System Performance

For system performance, we saw the Snapdragon 855 in the Galaxy S10 perform excellently, and there shouldn’t be any reason for the G8 to perform differently. It’s to be noted that the G8 is only our second Snapdragon 855 device we’ve received so the only comparison point we have is the Snapdragon variant of the S10.

Unfortunately, it looks like LG using an older version of the 855 BSP which is lacking some optimisations or lacking some configuration options which improve performance. Among the lacking features is the lack of boost mechanism for the top-app process groups, meaning the scheduler will be less aggressive than what we find on the Galaxy S10.

Let’s see how these differences end up affecting the G8’s performance:

PCMark Work 2.0 - Web Browsing 2.0

In PCMark’s web-browsing test, the difference ends up as quite major between the G8 and S10 as the former largely lags behind Samsung’s flagship, ending up with scores similar to the G7. The performance here reminds us of the initial benchmark scores from Qualcomm’s QRD855 reference platform in January, which also lacked some scheduler optimisations were commonplace in many of last year's Snapdragon 845 devices.

PCMark Work 2.0 - Video EditingPCMark Work 2.0 - Writing 2.0 PCMark Work 2.0 - Photo Editing 2.0 PCMark Work 2.0 - Data Manipulation PCMark Work 2.0 - Performance

In the subsequent tests and final PCMark performance score we see the LG G8 lag behind the Galaxy S10, again scoring similarly to the QRD platform.

JS Benchmarks

Speedometer 2.0 - OS WebViewWebXPRT 3 - OS WebView JetStream 2 - OS WebView

Since our review of the Galaxy S10 it seems Google has updated the system WebView to a newer version which has had a notable impact on performance, improving things by several performance points compared to a few months ago. We haven’t had the opportunity yet to update our database with the newest figures, which is why in some benchmarks the new G8 scores better than some previously reviewed devices.

In WebXPRT on the other hand we see the less aggressive scheduler settings overshadow the new WebView improvements, and the G8 again end up with worse performance than the Galaxy S10.

System performance verdict

Overall, I’ve actually been quite disappointed with the performance of the G8, even though the benchmarks rank it relatively highly among Android phones. The core issue here I think is software as seemingly the G8 is lacking some of the framework boosters and more aggressive scheduler settings found in competing devices.

Where this is most noticeable is when switching between applications or something as simple as browsing different views in applications. Here the G8 is not only noticeable slower as the new Galaxy S10 in both SoC variants, but it’s also noticeably slower than many of last year’s Snapdragon 855 devices.

What is most shocking however is the fact that the G8 feels slower than the G7. In side-by-side comparisons between the two phones, the G8 is slower in opening a lot of applications or in-app views. This is extremely disappointing and clearly points out that LG has messed up somewhere in terms of the SoC’s BSP integration.

We hope LG will address this in the future with a firmware update, however users shouldn’t be holding their breath on the matter.

Introduction & Design GPU Performance
POST A COMMENT

71 Comments

View All Comments

  • abufrejoval - Thursday, May 2, 2019 - link

    That is a very nice looking Ford Granada GLX!

    I sure did not expect one of those still in the wild, especially since the spare parts deposit burned down in 1977.

    Great review!

    LG earns a lot of respect that they keep on sending units to AT.
    Reply
  • klingon55 - Thursday, May 2, 2019 - link

    The LG G6 had an OLED display. So this is not the first. Reply
  • Andrei Frumusanu - Friday, May 3, 2019 - link

    The G6 was an LCD... Reply
  • 808Hilo - Thursday, May 2, 2019 - link

    Looks like a highly defective copy of my Essential ph-1. Which, after, 2 years, is still state of the art. I wonder why those large corps cannot make a single decent unflawed phone for a change. Reply
  • Wardrive86 - Saturday, May 4, 2019 - link

    Looks like LG is using the same heat dissipation pipe on the G7 and G8. Average 18% more GPU peak performance, average 18% more GPU sustained performance in essentially the same body. Impressive IMO Reply
  • dr_pingu - Sunday, May 5, 2019 - link

    Had a g4 with the classic bootloop. Company never admited the bad manufacturing (officially in Spain). OFC never buying nor recomending brands like that, they can crash asap imo Reply
  • vortmax2 - Tuesday, May 7, 2019 - link

    "Here the G8 is not only noticeable slower as the new Galaxy S10 in both SoC variants, but it’s also noticeably slower than many of last year’s Snapdragon 855 devices."

    Think you meant '845 devices'.
    Reply
  • KristenBrown - Wednesday, May 8, 2019 - link

    Awesome review! Reply
  • eventeca - Monday, May 13, 2019 - link

    It really bothers me that this review had no evaluation of how well the LG G8 will survive a drop, but it spends so much time talking about its 0.6 mm increase in the thickness, http://eventeca.com/ Reply
  • Mark Dirac - Monday, May 13, 2019 - link

    Why on earth do LG not simply permit disabling of the camera's over sharpening? My LG G6's images were so dreadful that I didn't bother taking any photos with it for 6 months, until Open Camera introduced the capability to switch off the LG G6's sharpening and noise reduction (Camera2 API). At which point I found I had a pretty good camera. Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now