Battery Life

The OnePlus 7 Pro comes with a 4000mAh battery with a standard nominal chemistry voltage of 3.85V which results in a capacity of 15.4Wh. It’s to be noted that this is the typical capacity of the battery while the rated capacity is 3880mAh / 14.93Wh.

We’ve seen from competing smartphones that what’s almost always more important than the actual battery capacity is the power efficiency of the components. We do expect the OP7Pro to have a higher power drain than competing smartphones due to the 90Hz screen, but the question is as to exactly how much more drain we’ll be seeing.

The battery testing results were done in the native 1440p resolution of the screen.

Web Browsing Battery Life 2016 (WiFi)

As mentioned before on the Display page, I had measured the device’s base power consumption with some conflicting numbers depending on methodology. One set pointed out the OP7Pro had quite large power drain, while the other set pointed out it’s almost as good as the Galaxy S10’s. The actual battery longevity results should shed more light onto this:

As I had anticipated, the OnePlus 7 Pro’s battery results veer more towards the higher power drain figures. In our web browsing test the OnePlus 7 Pro achieves good results, although it’s not able to keep up with the competition this year nor with the OnePlus 6T from last year.

Here it seems the phone does indeed have quite high base power consumption figures around the 550mW mark and the 100mW difference between 60Hz and 90Hz modes seems to be correct.

PCMark Work 2.0 - Battery Life

In PCMark, the 7Pro comes with good to great results depending on whether we’re using the 60 or 90Hz modes. I only had limited time with the device so I couldn’t also do the 1080p resolution battery life tests, and frankly I believe they’re not very relevant to the majority of users as there’s not much reason to use that mode.

In PCMark the 60Hz to 90Hz battery delta is slightly more pronounced than what we saw in the web browsing test, and this might be simply because the device is doing more computational work.

Overall, the OnePlus 7 Pro’s battery life is good, although it’s clearly not the best out there.

For me personally I use my phones a lot more in the evening and tend to use dark mode in the OS and apps. Under such scenarios the effect of a phone’s base power consumption will be more amplified as it represents a larger % share of the total consumed energy – and in this case the OP7Pro will give a noticeably worse result than say Samsung’s current generation.

Still, this is seemingly the first high-refresh-rate phone on the market that has completely useable battery life without any major handicap, all thanks to OnePlus’s optimal hardware implementation of the 90Hz refresh rate. In general if you’re buying the phone, you’re buying it for the 90Hz mode, and it makes very little sense to pay attention to either the 1080p or even 60Hz modes that the phone gives you.

A Word About 30W Charging

The OnePlus 7 Pro comes with a 30W charger. Here OnePlus is opting for a high current charging standard that goes up to 6A at 5V. The benefit of using a lower voltage and high current standard is that the phone’s PMIC will have a higher conversion efficiency when transforming the voltage down to the 4.4-4.5V cell battery charging voltage, reducing phone heating.

I am still extremely sceptical about these high power charging standards as they will more quickly degrade your battery capacity over time. At 30W / 5A for a 4000mAh battery, this means a peak charging rate of 1.25C which is well above the commonly agreed peak rated limit of 1C. Personally I would not trust to use such a charger in other than urgent circumstances, and generally I’m a bit worried at the battery longevity aspect of things with the current industry’s trend of racing to ever higher charging rates as a means of product differentiation.

Besides that, it’s also relatively disappointing that the OP7Pro doesn’t support wireless charging, even though the phone is relatively thick and does have a glass back. OnePlus said that this is something they’ll be looking into for future products.

Display Measurement - A Great Screen Camera - Daylight Evaluation
Comments Locked

91 Comments

View All Comments

  • Teckk - Wednesday, June 19, 2019 - link

    * 8/256 not 128
  • tdrsy - Wednesday, June 19, 2019 - link

    Looks like Oneplus camera went for Pixel like processing and darker pictures. Most of the pictures were closest to Pixel compared to others.
  • Andrei Frumusanu - Wednesday, June 19, 2019 - link

    Correct.

    Now I know people say that the Pixel's processing is the best in the world but I find it terrible in this regard.
  • zodiacfml - Thursday, June 20, 2019 - link

    because that is what you call avoiding clipping the highlights. I prefer this style or processing as a blown out highlight is dead giveaway that a camera is digital or cheap digital, clipping to white.
    in conventional cameras, there is an auto exposure setting called highlight priority with a similar affect, only drastically darker images than HDR in phones.
    this is the priority but they can't simply lift the shadows/dark regions for a brighter image as it will affect the contrast, making a flat image.
  • Andrei Frumusanu - Thursday, June 20, 2019 - link

    I don't know about you, but usually when I go out in the real world, I get blinded by the sun rather than having issues to see anything because it's too dark in broad daylight.

    Consequently, cameras should actually capture the real world rather than something akin to a dark sunglasses filter.
  • s.yu - Thursday, June 20, 2019 - link

    Really? I see that as a limitation of the eye's exposure compensation(similarly a camera could capture more in darkness than the human eye through extending exposures), while a camera should always aim for a set exposure value for a given metering method, but maybe that type of thinking is too old-school.
  • s.yu - Thursday, June 20, 2019 - link

    Ever since I started shooting DNG on Gcam my only complaint about the algorithm left is the presence of concentric ring shaped artifacts in difficult light, sometimes.
  • s.yu - Thursday, June 20, 2019 - link

    I should add that even if exposure's off by two stops everything could be losslessly recovered, mid-low ISO DNG from Gcam have at least that much latitude. Also dehazing (crucial to my phone camera whose cover glass now often retains grease) and sharpening can be applied with much leisure yielding minimal artifacts, I now usually start with 20 dehaze and 70 sharpening(LR default is 40) actually, as long as it's for phone screen viewing.
  • serpretetsky - Wednesday, June 19, 2019 - link

    Nitpick. "At 30W / 5A for a 4000mAh battery, this means a peak charging rate of 1.25 Coulomb which is well above the commonly agreed peak rated limit of 1C." C-rate for battery charging/discharging does not stand for Coulomb. Coulomb is a measure of charge. a 4000mAh battery is able to move 4amps(60)(60) Coulombs. amps=coulombs/second
  • Andrei Frumusanu - Wednesday, June 19, 2019 - link

    Thanks, brain-fart on my side.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now