Along today’s announcement of the new Cortex-A77 CPU microarchitecture, the arguably bigger announcement is Arm’s unveiling of the new Valhall GPU architecture and the new Mali-G77 GPU. It’s been three years since the unveiling of the Bifrost architecture, and as the industry and workloads continue to evolve, so must the company’s GPUs.

Valhall and the new Mali-G77 follow up on the last three generations of Mali GPUs with some significant improvements in performance, density and efficiency. While last year’s G76 introduced some large changes to the compute architecture of the execution engines, the G77 goes a lot further and departs from Arm’s relatively unusual compute core design.

A look back at Bifrost – third time’s the charm

It’s not too big of a secret that the last few years haven’t been very kind to Arm’s GPU IP offerings. When the first Bifrost GPU - the Mali-G71 was announced back in 2016 and productised later that year in the Kirin 960 and Exynos 8895, we had expected good performance and efficiency gains.

Bifrost was Arm’s first scalar GPU architecture, departing from the previous generation’s (Midgard: T-600, 700 & 800 series) vector instruction design. The change was fundamental and akin to what we saw desktop GPU vendors like AMD and Nvidia introduce with their new GCN and Tesla architectures last decade.

Unfortunately the first two generations of Bifrost, the Mali-G71 and subsequent G72 weren’t very good GPUs. Arm’s two leading licensees, HiSilicon and Samsung, both came out with quite disappointing SoCs when it came to their GPUs these two generations. The Kirin 960 and 970 in particular were extremely bad in this regard and I’d argue it had quite a lot of impact on Huawei and Honor’s product planning and marketing.

GFXBench Aztec Ruins - Normal - Vulkan/Metal - Off-screen

GFXBench Manhattan 3.1 Offscreen Power Efficiency
(System Active Power)
  Mfc. Process FPS Avg. Power
(W)
Perf/W
Efficiency
iPhone XS (A12) Warm 7FF 76.51 3.79 20.18 fps/W
iPhone XS (A12) Cold / Peak 7FF 103.83 5.98 17.36 fps/W
Galaxy 10+ (Snapdragon 855) 7FF 70.67 4.88 14.46 fps/W
Galaxy 10+ (Exynos 9820) 8LPP 68.87 5.10 13.48 fps/W
Galaxy S9+ (Snapdragon 845) 10LPP 61.16 5.01 11.99 fps/W
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Kirin 980) 7FF 54.54 4.57 11.93 fps/W
Galaxy S9 (Exynos 9810) 10LPP 46.04 4.08 11.28 fps/W
Galaxy S8 (Snapdragon 835) 10LPE 38.90 3.79 10.26 fps/W
LeEco Le Pro3 (Snapdragon 821) 14LPP 33.04 4.18 7.90 fps/W
Galaxy S7 (Snapdragon 820) 14LPP 30.98 3.98 7.78 fps/W
Huawei Mate 10 (Kirin 970) 10FF 37.66 6.33 5.94 fps/W
Galaxy S8 (Exynos 8895) 10LPE 42.49 7.35 5.78 fps/W
Galaxy S7 (Exynos 8890) 14LPP 29.41 5.95 4.94 fps/W
Meizu PRO 5 (Exynos 7420) 14LPE 14.45 3.47 4.16 fps/W
Nexus 6P (Snapdragon 810 v2.1) 20Soc 21.94 5.44 4.03 fps/W
Huawei Mate 8 (Kirin 950) 16FF+ 10.37 2.75 3.77 fps/W
Huawei Mate 9 (Kirin 960) 16FFC 32.49 8.63 3.77 fps/W
Huawei P9 (Kirin 955) 16FF+ 10.59 2.98 3.55 fps/W

The last iteration of the Bifrost architecture, the Mali-G76 was a more significant jump for Arm and the IP was largely able to resolve some of the critical issues of its predecessors, resulting in relatively good results for the Exynos 9820 and Kirin 980 chipsets.

Unfortunately while Arm was catching up and fixing Bifrost’s issues, the competition didn’t merely hold still and was pushing the envelope. Qualcomm’s Adreno GPU architecture had been leading the mobile landscape for several years now, and even though the Adreno 640 didn’t post quite as impressive improvements this year, it’s still clearly leading Arm in terms of performance, efficiency and density. More worrisome is the fact that Apple’s GPU in the A12 was an absolutely major jump in terms of performance and efficiency, performing massively better than even Qualcomm’s best, not to speak of Arm’s own Mali GPUs.

Introducing Valhall – A major revamp

Today we’ll be covering Arm’s brand-new GPU architecture: Valhall (anglicized version of the old Norse Valhöll, a.k.a. Valhalla).  The new architecture brings a brand-new ISA and compute core design that tries to address the major shortcomings of the Bifrost architecture, and looks to be a lot more similar to the design approaches we saw adopted by other GPU vendors.

The first iteration of the Valhall GPU is the new Mali-G77 which will implement all of the architectural and micro-architectural improvements we’ll be discussing today.

What’s being promised is a 30% gain in energy efficiency as well as area density (at ISO-performance & process) and a 60% increase in performance of machine learning inferencing workloads on the GPU.

More interestingly, upcoming end-of-2019 and 2020 SoCs are projected to see a 40% increase in performance over 2019 devices. Next-generation SoCs are projected to have only minor process node improvements, so most of the gains quoted here are due to the architectural and microarchitectural leaps made by the new Mali-G77 GPU.

Introducing Valhall: A New Compute Core & New ISA
POST A COMMENT

42 Comments

View All Comments

  • jackthepumpkinking6sic6 - Friday, May 31, 2019 - link

    I already stated that the exynos back then was named hummingbird and that it used power vr.
    Worst battery life???
    Come back when you have anything useful, relevant, or even somewhat factual to contribute.
    Reply
  • jackthepumpkinking6sic6 - Thursday, May 30, 2019 - link

    Some of this may have been some based on implementation but that's half the battle Reply
  • jackthepumpkinking6sic6 - Thursday, May 30, 2019 - link

    Actually s1 exynos formally known as hummingbird was power vr.
    However yes in s1, s2, and other generations despite the extreme denial of most were very competitive in gpu. Let alone cpu, efficiency, and audio.
    Reply
  • GlossGhost - Thursday, June 06, 2019 - link

    I loved the Hummingbird, it was pretty powerful in the GPU side of things and I remember it crushing the benchmarks at the time. Maybe it's all fogged memories. Reply
  • Lodix - Monday, May 27, 2019 - link

    Andrei, are you still expecting HiSilicon to launch a Kirin SOC using ARM IP later this year with all that is happening ? It is very sad the current situation. Reply
  • Andrei Frumusanu - Monday, May 27, 2019 - link

    The SoC certainly is ready to go to manufacturing. What happens with devices is another question. Reply
  • jjj - Monday, May 27, 2019 - link

    China not defending Huawei at any cost would mean that China accepts to be poor forever and their society is too evolved for that. They can't allow for any Chinese corporation that gains scale to be killed off by hateful idiots living in the past.
    There is a lot of hysteria but Huawei will be fine even if China has to crash the global economy to protect them.
    Reply
  • Alexvrb - Monday, May 27, 2019 - link

    Huawei got caught with their hand in the Chinese state-sponsored backdoor cookie jar. That was ultimately their undoing. There's tons of big Chinese corporations, even if Huawei collapses they will just be absorbed into other companies. Reply
  • ZolaIII - Tuesday, May 28, 2019 - link

    & those are? Who cought them? Germany for instance didn't but they caught US one the Cisco. Their is a ton of huge US corporations in China and state property low. Reply
  • costeakai - Monday, May 27, 2019 - link

    good question , at least for these days. Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now