For the final day of Qualcomm’s 3rd Annual Tech Summit, the focus is on its Always Connected PC (ACPC) platform. This is Qualcomm’s attempt to bring mobile processors to standard laptops by enabling Windows on Snapdragon devices. So far we have seen two generations of processors, both based on the preceding mobile chip for flexibility. Now Qualcomm has announced that the ACPC market will get its own dedicated chip, called the Snapdragon 8cx. Here’s what we know.

Snapdragon 8cx: World’s First Laptop 7nm SoC

The two previous ACPC chips from Qualcomm, the S835 and the S850, were simple enough to follow: put the mobile processor into a device that allows for higher power, but use the efficiency to extend battery life and the integrated modem to provide a smartphone-like always connected device. Rather than use Android, Qualcomm worked with Microsoft to enable a version of Windows that ran on the chips as well as working with software partners to enable their software on the device – for everything else, there’s an emulation layer if the software was built for x86 processors.

With this idea, Qualcomm was always reliant on two things: the most common software being natively supported, and for everything else efficient machine translation. The best way to speed either of those up is to use a more powerful processor, preferably one with a higher power budget and better efficiency point to squeeze the frequency out. This is what the Snapdragon 8cx is all about. Qualcomm stated that the 8cx will sit above the S850 in a new higher power category, rather than directly replace it.

For the name, c = Compute, and x = eXtreme. Just in case you were wondering.

The new 8cx is built off of many of the same base elements as the Snapdragon 855 announced yesterday, but the 8cx is a larger chip with a number of key features expanded and enhanced for the intended market segments.

Starting with the CPU, this chip has eight next-generation Kryo 495 cores, split into four performance cores and four efficiency cores. Qualcomm states that these are the fastest Kryo cores the company has ever built, although at the time of writing the microarchitecture and frequencies have not been disclosed. (Update: the demo systems being used stated a peak big CPU speed of 2.75 GHz, although we were told by Qualcomm that the final speed will depend on the OEM implementation, so we're likely dealing with a configurable TDP.) We know that these cores are Arm v8.1-based, likely A76-variants designed under Arm’s program that offers some custom tweaking of the design for specific customers. In the presentation, Qualcomm stated that there is a total of 10 MB of cache, but doesn’t break it down into exactly where that cache is, however the system cache and L3 cache is listed as ‘larger’ than before.

On the GPU, the new Adreno 680 graphics inside are only discussed in terms of performance metrics relative to previous platforms: we were told that the graphics are 2x faster than Snapdragon 850, 3.5x faster than the Snapdragon 835, and 60% more power efficient than the Snapdragon 850 (some of which will come from the process node). The new design was labelled as Qualcomm’s biggest leap in performance per watt in graphics technology ever, and that the Adreno 680 is Qualcomm’s most powerful GPU ever produced. This GPU also uses double the number of transistors of the previous generation.

Other headline features for the graphics includes support for the latest Vulkan 1.1 and DirectX 12 APIs, full VP9 and H.265 decode, a ‘high efficiency’ video encoder, and support for dual 4K HDR external displays.

Feeding the graphics is the memory, and Qualcomm is doubling the memory width for this new chip. Rather than a 64-bit wide interface, split as 4x16-bit channels, the Snapdragon 8cx will have a 128-bit wide interface, split as 8x16-bit channels. This interface will support up to 16GB of LPDDR4X, although at what speed we’re not sure. One of the criticisms of the previous generations of ACPC devices was the memory bandwidth – especially as Qualcomm’s competitors in this space routinely use 128-bit wide interfaces – so this should help tremendously both in day-to-day performance and in graphics performance.

The Snapdragon 8cx will support both UFS 3.0 storage and NVMe SSD storage, along with having an additional PCIe 3.0 x4 connection so OEMs can add external controllers. When I questioned Qualcomm if something like Thunderbolt 3 was possible, they said that they don’t see why it wouldn’t be if an OEM wanted to make that configuration.

Being built from mobile SoC principles means that the chip also has an integrated modem, and we get the Snapdragon X24 LTE modem similar to the S855 chip launched yesterday. This chip can support up to 2 Gbps download of LTE connectivity, using 7xCA and 4x4 MIMO on five of those streams. Peak upload speed is listed as 316 Mbps with 3x20 MHz CA. The 8cx will support 5G when the X50 modem is paired with it, however not much noise was mentioned on this given the 5G focus of the first day of the event. Beyond this is 802.11ac Wave support, although 802.11ax-ready support is not listed. Bluetooth 5.0 is also supported.

Qualcomm was very keen to announce full support for Windows 10 Enterprise, and expects the Snapdragon 8cx to push into the Enterprise/Commercial space given the focus on manageability and security that the OS provides. This is the proverbial shot across the bow of Intel’s commercial business, which sells millions of units every year. Qualcomm was keen to provide some performance and power numbers, symbolising better performance at 7W compared to Intel at a much lower power. No live demo was provided it should be said, but Qualcomm is making some bold claims that we're eager to check.

In the videos during the keynote presentation, a number of form factors were shown, including what looked like a Lenovo-based dual display unit and even a Surface like design. None of the partners on the stage were willing to discuss what their plans are for the Snapdragon 8cx right now, and the only inkling of an 8cx device we saw in the demo room was Qualcomm’s reference design, with the OEM they are using covered up.

This looked like a common clamshell design, and Qualcomm stated that they will be rolling out these reference designs internally to employees (replacing their current mobile devices) as they put the final touches the firmware and software.

One of the key metrics for the ACPC market to succeed is software, and Qualcomm invited Microsoft and Symantec to the keynote to discuss the future partnerships. With Windows 10 Enterprise now supported on the 8cx, it was pointed out that Office 365 and other Azure features are now optimized for the platform. Qualcomm said they are working with more app developers than ever for natively compiled software, especially in the entertainment space, as well as native browsers. The company pointed out that it is working extensively with Firefox for an optimized experience.

Given the amount of detail provided (and some obvious detail not provided), it’s clear that the Snapdragon 8cx platform isn’t quite ready for prime time. The net result being that Qualcomm is holding back on talking about specific architectural details, and clockspeeds almost certainly have yet to be dialed in, which means they have to be vauge about performance as well.

Based on previous experience, we’re likely to hear announcements perhaps at MWC in late February at the earliest. While production ramp of devices I would expect in the Computex / June time frame.

For what it’s worth, Qualcomm also had a wafer of the 8cx on display in the demo area. Based on our calculations, which you can read here, this looks to be the biggest a large mobile chip made on TSMC’s newest 7nm process. We're going to see if we can get information about frequencies and cache sizes. Will update if we can.

Related Reading

POST A COMMENT

43 Comments

View All Comments

  • gaadikey - Friday, December 7, 2018 - link

    My friend Girish M Mani from Qualcomm India along with his 5 friends has designed this chip. I really appreciate the hard work the guys have put to turn this as reality. Reply
  • halcyon - Friday, December 7, 2018 - link

    Could this find it's way into an Android/Chromebook tablet (not convertible, not 2-1-in, not fan-cooled luggable laptop, not just ARM-Windows device)?

    I'd love for a poper Android/Chromebook tablet with a laminated 120Hz display and a pressure sensitive pen running this Chip.

    Don't want to do iOS/iPad anymore, already tried it and the OS is trying to gimp everything that I'm accustomed to doing.

    And ARM-based Windows tablets that weight 800g+ are not what I'm really looking for.

    Here's hoping this ends up in more than just development boards and ARM-Windows 2-in-1's.
    Reply
  • jjj - Friday, December 7, 2018 - link

    First thing first, get info on what cores they use. Just because they use the same 495 for all, it doesn't mean all are big cores.
    Anyway, bigger die and modem, add licenses, front end and so on and we get 1000$ machines with limited software functionality so good luck with that.
    If they had a SD675 with no modem for PC, that would be something that would not suck too much.
    This, this is something they can't sell and by the time the software is sufficient in PC, the PC is dead.Dumb strategy, huge waste of resources. If you want to prepare for glasses on the software side, in case M$ does well there, then at least make a PC SoC you can sell, don't sabotage your own goals with solutions that are not commercially viable due to the absurd price.
    Reply
  • peevee - Monday, December 10, 2018 - link

    Do you KNOW the price of the chip? It is probably below $100. Not a major part of a cost of a laptop. Reply
  • sing_electric - Friday, December 7, 2018 - link

    One of the arguments I've heard is that Apple's chips can outperform Qualcomm's because QC has to hit a specific price target on its SoC to keep OEMs happy - Apple doesn't, and can spread costs around more, hence, Apple can focus on performance rather than cost (and related issues like die size, etc.)

    I guess QC's efforts in this area will be the first test of that, since, based on system pricing, the real competitor is no longer other ARM chips but really something like an i5 laptop (which has additional costs for modems, etc. that are baked in to QC's SoC). If QC can't compete to win in THIS segment, it highly suggests that Apple's out-engineering them, rather than engineering for different objectives.
    Reply
  • Raqia - Friday, December 7, 2018 - link

    If you mean straightline CPU performance and efficiency, Apple is surely ahead of even Intel now. Apple knew it had more die space to play with as it doesn't have its own modem IP to put on die so it used that space for a much beefier CPU. They crammed a desktop class design into a mobile device, but there is a trade off: despite its superior efficiency, Apple forgot to throttle properly and the resulting current draw at heavy loads has been detrimental to battery life:

    https://bit.ly/2ryPO61

    This is great for first month bench-marketing for reviews, but not so much for users who weren't informed that this superior performance would only last through about a year of regular use.
    Apple likes to tout that its SoC is unique to the iPhone, but making a part used by many OEMs and software platforms means to me that tolerances are better and bugs more thoroughly reported and addressed.

    The CPU is mostly responsible for controlling program flow and more compute intensive operations are more efficiently performed in coprocessors on which die space is better used in mobile; memory related CPU scores are probably more relevant than ones that stress the ALUs and it sounds like Qualcomm's customizations to ARM's designs have been made precisely here. These show up on its excellent system level performance despite lower scores in focused "engine revving" benchmarks. Qualcomm has also been consistently superior in performance and efficiency when it comes to GPU, DSP, and modem (not even present on an AX die) but these don't show up on typical benchmark suites that continue to hew close to legacy 90's and 00's gaming PC style benchmarks focused mostly on CPU and GPU (although I don't blame anyone for this because those blocks are much less accessible than the CPU or GPU where there's cross platform benchmarks or recompilable content.)
    Reply
  • skavi - Friday, December 7, 2018 - link

    Exactly why I'm so excited for the numbers on this chip. Though we have to keep in mind that QC is using significant die space for the modem, and is (self) limited to the cores that ARM designs. Reply
  • dustwalker13 - Saturday, December 8, 2018 - link

    I really hope the next Surface Go will be on that Basis. It already is my perfect device for travel, only the battery life and connectivity could be better.

    The Go on ARM and the Pros on AMD with zen2 to get proper graphics support would be my dream setup.

    I know Intel is probably downright paying MS to use their core series at this point, but using an adapted apu in xbox and not for tablets is just a bad design decision at this point, especially when AMD is so aggressive with their cusom cpu/apu solutions, has way better graphics performance and would tailor an apu for the Surface lineup in a second.
    Reply
  • MutualCore - Saturday, December 8, 2018 - link

    The issue always remains - what is the software you will be able to run? Windows 10 on ARM is a 100% unknown at this point. Reply
  • Alexvrb - Saturday, December 8, 2018 - link

    You can run pretty much anything that you would run on a similar TDP Intel chip. That's the point of the hybrid emulation. But to get the best performance, it has to be recompiled. They're pushing devs in that direction, so yeah I'd also like to see the next-gen Surface Go use this chip or a successor.

    I also agree with him on the Pro models. Zen 2 APUs would be a huge boost where it needs it the most - the GPU!
    Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now