CPU Performance, Short Form

For our motherboard reviews, we use our short form testing method. These tests usually focus on if a motherboard is using MultiCore Turbo (the feature used to have maximum turbo on at all times, giving a frequency advantage), or if there are slight gains to be had from tweaking the firmware. We leave the BIOS settings at default and memory at JEDEC (DDR4-2133 C15) for these tests, making it very easy to see which motherboards have MCT enabled by default.

Video Conversion – Handbrake v0.9.9: link

Handbrake is a media conversion tool that was initially designed to help DVD ISOs and Video CDs into more common video formats. For HandBrake, we take two videos (a 2h20 640x266 DVD rip and a 10min double UHD 3840x4320 animation short) and convert them to x264 format in an MP4 container.  Results are given in terms of the frames per second processed, and HandBrake uses as many threads as possible.

HandBrake v0.9.9 LQ Film

HandBrake v0.9.9 2x4K

The X99A Gaming Pro has MCT enabled, along with a minor adjustment in the natural base frequency, leading to healthy scores in the LQ test which thrives on small frequency margins.

Compression – WinRAR 5.0.1: link

Our WinRAR test from 2013 is updated to the latest version of WinRAR at the start of 2014. We compress a set of 2867 files across 320 folders totaling 1.52 GB in size – 95% of these files are small typical website files, and the rest (90% of the size) are small 30 second 720p videos.

WinRAR 5.01, 2867 files, 1.52 GB

The MSI board scores what we would expect for an MCT enabled product in WinRAR.

Point Calculations – 3D Movement Algorithm Test: link

3DPM is a self-penned benchmark, taking basic 3D movement algorithms used in Brownian Motion simulations and testing them for speed. High floating point performance, MHz and IPC wins in the single thread version, whereas the multithread version has to handle the threads and loves more cores. For a brief explanation of the platform agnostic coding behind this benchmark, see my forum post here.

3D Particle Movement: Single Threaded

3D Particle Movement: MultiThreaded

Whether it's the extra base frequency or the underlying software, but the X99A Gaming Pro Carbon scores almost 2% higher than any other X99 board in our single threaded 3DPM test. This translates into a good score in multithreaded as well.

Rendering – POV-Ray 3.7: link

The Persistence of Vision Ray Tracer, or POV-Ray, is a freeware package for as the name suggests, ray tracing. It is a pure renderer, rather than modeling software, but the latest beta version contains a handy benchmark for stressing all processing threads on a platform. We have been using this test in motherboard reviews to test memory stability at various CPU speeds to good effect – if it passes the test, the IMC in the CPU is stable for a given CPU speed. As a CPU test, it runs for approximately 2-3 minutes on high-end platforms.

POV-Ray 3.7 Beta RC4

Similar to 3DPM, the X99A Gaming Pro Carbon seems to get a good edge here.

Synthetic – 7-Zip 9.2: link

As an open source compression tool, 7-Zip is a popular tool for making sets of files easier to handle and transfer. The software offers up its own benchmark, to which we report the result.

7-zip Benchmark

Another performance win for the MSI. We double checked these numbers with another fresh OS and saw the same results.

System Performance Single GTX 980 Gaming Performance
Comments Locked

37 Comments

View All Comments

  • niva - Monday, February 6, 2017 - link

    We get your point, now are you going to get the point that it's "GAMING Pro" and not just "pro"?

    I mean it's not like LEDs help you game better, but this board caters to that crowd. MSI has other boards that are for workstations specifically for "real pros" like you.
  • BrokenCrayons - Monday, February 6, 2017 - link

    I think that some of the gripes go back to adding the LEDs and necessary control mechanisms for them drives up cost. For situations like yours where you're going to disable the LEDs anyway, there's not much point in them being included at all. When someone is buying a product at the MSRP, they're going to soak up that cost or seek out a different product with possibly a less desirable set of features and capabilites. It's a minor quibble, I admit, but you know how people tend to build trivial things into more trouble than is reasonable.
  • ChristopherF - Monday, February 6, 2017 - link

    Great article Ian! On page 2 the chipset is listed as z170
  • fanofanand - Monday, February 6, 2017 - link

    Who is buying into X99 today? This is a chipset released in 2014!
  • joex4444 - Monday, February 6, 2017 - link

    People who need more than 4C/8T.
  • wolfemane - Monday, February 6, 2017 - link

    Or those that think they need more than 4c/8t
  • galta - Monday, February 6, 2017 - link

    People who really need (or really think they need, or think they really need etc.) more than 4c/8t usually don't like leds.
  • doggface - Tuesday, February 7, 2017 - link

    Speak for yourself.
    Pfft. You can build a decent PC and take care of the aesthetics at the same time.
  • fanofanand - Monday, February 6, 2017 - link

    Those people would likely be better served waiting a month for Ryzen. We won't know until we know, but it still seems like a ludicrous buy today on 2/6/17.
  • MarkieGcolor - Tuesday, February 7, 2017 - link

    Yea but maybe you can find good deals and who likes to wait?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now