Meet Radeon Overlay

As one of the main features of Adrenalin, Radeon Overlay is a little difficult to sum up neatly. It’s essentially an in-game/desktop overlay of certain Radeon Settings options and tools, combined with OSD and performance logging/monitoring functionality. While an overlay, AMD noted that the overhead was very small and that Radeon Overlay would not interfere with Steam in-game overlay and others. Radeon Overlay hooks into particular hardware in GPUs, and while AMD mentioned that it supports a wide range of products, a full compatibility list was not disclosed.

By default, Radeon Overlay is enabled by ALT+R. While Radeon Overlay works in windowed, borderless fullscreen, and exclusive fullscreen mode, performance monitoring only works in fullscreen for DX9, 11, 12, and Vulkan applications. The monitoring and logging is confined to Radeon Overlay and separate from the WattMan monitoring, which has no logging capability.

The performance monitor OSD can be anchored to different parts of the screen.

The list of performance monitoring metrics is as follows: FPS, GPU Utilization, GPU Engine Clock, GPU Memory Clock, GPU Temperature, GPU Power, GPU Fan Speed, CPU Utilization, System RAM Utilization.

Unsurprisingly, ReLive is a large aspect of Radeon Overlay, which replaces the older ReLive toolbar. OSD metrics can be hidden from ReLive capture as needed. With the record/stream region, a specific window or application can be captured while in windowed or borderless fullscreen mode.

AMD mentioned that enabling FRTC or Chill (both exclusive fullscreen only) will require a restart, but adjusting them once enabled will not. Provided that it is already enabled on the monitor, FreeSync can be enabled in-game. Like the rest of the options, Color Settings will apply instantly, and can be applied per display for multi-monitor configurations.

For Sharing Your Streams: Radeon Settings ‘Connect Tab’ Radeon On Your Smartphone: AMD Link


View All Comments

  • MamiyaOtaru - Tuesday, December 12, 2017 - link

    "People like you care about Watts like you live in a 3rd world country."

    haha wut. I care about watts because more of them is harder to cool. Fewer of them means a quieter machine.
  • StevoLincolnite - Wednesday, December 13, 2017 - link

    I care about watts... Because although I live in a 1st world country... My electricity prices are trending towards 50' cents per KWH.

    With that... AMD ain't all bad as far as power consumption goes, VEGA for instance if you underclock and undervolt her, she can sip on the power... Still. I'll wait to upgrade from my Polaris card and hope Navi brings the goods next year.
  • Duckeenie - Tuesday, December 12, 2017 - link

    "People like you care about Watts like you live in a 3rd world country."

    Donald Trump is broadening his horizons it seems, no longer is he content with trolling twitter.
  • Hurr Durr - Wednesday, December 13, 2017 - link

    If you`re triggered by what Trump says, you deserve it all. Reply
  • mapesdhs - Thursday, December 14, 2017 - link

    MAGA! 8) Reply
  • sonny73n - Wednesday, December 13, 2017 - link

    Only idiots would not care about Watts. Less Watts -> less heat -> less than noise -> better cooling -> better overclocking.
    Only idiots would not want greater efficiency.
  • BigCapitalist - Tuesday, December 12, 2017 - link

    Also, Nvidia offers a rendering software for like $300 a year called Nvidia IRAY.

    AND offer ProRenderer for FREE, and guess what? It works with Nvidia GPUs unlike Nvidia not working with AMD GPUs.

    That's the kind of future we get with Nvidia, all they care about is money. A real business with a good business model cares about the consumer as well.
  • mapesdhs - Thursday, December 14, 2017 - link

    The consumer is free not to buy their products. Your name is ironic. Capitalism is simply don't steal and keep your word, the basic essence of free trade. "care" is an emotional concept, that's the sort of thing inferred by the customer, not implied by the seller. If NV is making pots, good, means they've found a market. Rule one of invention: identify a need. Reply
  • JasonMZW20 - Tuesday, December 12, 2017 - link

    "As for Vega, it's terrible in perf per W, perf per mm2 and much worse in perf per cost(note that cost and price are 2 different things). Vega 64 and 56 are a disaster for gaming and you are the one that lacks a clue, or objectivity."

    This just shows that you have never used one. I have 2 and they're both running within 200W* undervolted (Superposition can push this up to 250W due to the number of triangles it renders, but only if you raise the power limit). GTX 1080 is 180W, more if OC'd obviously.
    *165-212W in Wolfenstein 2 and Ashes of the Singularity, 4k60p. 1565MHz avg. @ 1.006-1.025v, 1100MHz HBM.

    If you want to brute force Vega, you obviously can with power limit increases and more voltage. I've found that that isn't worth it, unless you're going for outright performance or bragging rights in benches. Vega will easily pull over 300W (hit 306-326W in Superposition 4k optimized with auto voltages and +50% power limit), but it doesn't tend to gain a huge amount of performance. I'm more interested in its efficiency, and have been surprised by it. I'm not easily swayed by internet opinion though.
  • JasonMZW20 - Tuesday, December 12, 2017 - link

    2 Vega64s* Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now