Today at GDC, Google announced its new video game streaming service. The new service will be called Stadia. This builds on the information earlier this year that AMD was powering Project Stream (as was then called) with Radeon Pro GPUs, and now Google is confirming the project is a primary partner using AMD’s next generation GPUs. (Edit: AMD reached out to confirm that their press release only mentioned GPUs.)

Stadia is being advertised as the central community for gamers, creators, and developers. The idea is that people can play a wide array of games regardless of the hardware at hand. Back in October, Google debuted the technology showcasing a top-end AAA gaming title running at 60 FPS. Google wants a single place where gamers and YouTube creators can get together – no current gaming platform, according to Google, does this.

Ultimately Google wants to stream straight to the Google browser. Google worked with leading publishers and developers to help build the system infrastructure. Google is one of a few companies with enough content delivery networks around the world to ensure that frame rates are kept high with super low latency.

Users will be able to watch a video about a game, and instantly hit ‘Play Now’ and start playing the game in under five seconds without any download and lag. The idea is that a single code base can be enjoyed at any stream. At launch, desktop, laptop, TV, tablets, and phones will be supported. With Stadia, the datacenter is platform. No hardware acceleration is required on the device. The experience can be transferred between devices, such as chromebook to smartphone.

One of the highlights of Google’s demonstration of Stadia was the platform working on Google-enabled TVs.

The platform allows users to have any USB connected controller, or mouse and keyboard. Google will also be releasing its own Stadia Controller, available in three colors – white, black, and light blue. The controller connects via Wi-Fi straight into the cloud, and also which device is being run (it’s unclear how this works).

The controller has two new buttons. The first allows saving and sharing the experience out to YouTube. The second is Google Assistant, using the integrated microphone in the controller. This allows game developers to integrate Google Assistant into their games. It also allows users to ask Google when they need help in a game - and the assistant will look for a guide to help.

Stadia uses the same datacenter infrastructure already in place at Google. There are 7500+ edge nodes allows for compute resources being closer to players for lower latency. Custom designed, purpose built hardware powers the experience. Interconnected racks have sufficient compute and memory for the most demanding games. The technology has been in development inside Google for years.

At launch, resolutions will be supported up to 4K 60 fps with HDR and surround sound. Future  plans for up to 8K streaming at 120 fps are planned. The platform has been built to scale to support this. While playing, the stream is duplicated in 4K for direct upload – you get rendering quality video rather than what you capture locally.

The platform is instance based, so Google can scale when needed. Game developers no longer have to worry about building to a specific hardware performance – the datacenter can scale as required.

Sadia is powered by a custom AMD GPU with 10 TFLOPS of power, with a custom CPU with AVX2 support. Combined they create a single instance per person. Uses Linux and Vulkan, with full Unreal and Unity support. Havok engine support as well. Tool companies are onboard.

At a high level, the specifications for the GPU are almost a shoe-in for AMD's Radeon Vega 56, right down to the number of CUs and compute throughput. So while not confirmed, it's very likely that Google is using some kind of Vega 10 card; probably a variant of the Radeon Instinct MI25.

However it's notable (and unusual) that Google is only announcing their partner for the GPU and not the CPU. With AMD capable of delivering solid products in both categories, one would consider them a shoe-in for the CPU as well since they're already providing the GPU. However Google's announcement took special care not to announce the CPU partner, and even AMD emailed us that they could only confirm the use of AMD GPUs. So whether Google's CPU vendor is Intel or AMD remains to be seen. There are good arguments for each based on the vague specifications, though with AVX 2 support listed, if it is AMD then that would mean that Google has gotten their hands on some early Zen 2 CPUs.

One of the first games supported will be Doom Eternal from id Software, which will support 4K with HDR at 60 fps. Every user will get a single GPU with no other users.

UL Benchmarks (3DMark) has been working with Google to help benchmark the systems and measure the power of the infrastructure. Developers if required can use multiple GPUs, it appears.

Multiplayer is also supported, at least between different Stadia players. Distributed physics becomes possible, which means up to 1000 players in Battle Royale titles. There’s also the advantage, according to Google, of getting around hackers and cheaters.

Developers can support multi-platform multiplayer, and transfer save files between platforms. Game developers have already been working on MP demos with destructive environments using real-time rigid body physics, allowing for perfect synchronization.

Google also points out that split-screen gaming has not been a priority recently because of rendering two scenes at once. With Stadia, that problem disappears, as each player will be powered by a separate instance, reviving the idea of local co-op and squad based gaming. This also allows for multiple cameras for a single player to navigate a single map, for better tactics in certain types of games. Google says that this ability allows developers to create new types of games.

Built on Google’s platform, Stadia will also support machine learning. For developers that want to take advantage, they can incorporate Google and third-party libraries to help improve games over time and enhance the experience both on a per-user level and on a local/global scale.

The other focus on Stadia is the interaction with YouTube. Google points out that gaming has been a fundamental part of YouTube since its exception, and it is Google’s goal to help creators interact with (and monetize) their audience. The idea is that creators can directly livestream from Stadia, as well as play with creators through Stadia. ‘Crowd Play’ will allow users to play directly into the server instance with the creator – it acts like a lobby, so players will sit in line to play with their favorite creator. For example, the NBA2K above shows 'join this game (3rd in line)'.

Google states that any link from any location can act as a launch point for a title. This means that developers do not have to be limited to a single game store – games can be launched from almost anywhere, as long as the user is in an up to date Chrome browser. Google is also set to put extensive parental controls into the mix.

Google will be creating an entity called ‘Stadia Games and Entertainment’, headed up by Jade Raymond, enabling first party studios to use Stadia. Other partner studios will also work through the new division as outreach in order to enable game development on Stadia.

Developers who want to create for Stadia should go to stadia.dev to sign up for tools and resources. Stadia Partners for distributers. Stadia.com will be the hub for gamers.

Stadia will launch in 2019, in the US, Canada, UK, and most of Europe. No word on pricing yet, but Google will be announcing more in the Summer.

 

 

Comments Locked

144 Comments

View All Comments

  • abufrejoval - Tuesday, March 19, 2019 - link

    Visual latency may be an issue that Google seems confident to combat, given that they have invested heavily into cutting latency up to the point where evidently they give out connectivity kits to TelCos, because it's cheaper to give those away than compensate latency on their side (I remember a very clear quote from Eric Brewer in that sense).

    But with games drifting towards giant open world maps with massive amounts of users, model latency becomes a much bigger issue: What's the use of 144FPS if no two systems can agree on where players stand in the game space?

    And while the amount of data that may need to be exchanged to update model data is much more difficult to control, the requirements for streaming the video are pretty flat and much better to control.

    I still think Google needs to be broken up in many more letters than a simple Alphabet, but technologically this makes ever so much sense.
  • Mccaula718 - Tuesday, March 19, 2019 - link

    I played their beta for the new Assassin's Creed and am located in Morgantown WV. It was completely playable with compressed images happening occasionally. They gave everyone in the beta a free Uplay copy afterwards. Definitely looks better locally, but it requires a good rig. I can see this for people who can't afford an expensive computer or don't want to upgrade. If the local copy gets a 10/10 for visuals, I'd give the stream 8/10.
  • Mccaula718 - Tuesday, March 19, 2019 - link

    That's on hardwired Comcast that speed tests around 175/15 Mbps
  • pixelstuff - Tuesday, March 19, 2019 - link

    Google's name might be big enough to make this seem reliable, but I'm seeing more and more a need for a MoviesAnywhere type system of Game licensing. Pay for the perpetual license once and then play on any platform that the game has been ported to.

    I'm fine paying a monthly fee to use Google's hardware to play a game, but don't see re-paying for games I have already purchased, and I'm not sure I would want to pay $50+ for a game exclusively on Stadia with no offline capability.

    If the service is like Netflix where $10-15/mo gives full access to all available games then it might be appealing. If the price is at all higher, or if you have to buy a game license and also maintain a monthly service fee, then I'm not sure it will attract me at all.
  • Yojimbo - Tuesday, March 19, 2019 - link

    Google has data centers all over the world and they control a good chunk of the internet backbone. That, along with their data center expertise, is what will make it reliable. Their name might be enough to convince big developers to develop for what is essentially another console.

    Microsoft also has the data centers and expertise to do such a thing, though I believe they don't have the backbone. They wouldn't even need to develop all the technology like Google did, because NVIDIA already has it. They could just partner with NVIDIA. Microsoft can also make it like developing for the XBox therefore making it easier for developers already targeting the XBox.
  • abufrejoval - Wednesday, March 20, 2019 - link

    If you read the small print, you may notice that you didn't actually purchase a game.You just purchased a temporary restricted right to use while you signed away the right to your private data for life, yours and your progeny, should you remember to have any.

    Purchase is iNdentured iServitude or even iSlavery these days.
  • nevcairiel - Tuesday, March 19, 2019 - link

    Is it just me, or does 2.7GHz seem pretty low for a gaming setup?

    I guess they have no choice really if they want density, since those high-core-count chips just don't clock that high, but I wonder if that won't result in a problem somewhere. Of course they could just force quality down to make it work, but they seem to want to promise more quality.
  • Yojimbo - Tuesday, March 19, 2019 - link

    Consoles get away with weak CPUs. This thing is basically a console hosted in the cloud with some controller software allowing multiple consoles to be lashed together.
  • Jon Tseng - Wednesday, March 20, 2019 - link

    Datacenter CPUs typically clock lower than desktop/enthusiast. You want to run for max power efficiency not for max performance. Suspect the margins c1Ghz to get to peak clock will dump out a ton more heat than the first 2.7 Ghz..
  • Zoolook - Wednesday, March 20, 2019 - link

    2.7 Ghz should be plenty for 60fps, esp. if it's Zen2

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now