Benchmarking Performance: CPU Rendering Tests

Rendering tests are a long-time favorite of reviewers and benchmarkers, as the code used by rendering packages is usually highly optimized to squeeze every little bit of performance out. Sometimes rendering programs end up being heavily memory dependent as well - when you have that many threads flying about with a ton of data, having low latency memory can be key to everything. Here we take a few of the usual rendering packages under Windows 10, as well as a few new interesting benchmarks.

Corona 1.3

Corona is a standalone package designed to assist software like 3ds Max and Maya with photorealism via ray tracing. It's simple - shoot rays, get pixels. OK, it's more complicated than that, but the benchmark renders a fixed scene six times and offers results in terms of time and rays per second. The official benchmark tables list user submitted results in terms of time, however I feel rays per second is a better metric (in general, scores where higher is better seem to be easier to explain anyway). Corona likes to pile on the threads, so the results end up being very staggered based on thread count.

Rendering: Corona Photorealism

Blender 2.78

For a render that has been around for what seems like ages, Blender is still a highly popular tool. We managed to wrap up a standard workload into the February 5 nightly build of Blender and measure the time it takes to render the first frame of the scene. Being one of the bigger open source tools out there, it means both AMD and Intel work actively to help improve the codebase, for better or for worse on their own/each other's microarchitecture.

Rendering: Blender 2.78

LuxMark

As a synthetic, LuxMark might come across as somewhat arbitrary as a renderer, given that it's mainly used to test GPUs, but it does offer both an OpenCL and a standard C++ mode. In this instance, aside from seeing the comparison in each coding mode for cores and IPC, we also get to see the difference in performance moving from a C++ based code-stack to an OpenCL one with a CPU as the main host. 

Rendering: LuxMark CPU C++Rendering: LuxMark CPU OpenCL

POV-Ray 3.7

Another regular benchmark in most suites, POV-Ray is another ray-tracer but has been around for many years. It just so happens that during the run up to AMD's Ryzen launch, the code base started to get active again with developers making changes to the code and pushing out updates. Our version and benchmarking started just before that was happening, but given time we will see where the POV-Ray code ends up and adjust in due course.

Rendering: POV-Ray 3.7

Cinebench R15

The latest version of CineBench has also become one of those 'used everywhere' benchmarks, particularly as an indicator of single thread performance. High IPC and high frequency gives performance in ST, whereas having good scaling and many cores is where the MT test wins out. 

Rendering: CineBench 15 SingleThreaded

Rendering: CineBench 15 MultiThreaded

 

Benchmarking Performance: CPU System Tests Benchmarking Performance: CPU Web Tests
Comments Locked

574 Comments

View All Comments

  • rudolphna - Thursday, March 2, 2017 - link

    Demonizing gamers in your post does nothing to contribute to your credibility, and will only turn off more well reasoned people from listening, or caring, about your opinion.
  • samer1970 - Friday, March 3, 2017 - link

    Gamers dont buy 8 cores chips .. If you want good AMD gaming chip at very low price , wait for the 6 and 4 cores Ryzen and then judge ...

    I expect the 4 cores/8 threads Ryzen at 150$ to blow Intel to pieces ... SOON ..

    Imagine a 4.5Ghz AMD Ryzen 4 cores for $150 then talk .
  • Sttm - Friday, March 3, 2017 - link

    4 cores that are noticeably slower than Intel's 4 cores, which sell in a handsome i5 package for $200. I think they need a software miracle and they need it fast to win over the gaming crowd.
  • Cooe - Sunday, February 28, 2021 - link

    Bet you're feeling like a massive idiot now if you actually got that 4c/4t Kaby Lake i5 over a 6c/12t Ryzen 5 1600. It was about as fast at 1080p gaming in 2017 as the R5, but nowadays isn't even in the same UNIVERSE as the Ryzen chip. Let alone the performance difference for literally EVERYTHING else.
  • Diji1 - Thursday, March 2, 2017 - link

    Hurr durr you don't like what I like so you're a dumbo making me smarter than you! (yes, I know but they cannot see it themselves because their so smart in their own imagination).
  • JoeyJoJo123 - Thursday, March 2, 2017 - link

    What exactly are you trying to say here?
  • Holliday75 - Thursday, March 2, 2017 - link

    I think it was "Hurr durr".
  • BikeDude - Friday, March 3, 2017 - link

    sounded more like 'hold door' to me?
  • star-affinity - Thursday, March 2, 2017 - link

    I didn't know what is considered "wasting your life" is objective – please elaborate. What do you do with your life that makes it better than someone who likes to plays RPGs?
  • Dug - Friday, March 3, 2017 - link

    I'm so glad you are the one to judge what people are when they play games. Your insight and thought process is inspiring.
    I'm only to guess that what you do with a computer is going to change the world.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now