Rise of the Tomb Raider

One of the newest games in the gaming benchmark suite is Rise of the Tomb Raider (RoTR), developed by Crystal Dynamics, and the sequel to the popular Tomb Raider which was loved for its automated benchmark mode. But don’t let that fool you: the benchmark mode in RoTR is very much different this time around.

Visually, the previous Tomb Raider pushed realism to the limits with features such as TressFX, and the new RoTR goes one stage further when it comes to graphics fidelity. This leads to an interesting set of requirements in hardware: some sections of the game are typically GPU limited, whereas others with a lot of long-range physics can be CPU limited, depending on how the driver can translate the DirectX 12 workload.

Where the old game had one benchmark scene, the new game has three different scenes with different requirements. These are three scenes designed to be taken from the game, but it has been noted that scenes like 2-Prophet shown in the benchmark can be the most CPU limited elements of that entire level, and the scene shown is only a small portion of that level. Because of this, we report the results for each scene on each graphics card separately.

Graphics options for RoTR are similar to other games in this type, offering some presets or allowing the user to configure texture quality, anisotropic filter levels, shadow quality, soft shadows, occlusion, depth of field, tessellation, reflections, foliage, bloom, and features like PureHair which updates on TressFX in the previous game.

Again, we test at 1920x1080 and 4K using our native 4K displays. At 1080p we run the High preset, while at 4K we use the Medium preset which still takes a sizable hit in frame rate.

It is worth noting that RoTR is a little different to our other benchmarks in that it keeps its graphics settings in the registry rather than a standard ini file, and unlike the previous TR game the benchmark cannot be called from the command-line. Nonetheless we scripted around these issues to automate the benchmark four times and parse the results. From the frame time data, we report the averages, 99th percentiles, and our time under analysis.

All of our benchmark results can also be found in our benchmark engine, Bench.

#1 Geothermal Valley Spine of the Mountain

MSI GTX 1080 Gaming 8G Performance


1080p

4K

 

#2 Prophet’s Tomb

MSI GTX 1080 Gaming 8G Performance


1080p

4K

 

#3 Spine of the Mountain GeoThermal Valley

MSI GTX 1080 Gaming 8G Performance


1080p

4K

The 8700K did not seem to play nicely with RoTR. We'll go back and check this.

CPU Gaming Performance: Shadow of Mordor CPU Gaming Performance: Grand Theft Auto
Comments Locked

222 Comments

View All Comments

  • mapesdhs - Friday, October 6, 2017 - link

    It depends on the commenter. :D Sites get accused of being everything week to week.
  • Dr. Swag - Friday, October 6, 2017 - link

    Fanboys gonna fanboy
  • Gastec - Saturday, October 14, 2017 - link

    You mean "orthodox"? :)
  • prisonerX - Thursday, October 5, 2017 - link

    The only time we're going to get a fair review of an Intel product is when they no longer dominate the market.

    It's just the reality of how things work.
  • Ranger1065 - Friday, October 6, 2017 - link

    +1
  • rtho782 - Friday, October 6, 2017 - link

    Eh, as 8700k is currently unobtainium, it doesn't really matter, as I'm sure the review will be finished by the time it's possible to buy!!
  • Zingam - Saturday, October 7, 2017 - link

    The only problem you don't have a coffee this morning and the coffee shops are closed. You are feeling the smell but it is only in your imagination.
  • watzupken - Thursday, October 5, 2017 - link

    Not sure why there is no R5 1600 in the test though. It will be good to see how the 6 cores solution compete.
  • Ian Cutress - Thursday, October 5, 2017 - link

    We chose a dozen processors we thought would be best for the review graphs.
    As mentioned on every results page, you can find the other data in our Benchmark database, Bench.

    https://www.anandtech.com/bench/product/2024?vs=20...
  • yeeeeman - Thursday, October 5, 2017 - link

    Well, you either have bad inspiration or you chose the CPUs from AMD that most people won't buy.
    You are missing R7 1700 and R5 1600 which are ~ same as new Intel offerings in computing tasks but they cost less. So...

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now