Are there any benchmarks or reviews that indicate if there is any benefit to the consumer in an F-series processor? Does it use slightly less power, does it run at lower TDP, etc.?
Love the i3-9100T @ 35W, but AMD's APU architecture gets reorganized every 6 months. Unfortunately both CPU's can't run Win7 or 8.1 because I can't stand Win10.
Intel's benchmarks are vs. a 3 year old system and their claiming upwards of 30%. That means it Kaby Lake vs. Kaby Lake Refresh * 3 (Coffee Lake), so where's the performance coming from?
@Ian can you guys check this when you do bench some of these? It's a real mystery to me, no bashing of either side intended.
As you asked. Will be good to have a i5 9600 analisys. At the first moment I think is the best alternative for a medium system. I really think that intel has serious problems for innovation. The 6th 7th and 8th series could be better alternatives bought on outlet or used. At the same Ghz nearly same performance. 1-5% difference is like SAME performance. Intel, really are you kidding us? My next cpu will be amd, not happened in the last 20 years. Hi everybody. I'm no usually post anything but this time intel really dissappoints. Good work.
In Intel 9th Gen Core Processors: All the Desktop and Mobile 45W CPUs Announced page on paragraph 5, at this word "Core i7-9750H supports ‘Partial Overclocking’". I think you type incorrect so that correct is Core i7-9750H Right?
We’ve updated our terms. By continuing to use the site and/or by logging into your account, you agree to the Site’s updated Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
135 Comments
View All Comments
mpbrede - Friday, April 26, 2019 - link
Are there any benchmarks or reviews that indicate if there is any benefit to the consumer in an F-series processor? Does it use slightly less power, does it run at lower TDP, etc.?albert89 - Saturday, April 27, 2019 - link
Love the i3-9100T @ 35W, but AMD's APU architecturegets reorganized every 6 months. Unfortunately both
CPU's can't run Win7 or 8.1 because I can't stand Win10.
ballsystemlord - Saturday, April 27, 2019 - link
Intel's benchmarks are vs. a 3 year old system and their claiming upwards of 30%. That means it Kaby Lake vs. Kaby Lake Refresh * 3 (Coffee Lake), so where's the performance coming from?@Ian can you guys check this when you do bench some of these? It's a real mystery to me, no bashing of either side intended.
Thanks
Esteban Gonzalez - Sunday, May 5, 2019 - link
As you asked. Will be good to have a i5 9600 analisys. At the first moment I think is the best alternative for a medium system. I really think that intel has serious problems for innovation. The 6th 7th and 8th series could be better alternatives bought on outlet or used. At the same Ghz nearly same performance. 1-5% difference is like SAME performance. Intel, really are you kidding us? My next cpu will be amd, not happened in the last 20 years. Hi everybody. I'm no usually post anything but this time intel really dissappoints. Good work.Thanawat1997 - Saturday, May 11, 2019 - link
In Intel 9th Gen Core Processors: All the Desktop and Mobile 45W CPUs Announced page on paragraph 5, at this word "Core i7-9750H supports ‘Partial Overclocking’". I think you type incorrect so that correct is Core i7-9750H Right?