Display Measurement

When it comes to displays, last year's iPhone XS didn’t showcase any major display changes compared to the original iPhone X, as the two phones seemingly shared the same display panel. In contrast to that situation, for the new iPhone 11 Pros, Apple is advertising using a newer generation panel which brings notable improvements with it.

In terms of dimensions or resolution, there’s no visible changes on the new panels, and you’d have to look under the hood to see what has actually changed. The most notable improvement this year is a switch in the OLED emitter material that’s been used by Samsung in producing the new screen. The new generation emitter was first introduced in the display panel of the Galaxy S10, and to my knowledge it has subsequently only been used in the Note10 series as well as the new OnePlus 7T (regular version only). The iPhone 11 Pro phones now join this limited group of devices, and the biggest improvements to the user experience will be higher maximum brightness levels as well as improved power efficiency.

The regular iPhone 11, on the other hand does not seem to have changed much from the iPhone XR. It remains a relatively lower resolution LCD screen, although its display characteristics remain excellent.

We move on to the display calibration and fundamental display measurements of the iPhone 11 screens. As always, we thank X-Rite and SpecraCal, as our measurements are performed with an X-Rite i1Pro 2 spectrophotometer, with the exception of black levels which are measured with an i1Display Pro colorimeter. Data is collected and examined using SpectraCal's CalMAN software.

Display Measurement - Maximum Brightness 

In terms of maximum brightness, Apple has advertised that the new iPhone 11 Pro’s can reach up to 800nits of brightness displaying regular content. We’re able to verify this, as our 11 Pro Max sample reached 807 nits while the 11 pro reached 790 nits. Consequently, it’s quite odd to see that the LCD-based iPhone 11 is now the lowest brightness device in the line-up. As always, Apple doesn’t make use of any brightness boost mechanism and thus allows its peak brightness to be achieved in any scenario.

Apple also advertises that the screen does go up to 1200 peak brightness in HDR content, however I haven’t been able to go ahead to verify this in our current test suite.

 
SpectraCal CalMAN
               iPhone 11: 
        iPhone 11 Pro: 
iPhone 11 Pro Max: 

In the greyscale tests, all the iPhones perform extremely well, as expected. The Pro models do showcase a tendency to have slightly too strong red levels, so their color temperature is ever so slightly too warm. This characteristic diminishes the higher in brightness we go on the Pro models. The iPhone 11 has a weakness in the greens, so its color temperature is a above the 6500K white point target.

Gamma levels are excellent and target levels of 2.2. The Pro models are veering off towards higher gamma at higher picture levels, something that isnt as prominently exhibited by the iPhone 11. I’m not sure if this is due to a non-linear APL compensation of the phone screen during our measurement patterns, or if there’s an actual issue of the calibration.


iPhone 11 / SpectraCal CalMAN
iPhone 11 Pro / SpectraCal CalMAN
iPhone 11 Pro Max / SpectraCal CalMAN

Display Measurement - Greyscale Accuracy

The dE2000 deviation scores for the Pro models this year are slightly worse than what we saw in last year’s XS devices, however it’s still firmly among the best in class devices out there in the market, and you’d be hard pressed to perceive the small deviations. The iPhone 11 oddly enough does fare a bit worse off than the iPhone XR due to the larger deviations in color balance.


iPhone 11 / SpectraCal CalMAN

In the sRGB color space (default device content), the iPhone 11 performs extremely well with only minor shifts in hue in the greens.


iPhone 11 Pro / SpectraCal CalMAN

iPhone 11 Pro Max / SpectraCal CalMAN

In the same test, both the Pro models are showcasing exemplary accuracy.

Display Measurement - Saturation Accuracy - sRGB dE2000

The Pro models are just a bit worse off than the XS models of last year, but again these are among the most accurate displays you’ll find out there – mobile devices or not. The iPhone 11 is still excellent, although showing a bit larger deviation compared to the XR.


iPhone 11 / SpectraCal CalMAN


iPhone 11 Pro / SpectraCal CalMAN


iPhone 11 Pro Max / SpectraCal CalMAN

Display Measurement - Saturation Accuracy - Display-P3

For Display P3 content, the iPhone 11 Pro models showcase the best saturation accuracies we’ve ever measured on any display. This time around, the iPhone 11 is in line with the XR.


iPhone 11 / SpectraCal CalMAN

In the Gretag-MacBeth test of common tones, the only real issue of the iPhone 11 is the whites which had showcased a weakness of greens. Notice how the luminosity of the tones are essentially absolutely perfect.


iPhone 11 Pro / SpectraCal CalMAN


iPhone 11 Max Pro / SpectraCal CalMAN

Display Measurement - Gretag–Macbeth Colour Accuracy

Overall in terms of the color calibration and screen quality, the iPhones are the very best in the industry. There’s really nothing I can say about them as they’re class-leading in every regard.

The iPhone 11’s LCD screen isn’t for my taste due to the lower resolution, which frankly does bother me, and it certainly doesn’t have the same contrast characteristics as the Pro models. So while colors are still extremely good, it remains a compromise in 2019 when essentially every manufacturer has moved on to adopt OLED screens.

Display Power Measurements - Generational Improvements

Naturally, we didn’t want to finish the display evaluation section without verifying Apple’s claims about the new improved power efficiency of the iPhone 11 Pro panels.

Comparing the three generations of identical format iPhones, we again see that the display power consumption between the original iPhone X and the XS didn’t differ much at all. Plotting the new iPhone 11 Pro in the chart however we immediately see the difference in the new generation.

At equal brightness levels, Apple has indeed been able to improve the power efficiency of the panel by 15% - just as Apple’s marketing described it. We also see how the new panel expands past the brightness limits of the X and XS, reaching 800nits. This does come at a cost however, as the improved power efficiency isn’t able to completely make up for the larger brightness increase, so the maximum power consumption of the screen displaying full white does rise from 2.6W to 3.1W.

GPU Performance & Power Battery Life - A Magnitude Shift
POST A COMMENT

242 Comments

View All Comments

  • The Garden Variety - Wednesday, October 23, 2019 - link

    Ever stop to think it's you who is the outsider, and the thinks you think are important, not literally everyone else? Does that ever stop to cross your mind as you vent your spleen in these disconnected, slipshot rants across a growing number of Anadtech articles? Does it ever feel like to you that technology is slipping away from you, and the things that you and an ever shrinking minority think are important?

    Yeah, I didn't think so.
    Reply
  • s.yu - Tuesday, October 22, 2019 - link

    Your ignorance and arrogance is hard to look at.
    I set animation speed in my 2 year old Android phone to 0.5 and most operations are now much faster.
    My 1st gen iPP is also much faster across the board with the upgrade to iPadOS, that obviously didn't upgrade the hardware.
    Reply
  • Andrei Frumusanu - Tuesday, October 29, 2019 - link

    The video transcode tests in your linked videos don't even use the CPU, it's merely a hardware decoder/encoder block thing. Reply
  • d8e8fca - Saturday, November 2, 2019 - link

    The difference in SPECfp2006 scores between the A13 and the 9900k is actually a lot closer since the former includes the subscore for the 447.dealII test and the latter does not. Removing the test from the A13's score yields a value of 70.28, which is 6.5% slower. Reply
  • SirKronan - Thursday, November 7, 2019 - link

    Why do we still not have the reviews on the Samsung Note 10/10+ phones? These iPhones are still fairly hot off the press and Anand already has their very thorough review complete. I always prefer Anand's reviews of top tier phones to most other sites. This is a major letdown (that seems to indicate possible Apple bias?) to top tier phone enthusiasts. The Note 10+ isn't even on the battery comparison graph, despite representing a major battery size upgrade to Samsung's lineup. Reply
  • Andrei Frumusanu - Tuesday, November 12, 2019 - link

    We do not have the Note10's to review ; Samsung doesn't sample us.

    Given that the phones just aren't that much different to the S10's, we're unlikely to spend several thousand on purchasing the units for a review that won't have all that much new interesting information on the devices. As a note, we had to buy the S10s for that review earlier in the year.
    Reply
  • willis936 - Friday, November 8, 2019 - link

    Why is there not a single word on the storage subsystem? Reply
  • Lestat1886 - Friday, December 27, 2019 - link

    « the competition in 2019 was able to push out a ton of different designs that certainly look a lot more modern than the iPhone 11 family »

    I don’t really agree, unless a pop up camera is a counted as good design innovation... and those phones don’t have any face recognition sensors... i still find the iPhone design to be among the best out there and more than competitive
    Reply
  • LaDiva - Friday, January 24, 2020 - link

    Can anyone give me some feedback about the sound recording quality for iPhone11? I'm looking for something to do audition video recordings of classical singers - so acoustic quality is vitally important. I'd be very grateful for any suggestions/feedback.
    Reply
  • Lucas2999 - Wednesday, February 19, 2020 - link

    I want to know how to get the MLP data of A13/A12 and other Android Platform? Simple test code writen by yourself or standard benchmark test? Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now