At CES 2017, Intel introduced a new form-factor for computing platforms in order to enable easy development, configuration, maintenance, repair and upgrade of various devices. Intel’s Compute Card is as small as a credit card, but, packs everything needed for computing, including the CPU, DRAM, storage, communications and I/O. The first cards are set to be introduced in mid-2017.

Computing has become so ubiquitous nowadays that almost every more or less sophisticated piece of hardware has a microprocessor inside. Many such devices are designed to operate for years, but, since computer chips inside them get outdated, it is almost impossible to upgrade their functionality (e.g., add new security capabilities, speed up processing, etc.) without replacing the whole unit, or a significant part of it. Alternatively, if a CPU or a memory IC fails, repair of such a device may cost a lot in terms of money and effort. This translates to downtime and lost revenue. Such things happen because of various reasons, but the main two are proprietary platforms with tight integration and no upgrade path, or complex architectures that do not allow for a quick replacement of faulty components. The list of such devices includes everything from business PCs to point-of-sale kiosks and from smart TVs to commercial equipment.

The Intel Compute Card has been designed to be a universal computing platform for different kinds of devices, including those that do not exist yet. The ultimate goal is to simplify the way companies develop equipment, use, maintain, repair, and upgrade it. Creators of actual devices have to design a standard Intel Compute Card slot into their product and then choose an Intel Compute Card that meets their requirements in terms of feature-set and price. For example, PC makers could create systems in all-in-one or clamshell form-factors and then use Compute Cards instead of motherboards. For corporate customers that need to provide a lot of flexibility (and, perhaps, solve some security concerns too) - every employee has a card and can switch between PCs. In other markets such as automated retail kiosks, vendors can easily provide upgrades to deliver better functionality as Intel releases new Compute Cards in the future.

Intel Compute Card at Glance
CPU Various Intel SoCs / SiPs, including Intel Core with vPro (up to 6W TDP)
DRAM, NAND Integrated
Cooling Fanless, but, I/O docks may have their own thermal design
Dimensions 94.5 mm × 55 mm × 5 mm
I/O Physical USB-C + Extension
Logical USB, PCIe, HDMI, DP and additional signals
Wireless Wi-Fi, Bluetooth
Docking Integrated locking mechanism
Launch Partners Dell, HP, Lenovo, Sharp and local companies
Initial Availability Mid-2017

From a technology standpoint, Intel’s Compute Card resembles the company’s Compute Stick PC. However, its purpose is much wider: it is a small device that packs an Intel SoC or SiP (including Kaby Lake-based Core processors with vPro and other technologies), DRAM, NAND flash storage, a wireless module and so on into a small enclosure. Nonetheless, there are a number of important differences between the Compute Card and the Compute Stick. The Compute Card is a sealed system with “flexible I/O” in the form of a USB Type-C and an extension connector. The “flexible I/O” is not Thunderbolt (obviously, due to power consumption concerns), but it handles USB, PCIe, HDMI, DisplayPort connectivity and has some extra pins for future/proprietary use.

Intel is currently working with a number of partners to enable the Compute Cards ecosystem. The list of global players includes Dell, HP, Lenovo and Sharp. There are also regional partners interested in the new form-factor, including Seneca Data, InFocus, Contec DTx, TabletKiosk and Pasuntech.

At the moment, Intel and its partners are not discussing their Compute Card-based projects, which is understandable. Moreover, do not expect all these companies to release their Compute Card hardware simultaneously because different equipment has different design and validation cycles.

Speaking of the form-factor itself, this is by far not the first form-factor the size of a credit card or something close (e.g., Mobile-ITX, Pico-ITX were announced, but never took off). However, this one seems easy to integrate and it is backed by Intel, which gives it credibility. There are a number of applications (and usage scenarios) that could take advantage of the Compute Card right away (e.g., corporate PCs, smart TVs, digital point-of-sales, emerging devices, etc.). However, there are also many embedded applications that just require uninterrupted operation without any need to upgrade. For those, traditional industrial PCs and boards will continue to be the mainstay, and the credit card form-factor will not bring any clear advantages.

The other interesting aspect here is the future of the Compute Stick form factor. Given that the ARM-based HDMI sticks are not a popular form factor any more, it is not surprising that Intel has also not decided to update the Compute Stick lineup with Kaby Lake. Intel indicated that they would be evaluating the future of the Compute Stick in 2018, and decide if it warrants an update with the latest processors at that time. Our opinion is that the Compute Stick form factor has reached the end of its life, and it is for the Compute Card to carry on the miniaturization revolution. The Compute Card has much more flexibility in terms of the differentiation from the vendors' side, and it is not encumbered by an active cooling mechanism. Obviously, the ability to just plug the device into a HDMI port is not there, but, the Compute Card, by itself, is light enough to just hang directly off a display's HDMI port. Therefore, it is possible that some vendors can deliver a Compute Stick-like platform with the Compute Card also (albeit, with a slightly different form factor).

We expect to hear more about Compute Card related projects in Q3, either during Computex or Intel's Developer Forum.

Source: Intel

POST A COMMENT

35 Comments

View All Comments

  • shabs42 - Thursday, January 12, 2017 - link

    But the card won't be nearly as expensive as the whole phone. You aren't buying a new display, battery, speakers, sensors, antenna, or case. Reply
  • MrSpadge - Thursday, January 12, 2017 - link

    In principle I agree. However, a new card from Intel will probably be way more expensive than a new complete low end smartphone, or last year's mid range. Reply
  • ddriver - Wednesday, January 11, 2017 - link

    "Alternatively, if a CPU or a memory IC fails, repair of such a device may cost a lot in terms of money and effort."

    Sounds great, except... that this card doesn't look very reparable. So if a component craps out, you pretty much have to get a new one.

    If you want quick and efficient repairability, then just create products with modular motherboards, making it possible to replace cpu, memory and whatnot. An opaque card is not really much progress in this aspect.

    As for being "card sized" I reckon it could actually be made about half to third that size, and a tad thinner also. No big whoop.
    Reply
  • peterfares - Wednesday, January 11, 2017 - link

    Current Smart TVs have their processing fixed in place, not replaceable at all. These cards shouldn't be super expensive, replacing them should be a good solution. Reply
  • ddriver - Wednesday, January 11, 2017 - link

    "These cards shouldn't be super expensive"

    Do you have a source on this? The stick wasn't exactly a good value.

    Also, being a "sealed card" it will likely be less repairable than a TV board. Even in the case of a component that can easily be replaced.
    Reply
  • shelbystripes - Wednesday, January 11, 2017 - link

    No, he means the TV will be more repairable, by replacing the sealed card. Quit thinking about it in terms of servicing the individual components inside the card. The card becomes a mass produced commodity item. Even at a couple hundred dollars, it's going to be a lot cheaper than finding someone to replace a custom board for your $8000 OLED TV that was only designed and built for their model. Reply
  • ddriver - Wednesday, January 11, 2017 - link

    But then again, the same would apply for a simple modular PCB which the TV maker can manufacture itself rather than purchasing intel's sealed card, for better margins.

    It is not like 8000$ OLED TV makers are strangers to making custom embedded boards. Why should they put their margins into intel's pocket when they can get the components and assemble their own plug-and-play board for half the cost and either make the product more affordable or enjoy better margins?

    I somehow doubt the industry will be overly enthusiastic about that, regardless of how much it is hyped. They are in for the money, to put in their pockets, not intel's. They can achieve just as good service times with their own pluggable boards. The savings on R&D will be minuscule and irrelevant for big volume players, plus there is absolutely nothing preventing them from creating their own "universal" solutions, they could have done that years ago, however in most of the cases it is far most efficient to come up with a custom solution, which can be tailored to the specific application at minimum cost. One size doesn't fit all, in many cases it will be overkill, in many cases it won't suffice, it will be just right only in a few.
    Reply
  • Vlad_Da_Great - Wednesday, January 11, 2017 - link

    Thinking with your az. Nobody wants to repair products especially in the consumer segment. You just buy new. This card has very little chance in the consumer. Regarding the savings, maintenance will be like the difference between ICE vs battery. Reply
  • MrSpadge - Thursday, January 12, 2017 - link

    Did you ever ask your washing machine manufacturer how much it costs to get a service techician out to your house and replace the mainboard / electronics? At least 100$ for the technician, another for the 100+$ for the custom spare part". Or if some electronics in the car get flaky. Dismantling things to access it probably already cost 200+$, unless you can find a back-door repair shop which is able to do it.

    Now compare that with a 30$ commodity compute card which the user can switch himself.
    Reply
  • ddriver - Thursday, January 12, 2017 - link

    LoL, keep dreaming. Even if utilized, the card would still have to be replaced by a certified technician, who will still charge you the 100$, plus 300-400$ for the spare card.

    Again, nobody in the industry is interested in making LESS MONEY. If you actually believe that you should be very worried about your mental state.
    Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now