ATI Radeon 9100 IGP PRO Specifications



CPU INTERFACE
  • Up to 800MHz CPU FSB for Intel® Pentium® 4 Processor
  • Supports Intel® Hyper-ThreadingTM processors
SYSTEM LOGIC FEATURES
  • AGP 3.0 compliant AGP 8X interface
  • 266MB/second point-to-point interface to ATI IXP in A-Link mode
  • Unified Memory Architecture (UMA)
  • Dual channel 128-bit DDR SDRAM memory interface
  • DDR400 SDRAM support provides up to 6.4 GB/second bandwidth
  • Up to 4 GB DRAM support with two un-buffered SO-DIMMs
  • 16 MB to 128 MB of main memory configurable as display memory
  • Up to 8 USB 2.0 ports
  • Up to 2 SATA devices
  • Support for 6 channel AC-97 codecs
3D GRAPHICS FEATURES
  • Hardware with pixel shader 1.4 support
  • Supports up to 2048x1536 @ 32bpp.
  • Supports 3D textures and Microsoft® DirectX® texture compression
  • Anisotropic texture filtering and Full Screen Anti-Aliasing (FSAA)
VIDEO FEATURES
  • Integrated hardware motion compensation and iDCT
  • Enhanced MPEG-2 hardware decode
  • Hardware DVD sub-picture decode
2D GRAPHICS FEATURES
  • Highly optimized 128-bit 2D Engine
  • Supports a maximum resolution of 2048x1536 @ 32bpp.
DISPLAY CONTROLLER
  • Dual CRT controllers provide independent dual display support
  • Integrated high precision 300MHz triple 10-bit DAC supports resolutions up to 2048x1536
FLAT PANEL MONITOR SUPPORT
  • 12-bit digital output to support DVI, DFP and VESA P&D via external TMDS
  • Supports up to 1600x1200 screen resolution for LCD panels
TV-OUT SUPPORT
  • Integrated TV encoder with composite, S-Video, and RGB interfaces
  • Supports PAL/NTSC TV formats
  • 10-bit DAC with 8-tap filter and ATI-exclusive enhancements
  • Macrovision 7.02 copy protection standard
  • Supports up to 1024x768 32bpp mode
OPTIMIZED SOFTWARE SUPPORT
  • Microsoft DirectX 8.1 and OpenGL® drivers
  • Unified driver support for all RADEON discrete and integrated graphics products
  • Support for Microsoft Windows® XP, Windows® 2000, and Windows® Me

A Closer Look at ATI 9100 IGP PRO ATI 9100 IGP PRO Reference Board: Basic Features
Comments Locked

24 Comments

View All Comments

  • Cygni - Monday, May 3, 2004 - link

    "Who that comes to this site give a flying f*ck about integrated graphics"

    "where are the x800 bencharks?? that's what we care about."

    "Stop with these goddamn AT sponsor suckup/teaser "ref board" reviews."

    First, where the heck did all of these MUTANTS come from? This is AT. Not eXtremeTechOmgFPSAWesome.org.

    Second, x800 is under NDA until its launched, for the love of god. Anandtech CANT say anything about it.

    Third, LOTS of Anandtech users care about Integrated Graphics. ALOT of the people who come to Anandtech system build for money/pleasure. Just go to the Forums and find out. This is an IT Tech site, NOT a "Gamers Only" site. Hence the server storys, etc.

    Finally, I for one enjoy the fact that Anandtech tests boards that most other sites dont have BEFORE they are on the shelf. Anandtech ALSO tests AFTER they are on the shelf to compare. Why WOULDNT they test the board they get sent, to let everyone know? And I like the way you imply that AnandTech only gets pre-release boards because they are sponsored by the company and want a favorable review. You certainly havent been coming here long if you think that.
  • Myrandex - Monday, May 3, 2004 - link

    also, what is up with the constant testing of bank interleave set to disabled, doesn't it help memory performance?
  • Myrandex - Monday, May 3, 2004 - link

    allisolm good job on the empty post. But otherwise, in the article, it is stated that the chipset just supports SATA ports, but in the chipset diagram, it shows RAID 0 and 1 supported. Any clue as to which is right? Also, it is always good to see integrated graphics performance, especially for the reason that many moderately proced laptop haves integrated graphics (not my A64 rad 9600, but still), and it is good to see them approach playable levels.
    Jason
  • Pumpkinierre - Monday, May 3, 2004 - link

    Its hard ro understand how you can 'optimise' for a different x86 cpu (nf3 and nVidia Gpus optimisation is a different story) unless they are taking advantage of some of the extra 'secret' X86-64 registers on the Prescott.

  • Bozo Galora - Monday, May 3, 2004 - link


    Stop with these goddamn AT sponsor suckup/teaser "ref board" reviews.
    If it aint final - dont look at it.
    All this crap is obsolete now anyway in just a few months.
    Give me a break.
    Talk about a white elephant.
  • AtaStrumf - Monday, May 3, 2004 - link

    It was your imagination! It's supposed to come out tomorrow May 4th or on Wednesday May 5th.

    As for IGP tests: Why the hell not test them? If you dont like it just skip it bitch! I know I was quite interested in the results and I'm sure so were many others.

    Nice to see ATi finaly come out with a good chipset (cross your fingers for OC-ing being as good as they say), so that the two GPU giants have now fairly devided the two top CPU manufacturers.
  • araczynski - Monday, May 3, 2004 - link

    All i'm saying is it must be a slow day in the news department :)

    i understand the interest, which i have as well, but in all honesty, anyone concerned about playing games, won't get a system with an IG, and anyone that does, will be disappointed no matter what IG is in there. Whether they get 19FPS or 21FPS, they're not going to be happy.

    anyway, where's the x800 stuff? wasn't that supposed to come out first of may? or was that my imagination again.
  • DAPUNISHER - Monday, May 3, 2004 - link

    There's a typo on the IGP test config page, it states ATi 865G where it should read Intel.

    BTW, I'm always very interested in IGP reviews as white box builder a good 80% of my biz is budget IGP systems.

    IMHO though, IGP with a $150+ CPU does not equate budget and Celerons won't find a place in my builds unless intel decides to make them more competitive in the sub $100 market vs AMD.

    Now, the last thing to answer is wether ATi finally got the overclocking right ;)
  • allisolm - Monday, May 3, 2004 - link

  • NullSubroutine - Monday, May 3, 2004 - link

    Unlike all these other guys, I do care about Intergrated Graphics...not because I own one (I got A64), but because many people do. Most everyday people buy systems from OEMs like Dell, who sell alot of systems with IGs.

    Alot of first time users buy systems that are cheap, and sometimes suck. It is nice to see that if someone wants to build a cheap system they can still play any older DX7 games at reasonably high fps and newer DX8.1/9 games at playable 640x480.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now