Display Analysis

One area where Microsoft has consistently outperformed the competition is in the display department. They continue to be the only major PC maker to hardware calibrate their displays at the factory, across the entire product lineup. It wasn’t always the case, but starting with the Surface 3, all Surface devices are now calibrated, and the Surface Book 2 is of course no exception.

The benefit of a hardware calibration over something you could do on your own is that you avoid issues with clipping the display to correct issues, and of course the other benefit is the display is the right color without any work involved by the end user.

For the Surface Book 2, the 13.5-inch model keeps the same 3000x2000 3:2 aspect ratio display as the original, and that’s not a bad thing, since it was arguably the best display we’ve tested in a notebook to date. For the larger 15-inch model, the aspect ratio stays the same, but you get a few more pixels at 3240x2160. The overall density is slightly less than the smaller Book, but the difference is small. The 13.5-inch model is 267 PPI, and the 15-inch model is 258 PPI.

Microsoft also has started to add some rudimentary color management tools for the end user, with selectable color profiles in the action center. They started this trend with the Surface Studio, which is the only Surface model to date which supports the wider color gamut of DCI-P3 and P3-D65, but it also has a profile for sRGB, which is what most of the web and applications use. While it would be nice to see P3-D65 gamut support on the other Surface devices as well, there are power implications of wider gamut LEDs, and the lack of a true color management system in Windows means it’s generally best to leave the system in sRGB mode anyway.

With both the new Surface Pro, and the Surface Book, to offer some of the P3-D65 benefits but with the constraints of a sRGB panel, Microsoft provides an Enhanced mode which offer mid-tones closer to P3-D65 without affecting skin tones. That gives you a bit more pop in the colors without blowing out skin tones, and is the default color mode on the Surface Book 2. It’s not the same as a true P3-D65 display by any means, but for people who feel sRGB is a bit too dull for them, it’s a way to keep those users happy as well.

To look at the Surface Book 2’s display characteristics, we utilize SpectraCal’s CalMAN suite, along with an X-Rite i1DisplayPro colorimeter for contrast and brightness readings, and the X-Rite i1Pro2 spectrophotometer for color accuracy.

Brightness and Contrast

Display - Max Brightness

Display - Black Levels

Display - Contrast Ratio

The larger Surface Book 2 gets plenty bright, and about 450 nits, which will help if using in a bright environment or outside. But despite these very bright whites, the black levels are still very solid, leading to excellent contrast. This was one of the best things about the original Surface Book, and the black levels really help out in video content.

For those that want to use the Surface Book 2 in a dim room, the display goes all the way down to 4 nits, so there is plenty of brightness range to find a level suitable for anyone.

Grayscale

Display - Grayscale Accuracy

Thanks to the factory calibration, the Surface Book 2 offers exceptional grayscale results. The overall dE2000 is by far the best we’ve ever tested. The gamma levels stay pretty close to the 2.2 level, as they should. Unlike some devices where great grayscale on the black levels helps drive the average down for poor grayscale at 100% white, the Surface Book 2 is almost perfect across the entire range, with no level exceeding a dE2000 of 2.0. The white point is perfect as well.

Gamut

Display - Gamut Accuracy

The gamut results mirror the grayscale, in that they are almost perfect for both the primary and secondary colors. Only 100% blue is slightly off, which drags cyan off a bit as well, but the error levels are so small it would be difficult to detect them with the human eye.

Saturation

Display - Saturation Accuracy

Rather than just test the 20% levels, we now do a full 4-bit step for saturation. The Surface Book 2 has an overall dE2000 level under 1 for this test, which is exceptional.

Gretag Macbeth

Display - GMB Accuracy

The Gretag Macbeth test covers far more colors, and is the most comprehensive test. It includes the important skin tones as well. The overall result for the Surface Book 2 is once again, fantastic. A few colors drift slightly, but very few even creep over the 2.0 error level.

In addition, we run a colorchecker test to provide a relative comparison of the correct color that should be displayed on the bottom, along with the color that is actually displayed on top. The result is relative though due to error levels in your own display, but you can see that the Surface Book 2 has white and color levels that are nearly perfect.

Enhanced Mode

Turning on Enhanced Mode changes the gamma and uses hardware to shift the colors for some colors, without affecting the skin tones.

You can see the gamma is off quite a bit compared to the 2.2 level it should hit, compared to the nearly perfect gamma in sRGB mode. The overall grayscale levels are still far better than practically any other notebook though.

The Gretag Macbeth shows off the effect on colors. The dE2000 level is much higher on certain colors, but the skin tones remain unchanged. But even so, with a GMB result under 2.0, even in enhanced mode the color accuracy is far better than almost any other notebook.

Display Conclusion

Microsoft continues to be the only major PC maker to color calibrate all of their devices, and the Surface Book 2 sets new levels for accuracy in a notebook. The display also has amazing contrast. It’s not difficult to add these together and say that the Surface Book 2 has the best display on any laptop.

GPU Performance Battery Life and Charge Time
Comments Locked

120 Comments

View All Comments

  • eddman - Thursday, December 21, 2017 - link

    The term you are looking for is "fan".

    "Fanboy" basically means "a fan of something that completely lacks logic and reason and becomes aggressive while defending it".

    P.S. IMO even the word "fan" is undesirable. It's the short for "fanatic".
  • tyaty1 - Thursday, December 21, 2017 - link

    In modern language , fan and fanatic are became distinct words.
  • HStewart - Thursday, December 21, 2017 - link

    In my opinion "fanboy" is typically a term that is on tech website often in an attempt to discredit someone who has different - this I found mostly used by people that like AMD products and hate Intel. Most Intel people pretty much ignore technical sites - except if they are gamers.

    I am not an Intel "Fanboy" but I do support Intel - and why is simple, I have a long history of using there products and for graphics had a bad history with Ati GPU's - which is now part of AMD. i also believe that when a company creates a product you should buy from one's that created it.

    But things to change - I used to pro-Microsoft almost Fanboy and refused used Android, but I have great success with Samsung Tab S series ( both an S and now S3 ) and I also have Surface like Samsung TabPro S series.

    I serious doubt in my lifetime I will support AMD - it really kind of technical thing - I was highly into CPU internals at my first job and my experience with AMD and ATI maybe me not trust them. But I would state - that a lot of this influence by AMD Fanboys ( not supporter ) on the Internet who seem to attack Intel users every where they go.
  • HStewart - Thursday, December 21, 2017 - link

    One note like everything else on Internet, this is my opinion. For example you could Intel for AMD and ATI/AMD for NVidia and all except the line about who created - have a totally different point of view
  • Reflex - Thursday, December 21, 2017 - link

    Odd that your issue with AMD would be due to technical experience. I worked on the Windows kernel for a number of years and during that time AMD developed both the Athlon and Athlon64/Opteron line. It was the technical perspective that brought me and so many other engineers towards AMD, they understood good architecture while Intel understood good marketing. Dave Cutler famously embraced AMD64 when it became clear to him what a mess IA64 was.

    That isn't to besmirch Intel as an engineering company. They got religion when Netburst hit its wall at only 40% of its design specification. But for Intel the limiting factor has long been marketing and management, for AMD it has always been resources. The latter reasons I respect a lot more than the former.

    I've used both extensively. Currently I have a pure Intel setup across my devices (well, ARM in my phone). But I'd happily build a Ryzen based system and having read many of the technical docs around it, its a fantastic engineering achievement.
  • Reflex - Thursday, December 21, 2017 - link

    I've pointed this out repeatedly, but TB support is a non-starter for a corporate focused laptop. It is considered a security risk as it is a direct line to the PCIe bus and can be used to easily bypass Bitlocker and other security measures. Devices with TB on them are almost never permitted for government or sensitive corporate sales.

    There also really isn't much demand, while I'd like to see more USB-C if only for future compatibility, to date only my phone actually uses it (and most connectors use standard USB on the other end) and eGPU or external storage simply aren't rational for a system based on a 15W CPU. The available 1060 already is bottlenecked by that CPU so I'm not certain what an eGPU would gain you (or really fast storage vs just having it on the network).

    I feel like a lot of the 'must haves' you read in these comments are theoretical rather than practical. People want to believe they have certain capabilities and expect the hardware to support the scenario yet in the real world it would almost never be used and arguably be non-sensical if they did.
  • damianrobertjones - Friday, December 22, 2017 - link

    Shhhhh! Stop it... you're making sense!
  • Icehawk - Friday, December 22, 2017 - link

    TB3 is like firewire, nobody uses it except for a few use cases. I’d much prefer a dp/mini dp port for ease of connecting to monitors. Mind you I am coming from a corporate pov here.
  • jabber - Saturday, December 23, 2017 - link

    Yeah I'm looking around at all the Thunderbolt devices...I don't and probably never will have.
  • KPOM - Friday, December 29, 2017 - link

    Even if they are concerned about TB3, they should at least have a USB-C 3.1 Gen 2 port.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now