Another year, another TechDay from Arm. Over the last several years Arm’s event has come as clockwork in the May timeframe and has every time unveiled the newest flagship CPU and GPU IPs. This year is no exception as the event is back on the American side of the Atlantic in Austin Texas where Arm has one of its major design centres.

Two years ago during the unveiling of the Cortex A73 I had talked a bit more about Arm’s CPU design teams and how they’re spread across locations and product lines. The main design centres for Cortex-A series of CPUs are found in Austin, Texas; Cambridge, the United Kingdom, and Sophia-Antipolis in the south of France near Nice. For the last two years the Cortex A73 and Cortex A75 were designs that mainly came out of the Sophia team while the Cortex A53 and more recently the A55 were designs coming out of Cambridge. This means that we haven’t seen any recent designs coming out of Austin and the last of the “Austin family” of CPUs were the A57 and A72.

The project being worked on in Austin had been hyped up for several years – I remember even as early as the A73 release back in 2016 the company had pulled forward some elements from an advanced future microarchitecture on the back-end pipelines, especially on the FP/SIMD side. The Cortex A75 was further remarked as pulling more elements from this new mysterious project.

Today we can finally unveil what the Austin team has been working on – and it’s a big one. The new Cortex A76 is a brand new microarchitecture which has been built from scratch and lays the foundation for at least two more generations for what I’ll call “the second generation of Austin family” of CPUs.

The Cortex A76 is important for Arm for a design perspective as it represents a new start from a clean sheet. It’s rare for IP claim to be able to do this as it represents a great resource and time investment and if it weren’t for the Sophia design team taking over the steering wheel for the last two generations of products it wouldn’t have been reasonable to execute. The execution of the CPU design teams should be emphasised in particular as Arm claims this is the 5th generation “annual beat” product where the company delivers a new microarchitecture every new year. Think of it as an analogue to Intel’s past Tick-Tock strategy, but rather Tock-Tock-Tock for Arm with steady CAGR (compound annual growth rate) of 20-25% every generation coming from µarch improvements.

So what is the Cortex A76? In Arm’s words, it’s a “laptop-class” performance processor with mobile efficiency. The vision of the A76 as a laptop-class processor had been emphasised throughout the TechDay presentation so it seems Arm is really taking advantage of the large performance boost of the IP to cater to new market segments such as the emerging “Always connected PCs” which Qualcomm is spearheading with their SoC platforms.

The Cortex A76 microarchitecture has been designed with high performance while maintaining power efficiency in mind. Starting from a clean sheet allowed the designers to remove bottlenecks throughout the design and to break previous microarchitectural limitations. The focus here was again maximum performance while remaining within energy efficiency that is fit for smartphones.

In broad metrics, what we’re promised in actual products using the A76 is the follows: a 35% performance increase alongside 40% improved power efficiency. We’ll also see a 4x improvements in machine learning workloads thanks to new optimisations in the ASIMD pipelines and how dot products are handled. These figures are baselined on A75 configurations running at 2.8GHz on 10nm processes while the A76 is projected by Arm to come in at 3GHz on 7nm TSMC based products.

The new CPU is naturally still compatible with DynamIQ’s common cluster topology and Arm envisions designs to be paired with Cortex A55s as the little more power efficient CPUs. The configuration scalability of the DynamIQ IP again was reiterated and we were presented with example configurations such as 1+7 or 2+6 with either Cortex A75 or A76 CPU IP. This presentation slide was one of the rare ones where Arm referred to the area size of the A76, pointing out that the A75 still had better PPA and thus might still be a valid design choice for companies, depending on their needs. One comparison that was made during the event is that in terms of area, three A76’s with larger caches would fit inside the size of a Skylake core – all while within 10% of the IPC of the Intel CPU, but obviously there’s also process node scaling considerations to take into account.

A standout claim is that Arm aims to outperform the competition at half the area and half the power. Arm was slightly beating around the bush here in what it considers the competition, but generally the answer was that it was considering everybody the competition. Taking into account Intel, AMD or Samsung it’s actually not that hard to imagine Arm beating them in PPA as historically the company always had the smallest CPU designs and that directly translates into more efficient microarchitectures.

Before we get into more detailed breakdowns of the performance and power improvements and what I’m expecting to happen into products, let’s see the microarchitectural improvements on the core and how Arm managed to extract this much performance while maintaining power efficiency.

Cortex A76 µarch - Frontend
POST A COMMENT

122 Comments

View All Comments

  • darwiniandude - Friday, June 1, 2018 - link

    Lots of Apple hate in these comments. Which is fine, nothing wrong with having your own opinion. Performance is important to me - I edit 4K (not for business purposes) from a few Fuji mirrorless bodies quite happily on iOS - on an iPhone X and iPad Pro. My fastest desktop and notebook machines I own currently are both Core2Duo. They simply cannot do it. I’m not a typical use case. I did have a quad i7, but I sold that machine (MacBook Pro) while I could still get a stupidly high amount of money back for it used. Don’t assume that no one on mobile wants high performance ARM cores - not everyone is just using Facebook messenger taking the occasional selfie all day.
    Also, I remember when AMD smoked Intel at times in the past. People argued, but there was never the “you don’t need that performance” type arguments.
    Reply
  • leledumbo - Friday, June 1, 2018 - link

    That's what Apple is actually doing: single TDP configurable SoC for both their phones and pads (and tops if the rumor come true).

    The argument is not "you don't need that performance", but "most people don't need that performance". You are one of the few in the performance-needy pool. I know you exist, just not many, and that's what many manufacturers are aware of, so they don't take the Apple route.
    Reply
  • hlovatt - Friday, June 1, 2018 - link

    But this is Anantech. We want the best. We want to push the envelope. I don’t want to read about ho hum performance at a good price. That’s for Consumer Reports or a myriad of other yawn sites. Reply
  • serendip - Friday, June 1, 2018 - link

    4k editing on an iPad probably won't be using the CPU completely for processing though. There's a lot of stuff that can be passed on to faster and more efficient DSP and IP blocks. I've also run Quicksync encoding on Atom tablets running Windows, it's much faster than using the puny Atom cores directly. Reply
  • darwiniandude - Saturday, June 2, 2018 - link

    https://forums.luma-touch.com/viewtopic.php?t=6493 Some discussion of performance on iPad at 4K. It really does work very well. Must be using the GPU also. Reply
  • tipoo - Tuesday, September 4, 2018 - link

    Afaik, only playback will use dedicated blocks like Quicksync, editing itself, the rendering of new effects, would be heavily assisted by the GPU and partly on the CPU. Reply
  • techconc - Tuesday, June 5, 2018 - link

    The "most people don't need that performance" argument may sound nice to say, but why do you think people buy new phones? They do it when their old phone feels slow,etc. A higher performing phone has a longer effective life span.

    Using phones as an example, Android has about 85% of the market share for devices sold. Yet, when Apple and Google report their active user base, Android barely maintains a 2:1 ratio over iOS devices. Why? The majority of Android devices sold are low end devices that have a much shorter effective life span.
    Reply
  • Meteor2 - Monday, July 2, 2018 - link

    I kinda want to buy a new phone, but my Nexus 5X simply doesn't feel slow. So I haven't. And it must have less than half the performance of modern high-end phones. Reply
  • Maxiking - Sunday, June 3, 2018 - link

    So another paper dragon, YAY.

    They promise the same every year, so statistically, if they keep repeating the lie every year, they will get there eventually!
    Reply
  • Herkko - Wednesday, June 6, 2018 - link

    Tell me how much Nintendo Switch power and energy effiency grow if chance old ARM-cortex A57-A53 new ARM-cortex A76 CPU Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now