Shadow of Mordor

The next title in our testing is a battle of system performance with the open world action-adventure title, Middle Earth: Shadow of Mordor (SoM for short). Produced by Monolith and using the LithTech Jupiter EX engine and numerous detail add-ons, SoM goes for detail and complexity. The main story itself was written by the same writer as Red Dead Redemption, and it received Zero Punctuation’s Game of The Year in 2014.

A 2014 game is fairly old to be testing now, however SoM has a stable code and player base, and can still stress a PC down to the ones and zeroes. At the time, SoM was unique, offering a dynamic screen resolution setting allowing users to render at high resolutions that are then scaled down to the monitor. This form of natural oversampling was designed to let the user experience a truer vision of what the developers wanted, assuming you had the graphics hardware to power it but had a sub-4K monitor.

The title has an in-game benchmark, for which we run with an automated script implement the graphics settings, select the benchmark, and parse the frame-time output which is dumped on the drive. The graphics settings include standard options such as Graphical Quality, Lighting, Mesh, Motion Blur, Shadow Quality, Textures, Vegetation Range, Depth of Field, Transparency, and Tessellation. There are standard presets as well.

We run the benchmark at 1080p and a native 4K, using our 4K monitors, at the Ultra preset. Results are averaged across four runs and we report the average frame rate, 99th percentile frame rate, and time under analysis.

All of our benchmark results can also be found in our benchmark engine, Bench.

 

MSI GTX 1080 Gaming 8G Performance


1080p

4K

CPU Gaming Performance: Ashes of the Singularity Escalation CPU Gaming Performance: Rise of the Tomb Raider
Comments Locked

222 Comments

View All Comments

  • mapesdhs - Friday, October 6, 2017 - link

    It depends on the commenter. :D Sites get accused of being everything week to week.
  • Dr. Swag - Friday, October 6, 2017 - link

    Fanboys gonna fanboy
  • Gastec - Saturday, October 14, 2017 - link

    You mean "orthodox"? :)
  • prisonerX - Thursday, October 5, 2017 - link

    The only time we're going to get a fair review of an Intel product is when they no longer dominate the market.

    It's just the reality of how things work.
  • Ranger1065 - Friday, October 6, 2017 - link

    +1
  • rtho782 - Friday, October 6, 2017 - link

    Eh, as 8700k is currently unobtainium, it doesn't really matter, as I'm sure the review will be finished by the time it's possible to buy!!
  • Zingam - Saturday, October 7, 2017 - link

    The only problem you don't have a coffee this morning and the coffee shops are closed. You are feeling the smell but it is only in your imagination.
  • watzupken - Thursday, October 5, 2017 - link

    Not sure why there is no R5 1600 in the test though. It will be good to see how the 6 cores solution compete.
  • Ian Cutress - Thursday, October 5, 2017 - link

    We chose a dozen processors we thought would be best for the review graphs.
    As mentioned on every results page, you can find the other data in our Benchmark database, Bench.

    https://www.anandtech.com/bench/product/2024?vs=20...
  • yeeeeman - Thursday, October 5, 2017 - link

    Well, you either have bad inspiration or you chose the CPUs from AMD that most people won't buy.
    You are missing R7 1700 and R5 1600 which are ~ same as new Intel offerings in computing tasks but they cost less. So...

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now