "competitive". There's clearly a different standard to what both parties are called.Let's also not forget that we still know very little about upcoming Zen 2's efficiency. And also that Tiger Lake is coming this summer, which will for sure take back the single-core thrones and possibly also iGPU (Intel is promising 2x jump here from Ice Lake--Suny Cove).
Nicon0s - Tuesday, January 7, 2020 - link
40% single core advantage?LoL
More like 18% at best.
generalako - Wednesday, January 8, 2020 - link
Wrong Go check the Anandtech Ice Lake vs Picasso Surface Laptop 3 review. The single-core performance was 40% above it Zen+ APU.