On the day following what’s perhaps one of the greatest (and oddest) product design wins for AMD’s Radeon Technologies Group, a second bit of surprising news is coming out of AMD. Raja Koduri, the Senior VP and Chief Architect of the group, who has been its leader since the RTG was formed two years ago, has announced that he is resigning from the company, effective tomorrow.

Word of Raja’s resignation originally broke via an internal memo penned by Raja and acquired by Hexus. And while AMD will not confirm the validity of the memo, the company is confirming that Raja has decided to leave the company.

To my AMD family,

Forty is a significant number in history.  It is a number representing transition, testing and change. I have just spent forty days away from the office going through such a transition. It was an important time with my family, and it also offered me a rare space for reflection. During this time I have come to the extremely difficult conclusion that it is time for me to leave RTG and AMD.

I have no question in my mind that RTG, and AMD, are marching firmly in the right direction as high-performance computing becomes ever-more-important in every aspect of our lives.  I believe wholeheartedly in what we are doing with Vega, Navi and beyond, and I am incredibly proud of how far we have come and where we are going. The whole industry has stood up and taken notice of what we are doing. As I think about how computing will evolve, I feel more and more that I want to pursue my passion beyond hardware and explore driving broader solutions.

I want to thank Lisa and the AET for enabling me to pursue my passion during the last four years at AMD, and especially the last two years with RTG. Lisa has my utmost respect for exhibiting the courage to enable me with RTG, for believing in me and for going out of her way to support me.  I would also like to call out Mark Papermaster who brought me into AMD, for his huge passion for technology and for his relentless support through many difficult phases.  And of course, I want to thank each and every one of my direct staff and my indirect staff who have worked so hard with me to build what we have now got.  I am very proud of the strong leaders we have and I'm fully confident that they can execute on the compelling roadmap ahead.

I will continue to be an ardent fan and user of AMD technologies for both personal and professional use.

As I mentioned, leaving AMD and RTG has been an extremely difficult decision for me.  But I felt it is the right one for me personally at this point.  Time will tell.  I will be following with great interest the progress you will make over the next several years.

On a final note, I have asked a lot of you in the last two years.  You've always delivered.  You've made me successful both personally and professionally, for which I thank you all from the bottom of my heart.  I have these final requests from you as I leave:

. Stay focused on the roadmap!
. Deliver on your commitments!
. Continue the culture of Passion, Persistence and Play!
. Make AMD proud!
. Make me proud!

Yours,
Raja

Meanwhile, AMD has released a short statement confirming Raja’s resignation and thanking him for his service, while also stating that this is not going to impact RTG’s product roadmap or schedule.

Earlier today, we announced two unrelated updates for our Radeon Technologies Group: 1) Raja Koduri has decided to leave AMD and 2) we are taking the next steps in our work to strengthen RTG by further focusing the organization on key growth areas.

I wanted to also make sure you understood these updates do not impact our plans or the strategic direction we are driving our graphics business.   We appreciate the contributions Raja has made helping establish our dedicated graphics focus and  strong team that is capable of accomplishing the ambitious goals we have set for this part of our business.  Also want to make sure it is clear that there are no changes to our public product or technology graphics roadmaps, and we remain on track to deliver on our commitments in 2018 and beyond. Lisa will continue to lead RTG on an interim basis while we complete our search for a new leader.

We have made significant progress across AMD these past two years delivering the first wave of our high-performance products, best exemplified by our improved financial performance and year-over-year market share gains across all of our client, graphics and server products. Today’s changes are designed to allow us to better take advantage of the significant growth opportunities in front of us.

Raja’s resignation comes just under two months in to his three month sabbatical. At the time, Raja left to spend time with his family, and now will not be returning. This marks the second time Raja has left AMD, after having left as the company’s graphics CTO in 2009 to go work at Apple (and where his influence is still felt there today).

While AMD is reiterating that this won’t affect the RTG product roadmap, Raja’s resignation will none the less make waves at RTG and in the broader GPU community. Since the RTG reorganization Raja was for all intents and purposes the CEO of AMD’s graphics business, with the responsibilities and publicity that follow. Raja has overseen and led all aspects of AMD graphics hardware and software, and Raja’s public presence and involvement rendered him the face of graphics at AMD, in all senses of the word. So for the RTG, this marks the departure of the group’s first leader, and a visionary one at that.

And while neither AMD nor Raja’s statements comment on it for obvious reason, the elephant in the room is going to be whether Raja’s resignation is related to the launch of AMD’s Vega GPU architecture. While the Vega 10 has returned AMD to competitiveness in the high-end market, it has not been as strong of a competitor as AMD (or fans) would like to see, and some hardware features have still not been enabled. It would be unusual for someone to resign (or be forced out) after a less-than-smooth launch like Vega, but not unheard of. But for now, as no one will be discussing internal politics, anything on the matter would be speculation at best.

On a personal note, I wish Raja the best of luck on his future endeavors. While AMD is still fighting to escape their underdog status in the GPU world, it’s not for a lack of effort, and it’s been Raja spearheading that effort. Cementing AMD’s graphics operations under a single group – and a single leader – has done wonders for how the company communicates with press and users alike. As RTG’s leader he’s both shown a passion for the technology that clearly rubbed off on the rest of the group, and at the same time he has been honest about RTG’s faults. Anand once called Raja “the king”, and after 4 years I can see why.

As for AMD and RTG’s future, since the start of Raja’s sabbatical, Dr. Lisa Su has been running the RTG. AMD has confirmed that this arrangement will not be changing, and that Lisa will continue to run the RTG while the company searches for a new leader for the group. In the meantime, briefly touched upon in Raja’s memo and AMD’s official statement, in an unrelated matter the company is confirming that they are making further investments into gaming and server GPU compute. This isn’t a new direction for the company, as it’s been clear they’ve intended to take Vega in this direction from the start, but some additional investments have been made to this effect.

Source: Hexus & AMD

POST A COMMENT

54 Comments

View All Comments

  • Azix - Tuesday, November 07, 2017 - link

    vega aint that bad at efficiency. 200-250W at 1600Mhz on a vega 56 running 1080 perf is not horrible. but they can't afford to cherrypick so they pump the volts. Reply
  • jjj - Tuesday, November 07, 2017 - link

    It's more likely that they missed targets. If i recall correctly, leaked slides were showing the server SKUs at 25TFLOPS and 225W TDP.
    In any case, if you look at gaming vs the 1080, you got let's say 280W vs 180W and AMD saves a lot of power by using HBM so being so far behind is terrible.
    Die size is 55% larger than the GTX 1080 and from a cost perspective HBM makes it much worse.
    We'll see how Vega does in other products but its first showing is terrible from a competitive position point of view.
    Reply
  • JasonMZW20 - Tuesday, November 07, 2017 - link

    Vega64 hits an efficiency stride in Wolfenstein 2. I don’t OC my Vega64 much because I’m still on air, but I have slightly increased clocks while drastically lowering voltages 1557MHz/1.032v and 1652MHz/1.078v. Runs at about 1600MHz/1.050v.

    I’ve logged 182W-193W (total range is 174-206W) in Wolf 2 with all settings maxed and using 7.1GB of VRAM at 1080p. Clocks are 1600-1605MHz/1.050v.

    Conversely, Superposition 1080p Extreme pushes Vega to 243W with spikes of 252W at times at only 1575MHz/1.025-1.031v. A lot of fixed function geometry, I think; uses less than 4GB VRAM. Not sure if it’s culling overdrawn primitives either.

    Clearly Vega needs its new hardware features used (RPM, triangle culling/DSBR, deferred rendering/tiling, and an ability to convert fixed-function geometry datasets to NGG/Primitive Shaders on-the-fly - I wonder if that’s even possible), otherwise it’s an upclocked Fiji that drains power.
    Reply
  • Santoval - Wednesday, November 08, 2017 - link

    Are these new Vega hardware features *still* not exposed by the drivers, even after so many driver versions? I am unpleasantly dumbfounded.. Reply
  • mdriftmeyer - Wednesday, November 08, 2017 - link

    It's not a matter of them being exposed in the driver. They are exposed. It's a matter of engines implementing them. Reply
  • Samus - Wednesday, November 08, 2017 - link

    I think the RTG of AMD went into damage control mode when Maxwell launched. That was a real wakeup call and they have never really responded, technologically, instead depending on lower price points to compete in performance (with no real competitive product in the mid-range...until Fury and Vega, both of which couldn't compete at the high end.) The only real market for Radeon products is mining.

    That said, it's hard to ignore the design wins AMD has had with gaming consoles. They have effectively dominated this market segment since the Wii (which, unfortunately compared to the Gamecube, lacked an AMD logo.) The first mainstream console since the Wii to lack AMD graphics is the Switch, which has pretty underwhelming graphics, especially when not docked, and that's going to really hurt it as time goes on.
    Reply
  • vladx - Wednesday, November 08, 2017 - link

    "The first mainstream console since the Wii to lack AMD graphics is the Switch, which has pretty underwhelming graphics, especially when not docked, and that's going to really hurt it as time goes on."

    Not really, Nintendo hasn't banked on high-grade graphics on it's platform for a really long time. I'd say they given up for good on bringing mainstream games to its' platform.
    Reply
  • Cooe - Wednesday, November 08, 2017 - link

    Fiji (Fury, Fury X, Nano) competed with Maxwell 2 just fine. At stock clocks on both cards the Fury X was generally slightly faster at 4K, a wash at 1440p and slower at 1080p. This is still true today, though Fiji's not quite as far behind at the lower resolutions as it used to be. It just wasn't the HBM riding death-blow that AMD (and the fans) had been hoping for. Nvidia launching Big Maxwell 2 into the consumer space with the equally fast 980 Ti right before the Fiji launch really took the wind out of AMD's sails, but that still didn't make Fiji any less competitive with the best Nvidia had to offer. People (and AMD) had just been expecting it would be going up against the 980 at first, where it would have been an utter beat down until Nvidia could respond.

    Vega otoh, is an ENTIRELY different bag of chips. Without it's specific hardware features coded for in software, it could only match Nvidia's X80 series card that was using the regular consumer Pascal silicon already a year old (not weeks as in the 980 Ti vs Fury X case), let alone going toe to toe with Big Pascal (1080 Ti) as Fiji did with Maxwell 2.
    Reply
  • smilingcrow - Wednesday, November 08, 2017 - link

    "It wasn't all that bad really. It was just designed to hit a much lower target, pushing it to the limit is what made it terrible at power efficiency, which happens with literally every chip in existence."

    It hasn't happened with Nvidia for quite a while now so that's no excuse.
    If they only designed it to compete in the mainstream then fair enough and it shows their lack of ambition. But even at that level it's not power efficient.
    Reply
  • Stuka87 - Wednesday, November 08, 2017 - link

    If you downclock Vega to ~1200Mhz it is very efficient. However it is then slower than Pascal, so they upclocked it which moved it out of its efficiency range. Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now