Building the Transistors

As we briefly touched on when going over the display technologies, the basic operation of a LCD display is that voltage is applied to the liquid crystal, which either twists or rotates it, allowing polarized light from the backlight through to the different subpixels which provide the red, green, and blue colors. In case you hadn’t noticed yet from all this discussion on color, what most of us are taught in elementary school on what the primary colors are is – while not entirely incorrect – not applicable to displays. Red, green, and blue are the primary colors for emissive (additive) light to give the widest range of color combinations, which is why subpixels are that color. If you were looking at subtractive colors, such as printing on white paper, you'd use cyan, magenta, and yellow.

Thin-Film Transistor Construction - Source: Cepheiden

The basic function of an LCD is to twist an appropriate amount to provide varying levels of light through in order to combine red, green, and blue to make all of the colors you see on your display. To move the liquid crystal, voltage is required, and that voltage is provided through at least one transistor. Since transistors are semiconductors, manufacturers are somewhat limited in what they can use to build the matrix out of, and since you must shine a backlight through it, preferably the transistor will not block all of the backlighting.

Displays leverage a thin-film transistor, or TFT, to provide the matrix of transistors which control all of the subpixels. Traditionally, TFTs were generally made out of amorphous silicon (a-Si) which can be made much thinner than the more traditional crystalline silicon (c-Si) you’d find in an integrated circuit. This allows the backlight to shine through the TFT without being attenuated as drastically as it would be on a c-Si TFT.

While a-Si has served us well for a long, long time, as displays move up in pixel density, the amount of light blocked by the TFT gets to be a higher percentage, since you need more transistors in a given area to control the increased number of pixels. To combat this, manufacturers are developing new TFT materials which provide increased aperture for the backlight.

This is likely to be an ever-expanding list of materials, but materials which provide a higher aperture than a-Si are low-temperature polycrystalline silicon (LTPS) and indium gallium zinc oxide (IGZO). Sharp has been manufacturing IGZO displays for several years now, and LTPS is used in both laptops and smartphones.


An image of the crystaline structure of IGZO - Source: Sharp

Of course, the major reason for the push to these technologies is to improve power efficiency. When you’re powered by a battery, any increases to the efficiency of the display can be dramatic, since the display backlight is often the highest power draw component of a laptop at idle (and laptops like to be idle). As an example, a Surface Book 2 15 with the display set to 100% brightness draws 7.65 W of power at idle. Of that, the display constitutes an amazing 6.22 W, or 81.3% of the power draw. By allowing more light through – via creating a thinner TFT – the net result is a reduction in power required for a backlight, improving its overall efficiency and generally providing a major benefit to a laptop's battery life.

There’s a lot of confusion here, and a common question you may see is if an IGZO or an IPS display is better, but IGZO is the TFT material, and IPS is the LCD type.

Lighting the Display

As far as backlighting goes, all modern laptop LCDs require a backlight. Laptops in turn generally rely on white LED backlighting, where the LEDs are located at the edges of the display, and the lighting from those LEDs is shone through a diffuser plate behind the display to provide a uniform backlight. This is most commonly referred to as an edge-lit display.

On larger displays where power draw isn’t as much of a concern, such as televisions, some manufacturers have moved to a full-array backlight, which puts the LEDs directly behind the display. This allows the individual LEDs to be dimmed to provide local dimming, which improves black levels quite dramatically, however it’s unlikely laptops will adopt this due to the extra thickness and power required. On high-end computer monitors, you may find a backlight made up of RGB lighting as well, but for the same reasons, laptops are unlikely to leverage this design.

The only display that doesn’t require a backlight is Organic Light Emitting Diode, or OLED, since the individual OLED subpixels emit their own light.

Backlighting brightness is typically controlled by using pulse-width modulation (PWM). A voltage is applied through a transistor that turns on and off quickly, and depending on how much time is spent in the on versus off position, various average voltage levels are achieved. This is called the duty cycle. A 50% duty cycle will have the voltage on for 50% of the time, and off for 50% of the time, and the average voltage will be half of the maximum.

The downside to PWM is that some people can be susceptible to the flickering that can occur, especially if the PWM frequency is too low. If a manufacturer is trying to save costs, they may utilize a cheaper PWM controller which operates at a frequency that is far too low. This can be more noticeable when the display is dimmed, since the amount of time the backlight is on in the duty cycle is much less. Laptops with a PWM frequency in the low hundreds of Hz can have a noticeable flicker, but quality controllers should operate at frequencies around 10 KHz or so, as to not make it noticeable to the human eye.

Panel Technology Color Space
Comments Locked

49 Comments

View All Comments

  • boeush - Wednesday, July 11, 2018 - link

    "High resolution used to be a liability in terms of battery life..."

    I'd imagine it still is - even if not as much due to the display backlight having to work harder, but still due to the sheer physical requirement to process, render, transmit, and update many more pixels per frame?
  • Kim151 - Wednesday, July 11, 2018 - link

    Start your home business right now. Spend more time with your family and earn. Start bringing 100$ per hr just on a computer. Very easy way to make your life happy and earning continuously. Start here…....... >>>
  • doggface - Wednesday, July 11, 2018 - link

    I wish, oh I wish that 1366x768 displays would die. Just die already.
  • MrSpadge - Wednesday, July 11, 2018 - link

    I think they're OK - on budget 4" devices.
  • mkozakewich - Wednesday, July 11, 2018 - link

    I've been using a High-Contrast theme with customized colours (because the default ones are just everywhere) to get a real and proper dark mode, and I'd *love* to try it on an OLED system. I can really notice my backlight, even at the lowest power usage and with the Intel Power-Saving thing active.
  • Evil Underlord - Wednesday, July 11, 2018 - link

    Glad to see more hope of a return to a saner 3:2 ratio. Not all of us spend all our times watching movies or on spreadsheets.

    Speaking of which, I'd love to see a similar article on keyboards. (In my view, the #1 important feature).
  • boeush - Wednesday, July 11, 2018 - link

    Regarding spreadsheets: by all means, keep all those horizontal pixels of a 'wide-screen' display - just give me some additional vertical pixels while you're at it! (Sometimes, working with spreadsheet-style documents can become a real PITA when the rows get too tall to fit on the screen...)
  • linuxgeex - Wednesday, July 11, 2018 - link

    "Because pixel density is inversely proportional to how well a panel blocks its backlight – denser panels will block more light – increasing the pixel density of a display requires ramping up the strength of the backlighting system as well. And while that’s not an issue for desktop monitors because of their constant power source, for laptops it can have a significant impact on battery life."

    "pixel density is inversely proportional to how well a panel blocks its backlight" - means that a higher pixel density display will struggle to achieve good contrast - in your words.

    "increasing the pixel density of a display requires ramping up the strength of the backlighting system as well" - you are saying that as a result of the LCD blocking less of the light due to the higher pixel density struggling to block the light from passing through it. So... explain why you need more light from the backlight when the LCD blocks less of it. Sounds to me like you don't understand the technology, or that you don't understand yourself...?

    The much more obvious cost to increased pixel density that you are not addressing is the cost of driving the extra pixels. The RAM that backs that display. The increased bus throughput. The increased frequency of the driving components. The increased work of the OS and applications to generate the extra pixel content. That's what kills the battery. That's why a WQHD laptop will get 2/3rds the idle operating time that an otherwise identical FHD model will, and why everyone who cares about all-day battery performance should stay away from the *QHD / 4K display models for the next couple years until those costs become a smaller portion of the idle power budget.
  • Brett Howse - Wednesday, July 11, 2018 - link

    It's the TFT that's blocking the backlight and a denser TFT requires a stronger backlight to get the same brightness from the display.

    Driving the extra pixels with the GPU and other components is a tiny difference. That's a common misconception you've stumbled upon.
  • linuxgeex - Thursday, July 12, 2018 - link

    The author's comments conflict with each other is what I am pointing out. He needs to research it and come up with a consistent statement. Preferrably one that correlates well with facts.

    The denser the display, the more transistors are blocking the passage of light, the brighter the backlight needs to be. That is what the author should have said instead of coming up with a much more wordy description that he himself obviously didn't even understand.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now