As we move into 2020, there is a lot of talk about what Intel’s 2020 plans will be. Discussions about the expansion of Intel’s 10nm process node products, such as Ice Lake, beyond the mobile platform are often very heated, especially when we have limited information out of the company directly. For CES 2020, Intel has disclosed a couple of products for consumption: moving its 10th Gen mobile CPU line in to 45 W hardware, but we also had a couple of details about the post-Ice Lake hardware, called Tiger Lake.

With the 45 W mobile CPUs, it’s important to note that we are talking about Comet Lake here – Intel’s latest 14++ nm microarchitecture derived from the original Skylake but optimized from the latest Coffee Lake hardware. What this means for users is essentially a small improvement in frequency: Intel isn’t saying that much with what the new CPUs will bring at this point, but they are pointing out that they will be hitting 5.0 GHz with the new 45W Core i7 parts, and more than 5.0 GHz with the Core i9 hardware. I would assume this would mean that Intel is going to introduce both Turbo Boost Max 3.0 and its Velocity Boost technology to the mobile platform, which would target the best cores in the chip as well as use additional thermal headroom to get that extra frequency. Intel did not disclose if the turbo power increases with the new hardware.

We’ve seen a couple of designs already announce they will be using the 45W CPUs: Acer’s ConceptD Ezel and Ezel Pro laptops, along with Lenovo’s Y740S gaming laptop. Intel has stated that it expects its hardware to be in the market soon, with a full disclosure about the platform ‘very soon’, however it turns out that this won’t be in January. To be honest, if we’re so close to launching the product, I’m surprised as to why Intel isn’t disclosing.

The other part to Intel’s disclosure at CES is Tiger Lake. What is Tiger Lake, you may ask – it’s the next mobile platform beyond Ice Lake. Bearing in mind that Intel has been speaking about Ice Lake a while, and we now finally have top tier partners with 1065G7 designs, we’re still waiting for Intel’s mid-tier and lower-tier partners to come out with the platform. So we’re still a long way away from Tiger Lake, unless Intel wants to move beyond Ice Lake quickly.

However, regarding Tiger Lake specifically, Intel did confirm that it has Xe graphics. Whether this is related to the DG1 silicon that the company has spoken about recently isn’t clear, but Tiger Lake is monolithic and the Xe graphics inside will provide full INT8 support for AI workloads (which will be supported through Intel DL Boost). This would be built on the Xe-LP microarchitecture, which is targeting sub-25W power on the GPU. Tiger Lake also continues with AVX-512, but also upgrades the Gaussian Neural Accelerator for voice analysis to GNA 2.0. Intel will say more about Tiger Lake at its press event on Monday.

Intel also briefed us about its new Ghost Canyon NUC 9 kit, which uses Intel’s upgradeable element form factor as well as an 8-inch desktop GPU. The NUC is a full 5.0 liter size, which completely ignores the original NUC size that the platform was built on, however Intel is claiming 9th Gen 45W CPU support up to 5.0 GHz, with upgradeable units coming later. We have a separate article on this.

Carousel image is the Acer ConceptD 7 Ezel, one of the new laptop designs using the new 10th Gen Core H-Series CPUs.

POST A COMMENT

57 Comments

View All Comments

  • sarafino - Tuesday, January 7, 2020 - link

    Of course it did, it was a comparison between AMD's old Zen+ compared to Intel's high end Core i7-1065G7 Ice Lake cpu. Coffee Lake & Zen+ had comparable IPC, and both Ice Lake & Zen 2 both had similar IPC increases over their predecessors. If what AMD presented yesterday holds true, Ice Lake's glory will be short lived. Reply
  • prisonerX - Monday, January 6, 2020 - link

    It's 10th gen 14nm, aka 14++++++++++. Reply
  • MarcusMo - Monday, January 6, 2020 - link

    ”To be honest, if we’re so close to launching the product, I’m surprised as to why Intel isn’t disclosing.”

    Discrepancy between what they would like to announce for this generation to have any relevance, and what’s practical from a yield/volume perspective?

    You’ve got to hand it to Intel, they’ve done magic with what they’ve got, being stuck on 14nm for so long, but they really got to be at a point now where they’ve pretty much pulled all their tricks out of their sleeve. LPDDR4 support is probably the most exiting thing coming this gen, and that’s saying something.
    Reply
  • prisonerX - Monday, January 6, 2020 - link

    "Magic" as in marketing sleight of hand. Intel products are about 80% bullshit these days. Reply
  • ironargonaut - Monday, January 6, 2020 - link

    If Intel's are BS then what does that make AMD's that aren't even close?
    https://www.anandtech.com/show/15213/the-microsoft...
    "AMD’s Picasso platform, featuring its Zen+ cores and coupled with a Vega iGPU, has been a tremendous improvement for AMD. But Intel’s Ice Lake platform runs circles around it."
    Reply
  • sarafino - Tuesday, January 7, 2020 - link

    Do you just keep copy and pasting the same rant over and over? Reply
  • rahvin - Monday, January 6, 2020 - link

    Because they've been promising 10nm chips were going to ship soon since 2016! I'll believe it when I see it. Reply
  • sarafino - Tuesday, January 7, 2020 - link

    They have pushed 14nm much further than I would have expected. Quite refined. Reply
  • yankeeDDL - Monday, January 6, 2020 - link

    Intel's mobile offering, today, is noticeably superior to AMD's: just review the Surface 3 comparison. It's less than, say, 3 years ago, but still significant.
    The 4*** gen should fill the gap. I am hoping that it would bring a similar situation as on desktops (where AMD wins hands down today): should be good for consumers to have finally some competition on the laptops. I have some A10 laptops that I would like to replace: looking forward to the comparison.
    Reply
  • sarafino - Tuesday, January 7, 2020 - link

    Ice Lake's victory looks like it will be short lived if the 4000 series is as good as AMD claimed. I'm looking forward to seeing what kind of performance the 4800H is able to achieve in well-engineered laptop. Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now