Ryzen Overclocking

As it currently stands, all of the Ryzen and Ryzen 2 desktop processors on the market all feature unlocked multipliers which puts the burden of overclockability onto the motherboard vendors to ensure that users have the right tools for the job. The X470 Taichi Ultimate has a colossal power delivery and users looking to push their unlocked Ryzen processor beyond the rated specifications shouldn’t have too much problem here; not just for the overkill phase count, but the quality of the power delivery itself. The BIOS is somewhat easy to navigate and all of the overclocking options can be found within the OC Tweaker subsection.

The Taichi Ultimate does not have any auto overclocking features outside of the ability to load XMP profiles on the memory, so all and any CPU frequency and APU/PCIE frequency if a user wishes to use an APU such as the Ryzen 5 2400G has to be done manually. To do so, setting the overclock mode setting from auto to manual allows users to customize and tweak options including CPU Frequency and CPU voltage; two vital settings for overclocking CPU core frequency.

While the best Ryzen 7 1000-series silicon can achieve clock speeds of up to 4.2/4.3 GHz with ambient cooling, our AM4 motherboard test bench Ryzen 7 1700 sample has only run up to 4.0 GHz stable with voltages ranging from 1.36-1.4 volts.

Methodology

Our standard overclocking methodology is as follows. We select the automatic overclock options and test for stability with POV-Ray and OCCT to simulate high-end workloads. These stability tests aim to catch any immediate causes for memory or CPU errors.

For manual overclocks, based on the information gathered from previous testing, starts off at a nominal voltage and CPU multiplier, and the multiplier is increased until the stability tests are failed. The CPU voltage is increased gradually until the stability tests are passed, and the process repeated until the motherboard reduces the multiplier automatically (due to safety protocol) or the CPU temperature reaches a stupidly high level (100ºC+). Our test bed is not in a case, which should push overclocks higher with fresher (cooler) air.

Overclocking Results

Our Ryzen 7 1700 CPU does have a limitation between 3.9 GHz and 4.0 GHz; at least on the boards, we have tested thus far. This is down to silicon lottery and a combination of a sharp ramp of voltage to temperature when moving up each different step; therefore, cutting out/throttling due to thermal limitations when pushed too far on ambient cooling.

At the time of testing, the motherboard had a tendency to undervolt the processor with a full load applied, although not by an excessive amount and not one which would cause instability issues in testing other than at 3.9 GHz when the undervolting proved insufficient for the load applied. Interestingly enough, our sample even managed to boot up at 4.1 GHz with a set voltage of 1.437 V, although this was very unstable when any load was applied. Our maximum stable overclock achieved was 4.0 GHz at 1.4 V, although the motherboard did settle at 1.376 V under load, even though the overclock did fail in Pov-Ray with a similar set voltage at 3.9 GHz as previously noted. A notable and consistent increase in Pov-Ray performance was apparent as each frequency strap was increased.

Gaming Performance ASRock X470 Taichi Ultimate Conclusion
Comments Locked

41 Comments

View All Comments

  • AdrianB1 - Friday, August 3, 2018 - link

    The implementation can be very different, if only 1 or 2 PCIe 2.0 lanes are linked to the chip the performance is not a known quantity. We know the max speed of the chipset, we don't know how it was implemented on this expensive motherboard.Would you bet your money on a good implementation?
  • Amoro - Thursday, August 2, 2018 - link

    Why is there such a noticeable performance delta? Is that B350 Tomahawk doing some weird overclocking?
  • 4everalone - Thursday, August 2, 2018 - link

    That's a whole lot of work you guys did and I don't mean to discount it in anyway. But it makes me wonder, isn't the point of going for x470 instead of the x370 to take better advantage of what the new processors have to offer? So why go through this full blown review using an older processor? Was the 2700x unavailable at the time you started with this?
  • 29a - Thursday, August 2, 2018 - link

    They used an odd assortment of games too.
  • DanNeely - Thursday, August 2, 2018 - link

    games need to be fully scriptable via commandline for automated data collection, which eliminates a number of otherwise popular games. The gamelist itself is updated about once/year (looks like still v2017), but needs to keep a decent fraction of last years list to allow some comparison between new and old reviews.
  • Ratman6161 - Thursday, August 2, 2018 - link

    I suspect the reason is that if they used a 2xxx CPU to test the x470 and B450 boards then they would have to re-test all the x370 and B350 boards in order to make all the tests comparable.
  • pixelstuff - Thursday, August 2, 2018 - link

    I'm glad to see another motherboard with a 10G NIC, but I'd really like to the new 2.5G protocol start showing up on everything. Surely that can work in situations where the 10G would be to hot.
  • JlHADJOE - Thursday, August 2, 2018 - link

    Dude, you can't just put "Aquantia 10GbE on Ryzen" in the headline and do zero network testing. This review is a total bait and switch!
  • Flappergast - Thursday, August 2, 2018 - link

    Please explain why this new top Board is doing 47.8 FPS while the old budget board msi b350 is doing 52.5 FPS in Ashes?
  • WasHopingForAnHonestReview - Friday, August 3, 2018 - link

    This concerns me. That alone is keeping me from buying one.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now