Retail drives based on the Silicon Motion SM2262EN controller have arrived. The ADATA SX8200 Pro and HP EX950 are nearly identical drives that are replacing last year's flagship models from both brands.

Silicon Motion's first NVMe SSD controller felt very much like a version 1.0 product. Despite any PR and marketing to the contrary, none of the products which used that SM2260 controller were able to compete with high-end drives like those from Samsung. Silicon Motion (SMI) followed it up last year with a second generation of controllers that completely changed the game: drives using the high-end SM2262 controller were able to set several performance records while being far more affordable than NVMe SSDs from the top brands. Now a new wave of high-end SMI-based drives has arrived, powered by the SM2262EN controller, a minor update to the SM2262 that makes it essentially version 2.1 of Silicon Motion's NVMe controller architecture.

Comparing and Contrasting Two Near-Identical High-End Drives 

Last year we reviewed an engineering sample of the SM2262EN platform with an early firmware version. Today we're looking at two final retail products based on the same controller. The ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro and HP EX950 are direct replacements for two of the most successful NVMe SSDs from last year (the SX8200 and EX920, which used the older SM2262 controller). Together, those two drives have dominated the consumer NVMe market for almost a year with the best combination of high performance and reasonable prices.

Silicon Motion still hasn't detailed what if any hardware changes the SM2262EN brings; it's still an 8-channel NVMe controller with a PCIe 3.0 x4 host interface and a pair of Arm Cortex-R series processor cores. What has changed drastically is the firmware, which Silicon Motion has tuned to provide the highest peak performance possible. This lets drive vendors advertise performance specs that rival the fastest flash-based SSDs on the market, but those specs usually don't have much relation to real-world performance. SM2262EN controller and firmware platform makes very different tradeoffs than the SM2262, and the improvements to peak performance on the SM2262EN have unavoidable costs elsewhere.

Silicon Motion SM2262(EN) Controller Block Diagram

The most significant advertised improvements for SM2262EN drives over their predecessors are to write speeds, with both sequential and random write performance increasing by 50% or more. Sequential and random reads have also improved, but by a more modest 10–20%. Aside from these changes, the new SM2262EN drives are drop-in replacements for the outgoing models, with similar write endurance and power consumption ratings. Prices are higher for the new models due simply to their novelty, but we expect them to fall back down to the same levels as their predecessors once supplies of the older models start to dry up (and this is already happening for some capacities).

The ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro

ADATA's gaming brand, XPG, has now been releasing storage drives for a number of generations. The older SX8200 was popular, and in December the company launched an entry level SX6000 Lite for the low cost market. The SX8200 is set to spring as an XPG performance drive, offering capacities from 256GB to 2TB.

ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro Specifications
Capacity 256 GB 512 GB 1 TB
(1024 GB)
2 TB
Controller Silicon Motion SM2262EN
NAND Flash Intel/Micron 64L 3D TLC
Form-Factor, Interface double-sided M.2 2280 PCIe 3 x4 NVMe 1.3
Sequential Read 3500 MB/s 3500 MB/s 3500 MB/s TBD
Sequential Write 1200 MB/s 2300 MB/s 3000 MB/s TBD
Random Read 220k IOPS 390k IOPS 390k IOPS TBD
Random Write 290k IOPS 380k IOPS 380k IOPS TBD
Warranty 5 years
Write Endurance 160 TB
0.34 DWPD
320 TB
0.34 DWPD
640 TB
0.34 DWPD
TBD

The first three drives are first out of the gate, while the 2TB model will be on shelves later this year. For this review, we are testing the 1TB model, which uses the SM2262EN controller and IMFT 64-layer 3D TLC NAND.

The HP EX950

 

Normally HP is a name users might associate with pure OEM builds and designs, however the company has two avenues for its SSD business: to itself for its own systems, or directly to system integrators or end users. As with the other drive in this test, the EX950 is replacing a very popular drive, the EX920. HP will be offering three models, from 512GB to 2TB.

HP EX950 Specifications
Capacity 512 GB 1 TB
(1024 GB)
2 TB
(2000 GB)
Controller Silicon Motion SM2262EN
NAND Flash Intel/Micron 64L 3D TLC
Form-Factor, Interface double-sided M.2 2280 PCIe 3 x4 NVMe 1.3
Sequential Read 3500 MB/s 3500 MB/s 3500 MB/s
Sequential Write 2250 MB/s 2900 MB/s 2900 MB/s
Random Read 390k IOPS 410k IOPS 410k IOPS
Random Write 370k IOPS 370k IOPS 380k IOPS
Power Consumption Active 5.21 W 6.93 W 6.93 W
Idle 0.73 W 0.73 W 0.73 W
Warranty 5 years
Write Endurance 320 TB
0.34 DWPD
650 TB
0.36 DWPD
1400 TB
0.38 DWPD

All three drives are being launched simultaneously, using the SM2262EN controller and IMFT's 64-layer 3D TLC NAND. For this review, we have the 1TB and 2TB drives for testing.

Similarities and Differences

The specifications for the ADATA and HP drives are very similar, but there are a few minor differences. HP has dropped the 256GB model, so their lineup now starts at 512GB. Both companies have added a 2TB model, though ADATA's 2TB is not yet available and thus we don't have exact performance and endurance numbers for that one. ADATA's sequential and random write speed ratings are slightly higher, and HP's random read ratings for the 1TB and 2TB models are a bit higher. The 2TB HP EX950 is a bit unusual by offering only about 2000GB of usable space, when the smaller capacities and the ADATA drives use standard power of two capacities (~1024GB for the 1TB models). Furthermore, the 2TB HP EX950 is actually about 310MB smaller than a typical 2000GB drive.

As usual, ADATA also has a more gamer-oriented model called the XPG GAMMIX S11 Pro, which differs only by the inclusion of a fancier heatspreader. The SX8200 Pro ships with a flat black heatspreader for the user to install, and the HP EX950 has no heatspreader except what is built in to the controller package.


ADATA 1TB, HP 1TB, HP 2TB

The ADATA SX8200 Pro and HP EX950 use slightly different PCBs from each other, but matching the board layouts for their predecessors. ADATA has customized the layout a bit more, putting the controller a bit closer to the M.2 connector and more of the small power regulation components between the controller and NAND. The HP drives have a layout that is very close to Silicon Motion's reference design, down to the pair of LEDs in the middle of the card that blink when the drive is active. These drives are all double-sided, so they are not intended for use in the thinnest ultrabooks.

The 2TB engineering sample we tested last year used DDR4 DRAM, but neither of the retail products makes the switch from DDR3. The 1TB samples all use Nanya DRAM but the 2TB EX950 uses denser Micron DRAM. HP usually puts their own logo onto SMI controllers, but our review samples use the standard packaging with Silicon Motion's logo and part numbers. ADATA does their own NAND binning and puts their logo on the packages. The HP drives are using unbranded packages with standard IMFT part numbers for their 64-layer 3D TLC NAND.

AnandTech 2018 Consumer SSD Testbed
CPU Intel Xeon E3 1240 v5
Motherboard ASRock Fatal1ty E3V5 Performance Gaming/OC
Chipset Intel C232
Memory 4x 8GB G.SKILL Ripjaws DDR4-2400 CL15
Graphics AMD Radeon HD 5450, 1920x1200@60Hz
Software Windows 10 x64, version 1709
Linux kernel version 4.14, fio version 3.6
Spectre/Meltdown microcode and OS patches current as of May 2018
SLC Cache Sizes & SYSmark 2018
POST A COMMENT

42 Comments

View All Comments

  • DigitalFreak - Wednesday, February 06, 2019 - link

    Billy - how far are we away from having 4TB M.2 NVMe drives? Reply
  • Billy Tallis - Wednesday, February 06, 2019 - link

    Most SSD vendors could produce 4TB double-sided M.2 drives using off the shelf parts. Putting 4TB on a single-sided module would require either going with a DRAMless controller, stacking DRAM and the controller on the same package, or using 1Tb+ QLC dies instead of TLC.

    So currently any 4TB M.2 drive would have at least some significant downside that either compromises performance, restricts compatibility, or drives the price up well beyond twice that of a 2TB M.2 drive. There's simply not enough demand for such drives, and likely won't be anytime soon.
    Reply
  • Mikewind Dale - Wednesday, February 06, 2019 - link

    That drop in performance for a full drive in the Heavy - and even the Light!! - tests is worrying. They're right around the level of a SATA SSD.

    My question is, how full is full? If you fill the drive up 99%, is its performance closer to empty or full? With all my SSDs, I typically leave about 10% of the drive unallocated (unpartitioned). How would the drive perform in this state?

    I would be interested in seeing results for a drive that is almost full, but not quite full. I imagine that most people don't use their drives up until the final MB is used. Still, if a cost-conscious person is trying to get their money's worth, they might use the drive until it's 90-something percent full. Until recently, I was using a 512 GB SATA SSD with a real capacity of 476.8 GB. I used it until I was using 420 GB, at which point I upgraded to a 2 TB drive. So I was using 88% of its capacity. To me, that seems like a reasonable usage to test - not quite full, but almost full.
    Reply
  • Targon - Wednesday, February 06, 2019 - link

    I would suspect that the reason for this might be thermal throttle issues. Throw a heat sink on there, and the performance downgrade might disappear. The versions with a pre-installed heatsink might be worth the money, depending on how much it would cost to buy a SSD heatsink at this point(I haven't looked). Reply
  • BillyONeal - Wednesday, February 06, 2019 - link

    Seems more likely to be reduction in the size of the SLC cache -- see the the filling the drive tests where there are 3 distinct phases depending on how much space is actually in use. Reply
  • jabber - Thursday, February 07, 2019 - link

    I must admit I still leave a few GB spare/unallocated on any SSD I install. 2GB on a 120GB, 4GB on a 240GB and 8GB on a 500GB. Old habits. Reply
  • reactor_au - Thursday, June 13, 2019 - link

    I was wondering the same thing, how full can one get before performance drops off the cliff like in the benchmarks? Its a very import detail to omit! Reply
  • Mikewind Dale - Wednesday, February 06, 2019 - link

    I also notice that these drives don't have an active power state less than 3.8W. That's unfortunate, because as Ganesh T S noted in his Anandtech review of the MyDigitalSSD M2X M.2 NVMe SSD Enclosure, that enclosure will only work with SSDs that have an active power state less than 3.8W.

    I think this is important because it determines whether you can continue to use the SSD as a portable drive after you upgrade later. If you replace your 2 TB with a 4 or 8 TB SSD someday in the future, it will be nice to know that you can repurpose your 2 TB as an external drive.

    Also, it determines whether you can easily upgrade your SSD when all your M.2 slots are full. Whenever I upgrade a SATA boot drive, I typically use an external USB enclosure to clone the current SATA drive (still installed internally) to the new SATA drive (inside the enclosure). Then I can swap the two drives, and my computer will transparently use the new drive. With M.2, this is even more important because many motherboards have only two M.2 sockets. So if you have both M.2 sockets filled and try to upgrade one of the M.2 drives, you'll have a bit of a challenge. You could buy a PCIe-M.2 card and use that, but using an external USB enclosure is more convenient.

    So I'd like to see more M.2 drives with a sub-3.8 W active power state. The Samsung 970 EVO Plus has a 3.4 W active state, so it passes this test.
    Reply
  • MrSpadge - Wednesday, February 06, 2019 - link

    I love ADATA's naming scheme! It's so easily memorable and has more X's than any other brand. Reply
  • eddieobscurant - Wednesday, February 06, 2019 - link

    Nice review , as always although I disagree with your conclusion. Peak performance is what most people want. Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now