Dell Latitude D600: Construction - Build, Appearance, Size

The Latitude D600 has been on the market for sometime now, though recently, it has undergone a slight refresh due to the Dothan introduction. Design-wise, it is basically the same D600 that we have known from the Banias platform.



Click to enlarge.


The D600 follows the scheme of other Dell notebooks with angled down speakers and a single securing clip in the center. The speaker quality is what we expect in a business notebook - pretty much average. We should note that this is not meant to function in a multimedia capacity.



Click to enlarge.


Left side (left to right):
  • PCMCIA slot
  • SmartCard slot
  • IR port
  • Microphone port
  • Headphone port
  • Kensington lock port


Click to enlarge.


Back side:
  • 2 USB 2.0 ports
  • S-video port
  • modem jack
  • Gigabit Ethernet port
  • Parallel port
  • VGA-out port
  • Serial port
  • Power port
  • Exhaust vent


Click to enlarge.


Right side:
  • Kensington lock port
  • Multibay


Click to enlarge.


The D600 measures in at 12.4" x 10.1" x 1.2" and weighs in at about 5.3 lbs (with optical drive and 6-cell battery). It has a nice hard casing that is fairly resistant to scratching; though, make no mistake, it isn't scratch-proof.


Click to enlarge.

Click to enlarge.

Index Dell Latitude D600: In the Field
Comments Locked

23 Comments

View All Comments

  • Monkeydonutstick - Thursday, September 30, 2004 - link

    You can't be serious about comparing a Powerbook G4 to any of these. Powerbooks were owned by P3’s for Christ sake.
  • plewis00 - Thursday, September 30, 2004 - link

    I just wanted to point out as an nc6000 user that you didn't mention it's speakers (which as any Compaq user will know) are some of the best on any laptop - very rich with reasonable bass and strong volume, it easily rivals small stereos.

    Secondly, I don't think it's quite clear how much tougher the HP is than the Dell. I had both and pressing slightly on the Dell logo on the D600 would flex it down by about 3-4mm with very little pressure; the HP is far more robust, so it's size isn't that much of an issue (but the Dell is a bit of a headturner, the HP definitely isn't).

    Also (only a small point) but given the Dell's and HP's graphics cards, a small 3D-based test (3DMark2001 SE?) wouldn't have gone amiss [that's the reason I had these machines for their size and graphics]. In seriousness, with that Gateway, what are you going to do with a 1.7Ghz Dothan CPU if not game sometimes, or that you couldn't do with a Pentium III-M 850Mhz?
  • manno - Thursday, September 30, 2004 - link

    ksherman- "wheres the Macs? As far as im concerned, the Powerbook owns all these in terms of performance, size, weight, looks, and battery life... Its apparently even in the same price range as these "mid-sized" laptops... Bring on the Mac articles AT!"

    I have no clue about the technical aspect of the powerbooks size, weight, and battery life. But I do know you couldn't be more right about the looks... PLUS there's a Quake I... and I think a Quake II software renderer for Macs also... nudge nudge wink wink.
  • manno - Thursday, September 30, 2004 - link

    SOFTWARE renderer origianl "Half-Life" or "Quake 2". Preferably Half-Life. Their software reneder is more taxing than Quake 2's. Old school, yes, but it's not biased tward desktop, or laptop video cards.

    peace on!... Crakers!
  • AndrewKu - Thursday, September 30, 2004 - link

    #4 - Hopefully, we will get to that real soon.
  • AndrewKu - Thursday, September 30, 2004 - link

    #6 - Well, I hope we didn't knock it too much in the overall sense. But we are talking about the business user market segment, and we were putting more emphasis on the display more so than the other nic nacs.
  • YaBaBom - Thursday, September 30, 2004 - link

    I'm not a Gateway fan, but I think it's kind of silly to knock the Gateway laptop in the ratings because it doesn't have gigabit ethernet. Gigabit ethernet is nothing but a sales pitch as far as laptops are concerned, since the hard drives just arent capable of supplying data at gigabit speeds. I can tell you from experience that a D600 with gigabit doesnt transfer any faster than a C640 with 10/100 ethernet.
  • brainwave64 - Thursday, September 30, 2004 - link

    Great review! Very informative. It's hard to find good reviews of laptops that take into account things other than performance - like ergonomics, LED locations, battery life, weight, size, etc.

    --paperboy164
  • ksherman - Thursday, September 30, 2004 - link

    wheres the Macs? As far as im concerned, the Powerbook owns all these in terms of performance, size, weight, looks, and battery life... Its apparently even in the same price range as these "mid-sized" laptops... Bring on the Mac articles AT!
  • AndrewKu - Thursday, September 30, 2004 - link

    #1 - A64 based laptops, at least so far, are those best reserved for the DTR market, and thus are focused on the performance aspect of the notebook market. If you want mobility, get a P-M based notebook.

    As for half-life or other gaming applications, one of these notebooks uses Intel's integrated graphic's system, so that wasn't something that was practical, and of the other two that use discrete GPUs, one uses a DX8 mobile graphics part.

    #2 - Well... As far as weight and the general specs go, I think the whole market is becoming more and more grey. We will be back with a thin and light side of the Dothan market.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now