Camera - Daylight Evaluation

We’ve had the Reno 10x in past camera hands-on and other device reviews, but since then the phone has had numerous software updates which may have altered the results. Of course, key aspects of the phone are its triple-camera setup with a wide, ultra-wide and the unusual periscope telephoto module. The “periscope” name refers to the fact that the sensor lies at a 90° angle to the body of the phone with its lenses, and “looks out” the phone via mirror/prism.

Click for full image
[ Reno 10x ] - [ S10+ (E) ] - [ S10+ (S) ]
[ Xperia 1 ] - [ P30 Pro ] - [ Mi9 ] - [ G8 ]
[ BlackShark 2 ] - [ RedMagic 3 ] - [ Pixel 3 ] - [ iPhone XS ]

In the first shot here in the forest, I noticed that a lot of phones have issues with colour temperatures, and the Reno 10x is amongst those devices. The main problem here is that it’s veering off to a too blue colour temperature, resulting in quite a lot of greyness of the picture. Phones such as the Mi9 with the same sensor or Samsung’s S10’s have a more accurate representation of the colours relative to the actual scene.

In terms of exposure and HDR, the Reno 10x does well. It still maintains highlights such as seen in the sky – which in this scenario is the correct processing choice. Dynamic range towards the shadows lacks a bit and that’s something typical of the IMX586 that we’ve encountered on almost every phone that employs the sensor.

The ultra-wide angle does slightly better on the colour temperature. Exposure and HDR are quite good in my view. Detail is also adequate, although not quite the best in class.

The phone doesn’t have a dedicated 2x zoom camera, however the phone still offers this discrete magnification step. The camera here uses the main camera sensor, however it’s not a crop of the 12MP shot but rather a crop of the 48MP native resolution of the sensor. I actually like that Oppo chose to expose this mode as a dedicated zoom button, and it does close the gap towards its 5x optical zoom module.

Click for full image
[ Reno 10x ] [ S10+ (E) ] - [ S10+ (S) ]
[ Xperia 1 ] - [ P30 Pro ] - [ Mi9 ] - [ G8 ]
[ BlackShark 2 ] - [ RedMagic 3 ] - [ Pixel 3 ] - [ iPhone XS ]

In the next scene, the Reno 10x does well on its main camera and wide angle.

It’s in zoom scenarios like this one where the 5x optics of the Reno 10x make sense. The problem however is that when comparing the shot to Huawei’s P30 Pro 5x zoom module, the Reno just looks blurry. Rather than the optics being out of focus, to me it looks like the camera is employing excessive noise reduction – either that or the OIS isn’t nearly as performant as what we see on the P30 Pro.

Click for full image
[ Reno 10x ] - [ S10+ (E) ] - [ S10+ (S) ]
[ Xperia 1 ] - [ P30 Pro ] - [ Mi9 ] - [G8 ]
[ BlackShark 2 ] - [ RedMagic 3 ] - [ Pixel 3 ]

On the main and wide sensors, the Oppo are a bit lacking in colour. The sensors also don’t have sufficient dynamic range and DTI to properly capture the petal detail of the flowers. On the zoom lens, although differentiating itself to other phones, it largely lags behind the P30 Pro when it comes to exposure, colour as well as detail.

Click for full image
[ Reno 10x ] - [ S10+ (E) ] - [ S10+ (S) ]
[ Xperia 1 ] - [ P30 Pro ] - [ Mi9 ] - [G8 ]
[ BlackShark 2 ] - [ RedMagic 3 ] - [ Pixel 3 ] [ iPhone XS ]

Even in more friendly scenarios such as this one, the telephoto lens of the Reno doesn’t match up to Huawei’s implementation. The result is just blurry and lacks sharpness.

Click for full image
[ Reno 10x ] - [ S10+ (E) ] - [ S10+ (S) ] - [ Xperia 1 ] - [ P30 Pro ]
[ Mi9 ] - [ G8 ] - [ BlackShark 2 ] - [ RedMagic 3 ] - [ Pixel 3 ] - [ iPhone XS ]

In indoor shots, the Reno 10x does ok, although we’re again seeing some dynamic range limitation of the IMX586 such as clipped blacks.

Daylight Camera Conclusion

The OPPO Reno 10x daylight camera performance doesn’t particularly stand out much compared to the competition. It’s got the same IMX586 camera sensor as many other phones we’ve tested in the past, however I feel that Oppo’s post-processing calibration isn’t quite the best out there. I vastly prefer Xiaomi’s Mi9 results in terms of colours and HDR, albeit Oppo has the hardware advantage of having OIS on the main sensor. The processing differences also translate to the wide-angle lens, it’s a good unit and behaves relatively well, it’s quite good but also doesn’t particularly stand out too much.

The periscope telephoto lens of the phone has disadvantages. The first aspect is the same I’ve encountered on the P30 Pro a few months ago – and that’s the question of exactly how useful 5x optical magnification is. The problem isn’t the magnification itself but rather levels before it, there’s a notable quality gap between 3x and 5x that isn’t covered well by the hardware. The other disadvantage is that this is meant to be a selling point of the phone and is the very namesake of the device, yet Oppo very much lags behind Huawei and the P30 Pro in the quality of the shots that the module is able to product. The P30 Pro just has significantly better results in terms of sharpness, colour and exposure.

Overall, the Reno 10x is a relatively non-eventful camera experience in daylight. It’s not bad, but it’s also not great. For a camera focused phone I had expected a bit more out of the unit.

Battery Life Camera - Low Light Evaluation
Comments Locked

40 Comments

View All Comments

  • dullard - Wednesday, September 18, 2019 - link

    I don't think I've ever thought about or ever noticed phone weights. Size and bulk? Yes. Weight? Never.
  • MarcusMo - Wednesday, September 18, 2019 - link

    It’s one of these things that you don’t notice until you pick up a phone that passes the point of being too heavy.
    I agree with the op, I hate the feeling of having a brick in my jacket pocket.
  • wr3zzz - Wednesday, September 18, 2019 - link

    That's a good point. If I still had to wear a suit everyday then the weight would be problematic.

    For those that don't have to wear suits, I actually like the slightly heavier phones, though anything more than 200g is still too much even for jean pockets.
  • Calista - Wednesday, September 18, 2019 - link

    Fuly agree, I find my Note 8 at 195 gram too heavy. I never felt the same in regard to my S7 Edge at 157 gram. And I find the Nokia 3310 at 85 gram a bit too flimsy instead. Depending on the individual of course, but to me a weight of 120-140 seem perfect. The S4 for example is 130 gram. Not feeling flimsy, still very thin and light.
  • eek2121 - Wednesday, September 18, 2019 - link

    The entire design trend of phones needs a rethink. At least one major OEM should put things in reverse and do things like a *plastic* or *metal* back, bezels on the top and bottom (with stereo speakers for the occasional time when you have to use your phones sound), and a SLIGHTLY smaller screen. As far as a headphone jack, I'd rather just see a dongle in the box TBH. The whole headphone jack thing is overblown. Pumping audio through the USB-Type C port means you get a clean digital signal, making it possible to do things like optical out, etc. Combine that with a built in amp on the phone (along with the 'quad DAC' that some LG phones have) and you get a nice clean signal that can either be converted to a headphone jack or hooked up to a soundbar or surround sound system.

    I'd also like to see micro SD cards return and have a storage manager built into the system that combines internal and external storage. Encrypt it if you want, but as quickly as prices have fallen (I just bought 4 128 GB microSD cards for $15...and they are REAL. Ran a tester on them.), External storage will be the way to go when you run out of space. I'd also like to see an AOSP style release without vendor junkware.

    The problem is I wouldn't pay a premium for those features. Such a phone would be worth about $499 if it had 4 GB of RAM and a Snapdragon 855 combined with a 2560x1440 AMOLED screen.
  • Tams80 - Wednesday, September 18, 2019 - link

    I agree with a lot of that, but definitely not the headphone jack port. It should stay, as as a connector it is more durable when in use because it can rotate. We're finding out that many USB C ports are not that much better than microUSB ports in terms of durability.
    Besides, all headphones end up analogue.

    It's not like the USB C port would suddenly lose audio transmission capability.
  • danielfranklin - Wednesday, September 18, 2019 - link

    " I want all my groceries on one bag, but i dont want that bag to be heavy! "
  • Tams80 - Wednesday, September 18, 2019 - link

    They could easily dispense of some weight by using plastic.
  • drexnx - Wednesday, September 18, 2019 - link

    all that heftiness and chunk and they still couldn't find room for a 3.5mm jack?
  • ToTTenTranz - Wednesday, September 18, 2019 - link

    "Low-light Conclusion - Terrible

    (...)

    Overall, the Reno 10x does adequately in low-light, which is something great to see as it means that future devices from the vendor will only continue to iterate and improve upon the current results."

    So.. um.. which is it?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now