Thermal Aspects and Power Consumption

The thermal design of the enclosures for HDD-based DAS devices is important because hard drives can't withstand as high a temperature range as flash-based devices. Higher temperatures tend to lower the reliability of the drives. In order to identify the effectiveness with which the enclosure can take away heat from the internal drive, we instrumented our robocopy DAS benchmark suite to record various parameters while the robocopy process took place in the background. Internal temperatures can only be gathered for enclosures that support S.M.A.R.T passthrough. Readers can click on the graphs below to view the full-sized version.

Storage Enclosure Thermal Characteristics

The first aspect to note in the above graphs is that the drive temperatures don't get too bad for either unit. The My Book does get close to 50C at the end of the benchmarking, while the My Passport is slightly lower. As expected, these temperatures do not have any effect on the transfer rates. There are no SMR (shingled magnetic recording) firmware shenanigans that throttle transfer rates after a certain amount of data is written into the drive in one go. That said, it is possible that the drives could be kept cooler with a different thermal design, though it is likely that the current design strikes the best balance when considered in conjunction with implementation cost.

Power consumption is measured while processing the same workload on each of the DAS units. CrystalDiskMark 5.1.2's benchmark traces with a region size of 8GB and the number of repetitions set to 5 are used. For bus-powered devices, Plugable's USBC-TKEY power delivery sniffer was placed between the host PC and the storage bridge to record the power consumption. For AC-powered devices, the Ubiquiti mFi mPower Pro was used for the same purpose. The average power consumption for each access trace was recorded. The pictures below present the numbers in a compact and easy to compare manner.

Power Consumption - CrystalDiskMark

The power consumption numbers are not surprising - the AC-powered My Book 8TB consumes between 8W and 10W at the wall for different access traces, while the bus-powered My Passport 4TB consumes between 2.5W and 3.5W for the same. At idle, the My Book 8TB consumes around 6.9W, and that goes to 0W when the internal drive spins down. On the other hand, the My Passport 4TB consumes around 1.45W at idle, and, around 0.89W with the internal drive spun down.

Performance Benchmarks Miscellaneous Aspects and Concluding Remarks
Comments Locked

35 Comments

View All Comments

  • Samus - Monday, October 17, 2016 - link

    I appreciated Ganesh pointing that out too. Photos next round Ganesh? Also perhaps check if the 3.5" variant can be used internally on an AHCI SATA controller.
  • azrael- - Monday, October 17, 2016 - link

    Hmm... I find the new enclosures more clunky. At least the My Passport 2.5" one. Only upside I see is that they are somewhat more stackable. Not sure that's the intention, though.
  • coburn_c - Tuesday, October 18, 2016 - link

    Adding my two cents. WDC 2.5" drives are utter garbage. Seagate 7200 3TB+ models, especially the Chinese manufactured models are utter garbage. The rest is a lottery.
  • leo321 - Wednesday, July 25, 2018 - link

    When it comes to external hard disk, I always choose western digital. I find the performance better and is compatible with most of the popular platforms. Though I have faced a lot of data loss issue from my HDD. This is very common anyway. I use a Dell laptop. Having installed a <a href="https://www.f2help.com/">Laptop data recovery tool </a> or a software is necessary. HDD is used for backup but users need to think of restoring too.
  • sp00n82 - Saturday, July 20, 2019 - link

    Interestingly, when I used a frequency analyzer app on my mobile to measure the Hertz value for my WD My Book 8 TB (WDC WD80EZAZ-11TDBA0 according to CrystalDiskInfo) it returned a value of 120 Hertz. Which points to a rotation speed of 7200 rpm (7200 rotations per minute / 60 = 120 rotations per second = 120 Hertz).

    Other 5400 rpm drives show a value of the expected 90 Hertz, which indicate that they indeed rotate with "true" 5400 rpm.
    CrystalDiskInfo also shows a rotation speed of 5400 rpm for the My Book in its info, but somehow this doesn't seem to be the case.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now