The Cooler and Cheaper Choice

For people coming over from our Core i7-7700K review, where we heralded a new mainstream performance champion, to say that the Core i5-7600K is the smarter choice could be a little confusing. There are several factors in play which are going to make buying the i5-7600K more pertinent to everyone except pure extreme speed freaks (wait, I thought everyone reading this was…!).

For $86 less, the Core i5-7600K scores about 80% of what the Core i7-7700K does in the heavy instruction benchmarks, all while doing it at 30C less and 20W less. If you need extra performance, overclocking it to 7700K frequencies is super easy, and you still come in under power for the extra performance. While our gaming benchmarks aren’t necessarily the newest W10 busting titles (we’re retesting in Feb with a new benchmark suite), the Core i5 and Core i7 performed almost identical in every test.

If you are user for which money is no object, then the i7 makes sense because it is guaranteed frequency in the system and you have probably bought extra cooling anyway. For a user that needs another $100 to go for a better graphics card but still wants near top mainstream performance, the Core i5 is the smart choice.


Recommended by AnandTech
The Intel Core i5-7600K: The Smarter Choice

As part of our Kaby Lake coverage, we have some other awesome reviews to check out.

Intel Launches 7th Generation Kaby Lake (Overview and Core Improvements)
The Intel Core i7-7700K Review: The New Out-of-the-box Performance Champion
The Intel Core i5-7600K Review: The More Amenable Mainstream Performer
The Intel Core i3-7350K Review: When a Core i3 Nearly Matches the Core i7-2600K

Upcoming (we’re at CES and didn’t have time to finish these yet):

Calculating Generational IPC Changes from Sandy Bridge to Kaby Lake
Intel Core i7-7700K, i5-7600K and i3-7350K Overclocking: Hitting 5.0 GHz on AIR
Intel Launches 200-Series Chipset Breakdown: Z270, H270, B250, Q250, C232
Intel Z270 Motherboard Preview: A Quick Look at 80+ Motherboards

Power and Overclocking
Comments Locked

70 Comments

View All Comments

  • Gastec - Wednesday, January 11, 2017 - link

    I remember that when Windows XP came out, more than 15 years ago, eveybody was crying out loud (some hysterically) that Windows 98 is waaay better and they will never upgrade to XP.
    But enough about operating systems, that discussion is irrelevant. I'm more interested in learning about the things (voices?) that YOU HEAR and record :)
  • serpretetsky - Tuesday, January 3, 2017 - link

    Maybe I went over the article too fast, is there something specific about this chip to windows 10?
  • nico_mach - Tuesday, January 3, 2017 - link

    Speedstep is unique to Windows 10.
  • Bullwinkle J Moose - Tuesday, January 3, 2017 - link

    probably not but do any of the motherboards support IDE ?

    Does the chip itself have XP drivers?

    Probably not

    Waste of money
  • Murloc - Tuesday, January 3, 2017 - link

    if you don't like windows you can use linux.

    With XP you're not getting the most recent versions of directx anyway so you're probably not gaming on it, so what's the reason for sticking to windows?
  • doggface - Wednesday, January 4, 2017 - link

    Seriously... Wow. Troll much.
  • Bullwinkle J Moose - Wednesday, January 4, 2017 - link

    never
  • Shadow7037932 - Wednesday, January 4, 2017 - link

    Loss of $500-1K from you is not a big deal for Intel or any other OEM.
  • Outlander_04 - Tuesday, January 3, 2017 - link

    Looks like intel are worried about Zen enough they have bumped up stock clocks .
    They have achieved that with out too much extra power consumption which is something I guess , but kaby lake is not a step forward
  • Murloc - Tuesday, January 3, 2017 - link

    optimization is just that, why would we expect something more?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now