Deep Impact

The ASUS ROG Crosshair VIII Impact costs $430. There's no getting away from it - this is by far the most expensive small form factor motherboard at present on the X570 chipset. There ASUS ROG Crosshair VIII Impact also throws up an interesting question for SFF systems, with its slightly larger mini-DTX form factor. The Impact is effectively in a class of its own at the price point and with the unique DTX form factor. That being said, while the primary target market of the Impact is enthusiasts looking to build a smaller form factor,  the truth is that the mini-DTX size does cancel out any mini-ITX chassis designs, causing the user to look at micro-ATX cases. 

Its core feature set comes also comes from its use of the SO-DIMM.2 slot which allows users to add two PCIe 4.0 x4 M.2 drives in with both NVMe and SATA support included. Outside of this is four SATA slots, with two straight-angled, and two right-angled ports with RAID 0, 1, and 10 support out of the box. The provided networking support of Intel's I211-AT Gigabit Ethernet controller raises questions as to why a model costing $430 is still reliant on a single gigabit Ethernet port, but the inclusion of an Intel AX200 Wi-Fi 6 wireless interface which adds BT 5.0 connectivity does offer some credence to the price tag. 

Another interesting feature is how the SupremeFX S1220 HD audio codec and assisting ESS ES9023P DAC has been implemented to save even more space on the ROG Crosshair VIII Impact; through an M.2 B-key slot located just below the full-length PCIe 4.0 x16 slot. The S1220 HD codec itself comes with EMI shielding and plenty of gold Japanese audio capacitors, and as from most onboard audio solutions, is well isolated from the rest of the board's componentry. This is covered by a ROG themed black metal fascia which fits in with the rest of the Impact's neutrally black color scheme.

The overall design of the ROG Crosshair VIII Impact is clean, concise and for what it has in integrated RGB along the right-hand side of the board, it looks good and not overpowering. Users can expand on this with two ARGB connectors, one on the PCB itself and one on the SO-DIMM.2 add-on card. The SO-DIMM.2 also adds two 4-pin fan headers in addition to the three 4-pin headers located on the board; one for a CPU fan, one for a water pump, and another designated as a chassis fan header. This further adds to the Impact as both a premium model and one that's suitable for water cooling.

Looking at connectivity, on the rear panel is plenty of USB support which consists of five USB 3.1 G2 Type-A, one USB 3.1 G2 Type-C, and two USB 3.1 G1 Type-A ports. Unlike most conventional models, ASUS includes its LED Debugger on the rear panel and for good measure, also include a reset switch, a clear CMOS button, and a USB BIOS Flashback button. There are just three 3.5 mm audio jacks on the rear panel so users looking to use surround sound or speaker setups with more than three outputs will need to use the front panel audio header also featured on the M.2 B-key audio card; there's also a single S/PDIF optical output. The ASUS ROG Crosshair VIII Impact doesn't feature any video outputs but for a model to this standard and caliber, it would be expected that users will use a discrete graphics card.


The ASP1405I 8-phase PWM controller on the ASUS ROG Crosshair VIII Impact

The ASUS ROG Crosshair VIII Impact also performs very competitively with other X570 models on testing, with fast non-UEFI POST times, consistent power consumption and good computational performance. Couple that in with the impressive power delivery thermal performance which is underpinned by the 30 mm cooling fan directly over the heatsink is something all premium models should consider implementing. ASUS takes this further with a backplate that has a heatpipe in which is useful as the 2-phase SoC section is mounted on the rear of the board. The 8-phase CPU power delivery is teamed and performs very well in our overclocking testing with good VDroop for better efficiency, and has plenty of support for overclockers looking to take Ryzen 3000 under more extreme cooling methods such as LN2 with its own LN2 mode. At default settings, ASUS is known for its solid out of the box optimizations, but for overclocking, the Impact is the Dirty Harry of the small form factor X570 offerings.

It's hard to compare a $430 model such as the ASUS ROG Crosshair VIII Impact to other models which it dwarves in price. The next best model in terms of size is the ASRock X570 Phantom Gaming-ITX/TB3 ($240) which is mini-ITX and has Thunderbolt 3 support. While the ASUS ROG Crosshair VIII Impact is a solid board and looks to provide a very rigid platform to build on, the price really does take it out of the market for all but the extreme systems.

Power Delivery Thermal Analysis
Comments Locked

59 Comments

View All Comments

  • Dug - Friday, October 25, 2019 - link

    I also don't get the non uefi post time. Does anyone use legacy when setting up a new system these days?
  • lipscomb88 - Thursday, October 31, 2019 - link

    For x570, only asrock has gotten their tb3 cert through at this time. So you can k ow for now that only asrock boards will have tb3 this Gen. But I agree this ibfonwoikd be nice for all boards reviews going forwards since it will be a possibility for all platforms.
  • hanselltc - Saturday, October 26, 2019 - link

    Kinda wanna see the Strix X570 I. It is apparently just a mini Impact in terms of VRM.
  • abufrejoval - Sunday, October 27, 2019 - link

    I am baffled by these prices. With Ryzen being a SoC the added value of the x570 is little more than a hybrid IF/PCIe/USB/SATA switch, perhaps a $40 value, especially given that it's twin is already included on the CPU die carrier.

    So where does the rest of the money go? Can't be the gold on the slot contacts, because $80 mainboards have those, too.

    In a day and age where you can get 6 4GHz cores at $200 and 32GB of RAM at $100, I completely fail to see why the mainboard should cost more than both.

    That is the price of a dual socket Xeon server mainboard like the Intel S2600CWTSR!

    Makes me afraid of where TR boards will launch... What good are cheap CPUs, SSDs and RAM when motherboard vendors get greedy?
  • just4U - Sunday, October 27, 2019 - link

    12+4 power phases are one reason, Most of the upper end X470s had that but not Bluetooth 5.0 Wi-fi 6.0 2.5GHZ Nic PCI 4.0 etc..
  • abufrejoval - Wednesday, October 30, 2019 - link

    Well the power distribution it must be, because WiFi 6 and BT 5 is a $12 upgrade as M.2 and I doubt the RealTek 2.5GBit chip is even that much for OEMs: It's very similar to the 1Gbit commodity cousin that everyone sells at practically zero extra cost and even as a USB3 or PCIe x1 variant is $40 in low-volume retail today.

    But even if you take your entry level x570 mainboard for $150 (ASRock X570 PHANTOM GAMING 4) and add the other to at retail, that leaves $230 for... power delivery?

    I guess I value energy efficiency over the ability to pump 200Watts into a CPU that can't convert that into compute. It's the reason I keep eying the Ryzens to replace Xeon E5.

    And I *would* pay extra to have two bifuricated PCIe 4 x8 lanes switched into four PCIe 3 x16 slots to gain some workstation type flexibility in a full ATX form factor, since I have plenty of PCIe v3 hardware, I want to keep using (e.g. RTX 2080ti) and nobody yet offering anything PCIe v4 that I find attractive.

    Even a classic 8+4+4(+4) lane setup would be ok, assuming that native PCIe v4 adapters will come for faster fabrics.

    AMD wants to sell TR in that space, but those will have Xeon E5 prices again.
  • Korguz - Sunday, October 27, 2019 - link

    abufrejoval, you seem to know so much about how much a motherboard should cost, how about you break down how much EACH and EVERY part on the board costs, as well as the PWB costs to make, right down to the design, and manufacture of the board itself ?? ryzen isnt really a SoC, those have A LOT more in them then just the cpu cores, memory controller, and some IO.
  • TheinsanegamerN - Sunday, October 27, 2019 - link

    Why dont you justify why these boards are so stupid expensive? The crosshair VIII costs $110 more then the VII did, and all it brings to the table is a single PCIe 4.0 slot and wifi 6. Wooo?
  • gamer1000k - Sunday, October 27, 2019 - link

    I'm kind of disappointed with all the motherboard manufacturers effectively ignoring micro-ATX. There's all kind of awesome features being shoved into mini-ITX and now DTX boards, but these boards are then limited to only 2 RAM slots and the need for riser cards to fit all the features.

    MicroATX isn't all that much bigger (especially compared to DTX) and a lot of mini-ITX cases are growing to micro-ATX proportions for improved cooling and ATX is overkill for most use cases now with the downfall of multi-GPU for gaming and 5.25" drives, so why are manufacturers avoiding this form factor?
  • NanakiEmi - Monday, October 28, 2019 - link

    Most Micro ATX boards are considerably wider compared to ITX and DTX. They are still a very different class.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now