In a bit of breaking news this morning, it appears that Intel has decided to cancel their Intel Developer Forum tradeshow going forward, including this summer’s expected IDF17.

In an announcement posted on the IDF website, Intel has announced that IDF is no more, and that the entire IDF program is ending.

Intel has evolved its event portfolio and decided to retire the IDF program moving forward. Thank you for nearly 20 great years with the Intel Developer Forum! Intel has a number of resources available on, including a Resource and Design Center with documentation, software, and tools for designers, engineers, and developers. As always, our customers, partners, and developers should reach out to their Intel representative with questions.

Previously, Intel had stated that there would not be an IDF in China this year. However an IDF was still expected in the US, albeit with a “new format.” Prior to today’s update, Intel’s IDF page stated the following (as can be seen on this cached copy of the page).

We are making changes to the Intel Developer Forum. This fall the event in San Francisco will have a new format and we will not be hosting an event in China. More details to come soon.

Meanwhile the official Moscone Center Calendar had (and still has) Intel reserving Moscone West from August 15th through the 17th.

IDF has been Intel's yearly home to major product announcements. This has spanned from CPU announcements like Skylake and Kaby Lake, to storage products like Optane, to networking fabrics like Omni-Path. So the cancellation of IDF means that Intel no longer has a (currently scheduled) venue to announce new products and update the public and investors on their plans. Though what's more interesting is how this will affect developers (both presenting and attending), who were the heart and soul of the show.

While it seems highly unlikely that Intel is doing away with trade shows and launch events entirely, it’s clear that something is afoot at Intel, and that as a result the traditional IDF is gone. With Intel's product roadmap becoming increasingly elongated and less aligned to a yearly cadence, a yearly tradeshow is obviously a harder event to hold and justify. But what will replace their combination trade show and venue for product announcements remains to be seen.

We’ve reached out to Intel for more information, and will update this story if we hear anything further.


Update 13:26 ET (Ian): I just got off the phone with Intel, discussing why IDF is being cancelled. The main reason I was given is that Intel has been changing rapidly over the last two-to-three years, especially as they are changing from a PC-centric company to a data-centric company. With the rise of AI, FPGAs, Optane, IoT, wireless comms, automotive, and the other new areas that Intel is moving into, Intel felt that IDF no longer fills the need when it comes to giving out information. As a result, the decision has been made to find new ways to communicate with the audience (media, developers and companies) and the ecosystem with targeted events. These will be like the recent AI Day or Manufacturing Day, or be connected to partner events, or involve separate geocentric events. So rather than have one big melee on everything, Intel is set to split its message across several different areas in the hope that it accurately digs deep enough into every area. I was told that Intel wants to find a better way to present the experiences in each of the fields, and this is the way to do that.

Personally, I feel the loss of an event like IDF is frustrating. Here was an annual event, usually held around the same time each year, that went deep into how Intel is pushing their portfolio in the PC space. In the last couple of years, the event expanded into IoT and automotive, and attendances kept rising (despite some of the hardware talks being attended by six people - trust me it was a fun talk nonetheless). With Intel deciding to move to a multitude of different events, I can understand the need to focus on specific parts at each event - if you want to deep on AI, hold an AI event; if you want to go deep on cloud computing, hold a Cloud Day. However, this gives Intel more opportunities to have a disconnected message, and not speak as one, especially if a particular event is split based on region. It also makes it harder to plan from our side, because undoubtedly we have to travel to an event at a few weeks notice that might occur the same time as a holiday that was paid for six months ago. IDF ensured regularity - there were keynotes on the important topics, and it was a chance for Intel to lay all the high-end cards on the table (and have everyone there to talk to). As noted, Intel also removed IDF Shenzhen from the event schedule. If Intel now plans to have something like an 'x86 developer conference' and have it held on the same day at different global locations, that only adds to the logistical complexity, and splits the key members of the team giving the talk(s) or answering the questions. Again, I can see Intel's reasoning for wanting to focus given the spectrum of markets it is now moving into, but IDF will be missed.



View All Comments

  • ImSpartacus - Monday, April 17, 2017 - link

    Coffee Lake****

  • Meteor2 - Monday, April 17, 2017 - link

    Of course, to complete, these new 6-core chips would have to be 12-thread too, and cost $250. Intel doesn't want to do that as it's slashing their margins. Unless AMD mess up in supply, they may have to. Reply
  • Alexvrb - Tuesday, April 18, 2017 - link

    Do we know how many cores AM4 supports? Could AMD build a 10+ core Ryzen for AM4? A 6C/12T Intel chip as the new Intel i7 is going to be $300+, most likely. That being the case, that leaves AMD a lot of room to respond in terms of product and pricing. If I was AMD I'd be more concerned about the possibility of Intel releasing a 4C/8T i5 and 4C/4T i3 processors. Of course, AMD could still probably undercut them a bit, but that's where the real challenge would occur. You can't just throw threads at the sub-$250 range, they found that out with Bulldozer. So they would need to be aggressive with price and/or release new models. Reply
  • blahsaysblah - Tuesday, April 18, 2017 - link

    Some would say the current 64GB capacity and memory bandwidth available with their 4 DIMMs/2 channel memory controller is a match for 16 threads. If anything it should be getting more capacity/bandwidth for workstation class workloads for IT professionals. Reply
  • Stan11003 - Monday, April 17, 2017 - link

    My suspicion is that Intel has technology in reserve for such an event as Ryzen. Reply
  • Gothmoth - Tuesday, April 18, 2017 - link

    lol.... yeah they R&D stuff just to hide it away.. makes sense.. for a carpenter or a milkman maybe. Reply
  • Gondalf - Monday, April 17, 2017 - link

    You look naive. Intel know what is Zen since the very first test silicon and likely they had many strong informations since the beginning of the work. In this moment Intel knows the absolute truth about Ryzen from at least two years.
    Why to answer to a 200mm2 craziness on a critical 14nm ?, Not enough profit in the very discounted Pc market. Try to image a 1800X sold at 150$ to OEMs.....not a big deal for AMD balance sheet.

    Better wait finer processes when they will yield enough.
  • JimmiG - Tuesday, April 18, 2017 - link

    Well Intel has a 6-core mainstream socket CPU in the works which should be able to compete with 8-core Ryzen. However if Zen 2 is significantly better than Ryzen, especially in gaming, then Intel is really in trouble. Reply
  • SkipPerk - Wednesday, April 19, 2017 - link

    Yes, but Intel has been dragging feet for years. Intel could have released the last few generations at least an year earlier. AMD's new toys will force them to compete again. I am looking forward to it. Reply
  • Kevin G - Monday, April 17, 2017 - link

    SkyLake-EP is coming with a selection of accelerators and IO (FPGA, Nervana tech, Omnipath etc.) that could have been shown off. Cannon Lake and other 10 nm parts could have also been shown off. Optane has a few products left on its road map to show off like NVDIMMS. Intel's Gen 10 graphics need a bit of mention as they're bringing DP 1.3/1.4 and HDMI 2.0 to the masses and possibly even FreeSync. These are already in the pipeline and could be shown off barring any major issues. Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now