MSI X99A Gaming Pro Carbon Conclusion

For any user going down the high-end desktop route, there are a few platform choices: X99 for the latest, X79 for a good second hand deal, perhaps an AMD FX on a budget, or dual processor for when you really need it. Admittedly that last one is more for the producer of business route, but there have been some recent 2P deals that we might cover in a future review. But if you want the latest, X99 and Broadwell-E tops that chart. 

We've actually had the MSI X99A Gaming Pro Carbon in the labs for a while, running various tests, and finally got around to doing review level tests on the board itself. It's certainly an interesting package, going after a sleek back look from the Carbon name but ultimately having substantial LEDs places everywhere. It features a good portion of MSI's latest hardware upgrades, such as PCIe and DRAM guards, an overclocking dial, USB 3.1 and PCIe storage. 

The full design aims to be a complete board for most X99 HEDT builds - a full set of DRAM slots, the ten SATA ports from the chipset, PCIe slots arranged to prioritise up to 3-way graphics (four way is supported but one card has to be single slot), USB 3.1 in Type-A and Type-C configurations with the ASMedia ASM1142 controller, an I218-V network controller, an enhanced Realtek ALC1150 audio configuration, and PCIe storage via an M.2 or a U.2 (only one port is supported at once in PCIe mode). To add to this, an internal USB 3.0 Type-C port is designed to aid cables to a front panel that supports Type-C passthrough (such as 1-to-1 or 1-to-hub).

On the LED side, the four zones on the board are coming trolled through the bundled software. There is a wide variety of opinion about the march towards LED everything in the PC space, particularly gaming PCs. Whatever your thoughts, speaking to the manufacturers results in one clear message: it sells. In the case of one company, a tier one for what they make, they told me that the RGB stuff accounts for 70-80% of all their sales now. This is partly why we see it almost everywhere, particularly on high-end gaming gear. The kickback is that it can always be turned off (usually), and in MSI's case a probable justification is that under the Carbon naming, they board is designed to be aesthetically good/neutral, regardless of the LED setting. 

On performance, while MSI sets no records for power, USB speed or POST time, the MSI X99A Gaming Pro Carbon goes to the top in nearly all our CPU performance tests. Initially I put the good CPU results out of the box down to multicore turbo plus a variance in the base frequency, but given that every time I probe the base frequency I always get 100 MHz, it makes me wonder if there's something suspect or otherwise. Most of our benchmarks are custom and not industry synthetics, so nothing like software detection could be in play. Nonetheless, it ultimately only effects the user to the extend that there seems to be marginally more CPU performance. GPU performance seems unaffected. 

At $330, the MSI X99A Gaming Pro Carbon comes across as an analog to the X99S SLI PLUS, which received a recommended award for being a sufficient performer but at a low cost. The X99A Gaming Pro Carbon has a good set of features, works well out of the box, but having those few extra features (PCIe and DRAM guards, PCIe storage, USB 3.1, improved audio, a sleeker design and LEDs), comes in at $100 more MSRP or, given today pricing, $130 difference. MSI's biggest competition is itself -  the SLI PLUS is a hard board to ignore at that price.

Other Intel X99 Motherboard Reviews by AnandTech:
Prices Correct at time of each review

$750: The ASRock X99 WS-E 10G Review [link]
$600: The ASUS X99-E-WS 10G Review [link]
$600: The ASRock X99 Extreme11 Review [link]
$500: The ASUS Rampage V Extreme Review [link]
$400: The ASUS X99-Deluxe Review [link]
$340: The GIGABYTE X99-Gaming G1 WiFi Review [link]
$330: The ASRock X99 OC Formula Review [link]
$330: The MSI X99A Gaming Pro Carbon Review [this review]
$323: The ASRock X99 WS Review [link]
$310: The GIGABYTE X99-UD7 WiFi Review [link]
$310: The ASUS X99 Sabertooth Review [link]
$300: The GIGABYTE X99-SOC Champion Review [link]
$300: The ASRock X99E-ITX Review [link]
$300: The MSI X99S MPower Review [link]
$275: The ASUS X99-A Review [link]
$241: The MSI X99S SLI PLUS Review [link]
 

Single GTX 980 Gaming Performance
Comments Locked

37 Comments

View All Comments

  • niva - Monday, February 6, 2017 - link

    We get your point, now are you going to get the point that it's "GAMING Pro" and not just "pro"?

    I mean it's not like LEDs help you game better, but this board caters to that crowd. MSI has other boards that are for workstations specifically for "real pros" like you.
  • BrokenCrayons - Monday, February 6, 2017 - link

    I think that some of the gripes go back to adding the LEDs and necessary control mechanisms for them drives up cost. For situations like yours where you're going to disable the LEDs anyway, there's not much point in them being included at all. When someone is buying a product at the MSRP, they're going to soak up that cost or seek out a different product with possibly a less desirable set of features and capabilites. It's a minor quibble, I admit, but you know how people tend to build trivial things into more trouble than is reasonable.
  • ChristopherF - Monday, February 6, 2017 - link

    Great article Ian! On page 2 the chipset is listed as z170
  • fanofanand - Monday, February 6, 2017 - link

    Who is buying into X99 today? This is a chipset released in 2014!
  • joex4444 - Monday, February 6, 2017 - link

    People who need more than 4C/8T.
  • wolfemane - Monday, February 6, 2017 - link

    Or those that think they need more than 4c/8t
  • galta - Monday, February 6, 2017 - link

    People who really need (or really think they need, or think they really need etc.) more than 4c/8t usually don't like leds.
  • doggface - Tuesday, February 7, 2017 - link

    Speak for yourself.
    Pfft. You can build a decent PC and take care of the aesthetics at the same time.
  • fanofanand - Monday, February 6, 2017 - link

    Those people would likely be better served waiting a month for Ryzen. We won't know until we know, but it still seems like a ludicrous buy today on 2/6/17.
  • MarkieGcolor - Tuesday, February 7, 2017 - link

    Yea but maybe you can find good deals and who likes to wait?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now