In this interesting world where processors are released but not formally announced, it means that when diving through the lists of supported CPUs on certain motherboards, we might find processors we have never heard of before. Thanks to some sleuthing on Twitter by one of our followers, we can detail that AMD has two new 35W Ryzen processors that we previously did not know about.

Over on the ASUS Crosshair VII Hero CPU supported list, the two new processors are listed, supported as of BIOS 0509:

Traditionally AMD uses the Athlon name for its combined CPU/GPU processors that have the GPU disabled (which AMD calls its NPUs, or non-accelerated processing units). What makes this interesting is that based on Geekbench data already submitted to the results database (on an ASUS B350M motherboard), these parts both have integrated graphics.

Between the two sources, it shows that the processors are essentially identical, with the difference in the Pro variant being that it falls under AMD’s commercial brand for customer support. The part then is a dual core processor with hyperthreading, running at a base frequency of 3.2 GHz, at a 35W TDP, and either 2 MB or 4 MB of L3 cache (both sources state something different: ASUS lists 4 MB, which is usually more accurate). Neither source states a turbo frequency, so it might come to pass that the Athlon processors do not have any turbo, but also missing is the information about the integrated graphics. Neither ASUS’ support list nor Geekbench traditionally lists this data. Geekbench does list it as a Raven Ridge part (which makes sense, being a CPU+GPU design), which would also mean it is built on 14nm.

Ryzen APUs
AnandTech Cores Base Turbo GPU TDP
Mobile
Ryzen 7 2700U   4C / 8T 2.5 GHz 3.4 GHz Vega 10 15 W
Ryzen 7 2700U Pro 4C / 8T 2.2 GHz 3.8 GHz Vega 10 15 W
Ryzen 5 2500U   4C / 8T 2.0 GHz 3.6 GHz Vega 8 15 W
Ryzen 5 2500U Pro 4C / 8T 2.0 GHz 3.6 GHz Vega 8 15 W
Ryzen 3 2300U   4C / 4T 2.5 GHz 3.4 GHz Vega 3 15 W
Ryzen 3 2300U Pro 4C / 4T 2.5 GHz 3.4 GHz Vega 6 15 W
Desktop
Ryzen 5 2400G   4C / 8T 3.6 GHz 3.9 GHz Vega 11 65 W
Ryzen 5 2400G Pro 4C / 8T 3.6 GHz 3.9 GHz Vega 11 65 W
Ryzen 5 2400GE   4C / 8T 3.2 GHz 3.8 GHz Vega 11 35 W
Ryzen 5 2400GE Pro 4C / 8T 3.2 GHz 3.8 GHz Vega 11 35 W
Ryzen 3 2200G   4C / 4T 3.5 GHz 3.7 GHz Vega 8 65 W
Ryzen 3 2200G Pro 4C / 4T 3.5 GHz 3.7 GHz Vega 8 65 W
Ryzen 3 2200GE   4C / 4T 3.2 GHz 3.6 GHz Vega 8 35 W
Ryzen 3 2200GE Pro 4C / 4T 3.2 GHz 3.6 GHz Vega 8 35 W
Athlon 200GE
YD200GC6M2OFB
  2C / 4T 3.2 GHz ? ? 35 W
Athlon Pro 200GE
YD200GC6M20FB
Pro 2C / 4T 3.2 GHz ? ? 35 W

Normally when processors are not announced with the rest of the set, it means one of two things. First, they are not important for the story, and so from a PR perspective it makes sense to the company to leave them out of materials (no matter how much that bothers the media), or that these processors are ‘off-roadmap’, and are built to order from a specific customer. At this point we are unsure of where AMD stands on these parts.

It is worth noting that these parts do not have the ‘Ryzen’ name in them.

Given the fact that it is a long weekend in the US, while we have reached out to our contacts at AMD, we are not expecting a response until Tuesday. More information as we get it.

Update: Computerbase.de reports that these two new processors are set to be announced at Computex, and that both of these parts have Vega 3 graphics.

Related Reading

POST A COMMENT

27 Comments

View All Comments

  • Nintendo Maniac 64 - Saturday, May 26, 2018 - link

    Yet those 2c/4t Pentiums sure seem quite popular in budget builds, and this seems to be AMD's answer to that. Reply
  • Nintendo Maniac 64 - Saturday, May 26, 2018 - link

    Derp, this was supposed to be a reply to the comment made by "rocky12345", but it seems that having javascript disabled breaks the "reply-to" function on Anandtech and just makes the resulting comment a new stand-alone comment. Reply
  • bji - Saturday, May 26, 2018 - link

    Why the eff Anandtech doesn't just switch to Disqus like every other discussion site with any competency is beyond me. Reply
  • npz - Saturday, May 26, 2018 - link

    No, Disqus is horrible. I'd rather have Anandtech create a new thread in the forums for article discussions Reply
  • NICOXIS - Sunday, May 27, 2018 - link

    I really don't understand how a website that is focused on the "latest" in technology can have a commenting system that remind of the '90s. Something like Ars would be nice. Reply
  • dromoxen - Sunday, May 27, 2018 - link

    Nope this system is fine
    in-tv cpus maybe? as Tv's become media centres ...
    Reply
  • leexgx - Wednesday, May 30, 2018 - link

    P site you disabled copying text so lost what I typed on mobile Reply
  • Tams80 - Sunday, May 27, 2018 - link

    Disqus is a laggy mess, that insists on trying to tie in your social media accounts (not something that bothers me, but I can see others being annoyed).

    The Verge too, have their own commenting system. It's also very basic.

    Anyway, the comments here are very limited, but at least they load fast and are separate from anything else.
    Reply
  • bji - Tuesday, May 29, 2018 - link

    Well I don't use social media accounts so I guess I was unaware of that shortcoming.

    Laggy mess? It is very slightly laggy I guess, but not so much that it's ever been an issue on any Disqus site I've ever used.
    Reply
  • GreenReaper - Friday, June 22, 2018 - link

    It could be that the comment system is broken even with Javascript enabled. On my Drupal-based news site I hunted it down in the source, where they'd assigned the wrong variable; the end result was that if you had already made a reply it wouldn't use the new comment ID for your next reply. Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now