GPU Performance

This generation GPU performance uplifts of the new Snapdragon 855 were relatively muted in devices that we’ve tested until now; Qualcomm had only promised and managed an average improvement of 20% over last year’s Snapdragon 845, even though the chip came on a new process node that should have enabled it for larger power and performance improvements.

The OnePlus 7 Pro thus seemingly shouldn’t be any different than the S10, G8 or other S855 phones in terms of the peak performance of the phone. Where OnePlus however can differentiate itself is the sustained performance of workloads. The company had made an emphasis on its “10-layer cooling system” which in layman terms consists of a heatpipe system with some new carbon dissipation tape in the internal design of the phone and its motherboard. In particular OnePlus claims no slow-downs in games, while it’s not the first company to promise this, let’s see if this time around the phone is able to achieve this.

3DMark Sling Shot 3.1 Extreme Unlimited - Physics

Starting off with the 3DMark Physics test which is mostly a CPU performance workload within a GPU power constrained scenario, we see that the peak performance of the phone is in line with other SoCs of this generation. What does stand out however is that the sustained performance, even though not as good as what we see on Kirin 980 devices, is indeed better than the Galaxy S10+ and the G8.

3DMark Sling Shot 3.1 Extreme Unlimited - Graphics

Moving onto actual GPU-constrained scenarios, we’re now starting to see what OnePlus was talking about: The OnePlus 7 Pro doesn’t seem to throttle much at all even after long prolonged periods of load. In 3DMark the device takes the very top spot in terms of performance. Until now last year’s Note9 was still the leader in this regard precisely because it was throttling less than newer Snapdragon 855 phones this year, but now with the OP7Pro also not throttling, it’s actually able to consistently showcase the SoC’s actual performance improvement.

GFXBench Aztec Ruins - High - Vulkan/Metal - Off-screen GFXBench Aztec Ruins - Normal - Vulkan/Metal - Off-screen

In the GFXBench Aztec benchmarks we see a similar story: There’s almost no throttling at all happening, and the device is able to maintain near peak performance seemingly endlessly.

GFXBench Manhattan 3.1 Off-screen GFXBench T-Rex 2.7 Off-screen

In Manhattan 3.1 and T-Rex we again see excellent sustained performance. It was a bit odd to see that the OP7Pro’s peak performance was slightly less than the S10+ and G8’s, it’s possible OnePlus is running the GPU at a slightly lower clock or has the DRAM running at more lax timings. However this doesn’t matter as it takes the performance lead after a short period of gaming.

Outstanding Sustained Performance – At A Cost

Overall, the OnePlus 7 Pro is currently the best performing Android device out there for gaming. OnePlus indeed was able to achieve an excellent thermal dissipation system, and the phone is able to disperse the heat across its chassis in a much more even manner than any other phone.

It’s to be noted that this still isn’t enough to catch up to Apple’s latest iPhone – here we’re just hitting fundamental limits of the Snapdragon 855 chipset which isn’t able to compete in performance and efficiency to the latest A12 chipset.

Although the thermal dissipation system of the OnePlus 7 Pro is excellent and better than a lot of other devices in the market right now, it does come at a cost. The company is still extremely lax in terms of maximum device temperatures under load. I was able to measure a peak of 51°C in terms of screen skin temperature, whereas devices such as the S10 will not allow for more than 42-43°C in the same scenario. So while the phone is extremely performant, it’s also extremely hot and the battery drain at these performance levels is also quite extreme and will go from 100% to 0% in less than 3 hours.

In the end, such load scenarios won’t be encountered by most users in every-day games, although if the game has an unlocked framerate, it will mean a lot more load than other 60Hz devices.

System Performance Display Measurement - A Great Screen
Comments Locked

91 Comments

View All Comments

  • Kishoreshack - Wednesday, June 19, 2019 - link

    One plus is a Solid Phone
    but
    Do you think the Premium Price tag just for the display is justified?
  • Andrei Frumusanu - Wednesday, June 19, 2019 - link

    Compared to the regular OnePlus 7, yes it's justified, at least for me.
  • warreo - Wednesday, June 19, 2019 - link

    I think it's unfair to call the OP7P pricing "premium". It's no longer "cheap", for sure, but to get similar specs Samsung or Pixel will run you $1000, $300 more than the OP7P.
  • 1_rick - Wednesday, June 19, 2019 - link

    $700 is absolutely a premium price, when mid-tier phones cost half as much
  • jordanclock - Wednesday, June 19, 2019 - link

    Just because the price ceiling has been rising doesn't mean the minimum to call a phone premium has followed suit.
  • cha0z_ - Monday, July 1, 2019 - link

    This is absolutely not true, galaxy s10/s10+ can be found a lot cheaper now and I am not even talking about contracts with mobile operators that will reduce the price even further going below opo 7 pro (and is not an option for opo 7 pro).
  • Kishoreshack - Wednesday, June 19, 2019 - link

    The phone tries to achieve smoothness of IOS but loses on polishing on the UI
    There are some bugs which can be addressed
    but I'm not sure whether they will address
    battery
    &
    camera issues
  • Kishoreshack - Wednesday, June 19, 2019 - link

    UFS 3.0 ZERO IS JUST A GIMMICK
    AS it faulters in Random I/O
    S10+ plus performs better than it
    One Plus is slowly becoming a Marketing Gimmick Phone
  • RSAUser - Wednesday, June 19, 2019 - link

    Definitely not, UFS 3.0 is about 50% faster in random IO. The S10+ in the benchmark can be a fluke, especially if they were testing the 1TB model as there would be a lot less fragmentation (plus more RAM).

    Then price difference. Next Samsung Note 10 will use UFS 3.0, will be interesting what happens there.

    And remember it's a standard, not an exact definition, OnePlus just needs to reach UFS 3.0 standard minimums for the connector/type, doesn't mean they have to implement the max capable. Same as SATA 3 random random IO still isn't maxed, since the drives themselves can't max the link, that's the wrong bottleneck.
  • Teckk - Wednesday, June 19, 2019 - link

    So the jump from 6/128 GB to 8 GB/128 is only 30$? But an additional 4 GB RAM is 100$ more?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now