Still Image Performance

Now that we’ve discussed the basics of the iPhone 7 and 7 Plus camera we can start to get into how it actually performs relative to the iPhone 6s and 6s Plus as well the current competition on the market. While we normally run an ISO test to check spatial resolution this has been deferred to a future portion of the review. Unfortunately we don't really have the ability to do time-invariant testing here in a serious manner to the same extent that an OEM might, so we're effectively limited to tripod comparisons of real-world subjects.

Daytime Photography

In this kind of scenario the iPhone 7 and 7 Plus are directly comparable in the 1x mode. Because the primary camera has OIS and the secondary camera doesn't, it looks like it's fairly difficult for Apple to do an exact pixel to pixel correlation to the extent that the two outputs can be merged into a single image. As a result it's fairly obvious that the 1x mode has less detail than the 2x mode here. I can really see how this would be useful in general, as the longer focal length means more detail relative to anything else on the market but also allows for more interesting framing. The 1x camera is identical to the iPhone 7, and here it's definitely noticeable that the iPhone 7 can't quite keep up with the Galaxy S7 or HTC 10 in sheer detail in these kinds of shots.

Daytime Photography 2

In the interest of trying to not just take a single landscape photo and declare it to be a representative sample for all photos ever taken of all time with a smartphone in daytime conditions, I went ahead and took another sample shot of a mostly static subject. Here the iPhone 7 Plus in 1x mode is pretty much comparable to the iPhone 6s and Galaxy S7 as far as detail goes. I would argue that the HTC 10 captures slightly more detail at the center, but this probably isn't a surprise when the sensor is significantly larger. It's also worth noting that the iPhone 7 Plus manages to show better dynamic range here as the highlights off to the right retain more color detail than most devices tested and the shadows contain more detail that what is found on the Galaxy S7 or the iPhone 6s Plus. Once again, at 2x the iPhone 7 Plus is really just ridiculously good at capturing the sheer amount of detail that the tree has which isn't really captured by the 1x mode as most of the detail has to be blurred away to avoid aliasing. It's truly impressive how the iPhone 7 and 7 Plus are actually capable of keeping up with the Galaxy S7 despite a smaller sensor, and we're really seeing the product of Apple's ISP lead here.

Low Light Photography 1

It probably is worth mentioning here that in low light the iPhone 7 Plus doesn't actually use the secondary camera at all due to its smaller aperture and lack of image stabilization, which means that the iPhone 7 and 7 Plus are identical in low light performance. Interestingly enough detail is fairly comparable between the iPhone 6s Plus and iPhones 7, with some minor adjustment to favor more noise reduction. I'm inclined to say that the Galaxy S7 and iPhone 7 are basically comparable here but the oversharpening on the Galaxy S7 remains fairly obvious and I would expect it to outperform in detail here but it's just comparable to the iPhone 7 due to the rather smeary noise reduction. The HTC 10 is the clear winner here as far as detail goes but both the Galaxy S7 and HTC 10 really oversaturate the green shrubs while the iPhone 7 is much closer to what it should actually be. The oversaturated, smeary look that seems to dominate the Galaxy S7 output continues to be seriously off-putting for me.

Low Light Photography 2

It's interesting to see how Apple's noise and noise reduction seems to have changed from the 6 to 6s to 7 here. Detail is functionality identical but the iPhone 7 and 7 Plus clearly handle shadows better here as there's more detail and noise is controlled noticeably better with better detail and less visible noise. It's really impressive what Apple's processing is able to pull off here when sensor size and sensor technology hasn't really advanced that much from the iPhone 6s to iPhone 7. This is especially obvious when compared to the Galaxy S7, which has comparable overall detail but the noise reduction used is much more splotchy and has obvious oversharpening if you look too closely. Again, relative to the HTC 10 the sensor size deficit is very obvious here if you try to read the text on the trash cans, but the HTC 10's gamma and noise reduction algorithms are just not competitive in the shadows and it's obvious that there are uncorrected optical distortions in the light flares. The HTC 10 also tends to feel like it has a filter over the entire photo that makes it look a little soft compared to the iPhone 7 even if it does have better detail in some parts of the frame.

Low Light Photography 3

For whatever reason this scene always seems to at least mildly challenging. Here we can really start to see the softness that I'm talking about with the HTC 10, as the white pillar "bleeds" a bit into the brick wall exterior of Knudsen Hall. Detail on the iPhone 7 and 7 Plus remains comparable to the iPhone 6s Plus, but with noticeably less noise. The Galaxy S7 manages to deliver similar levels of detail to the iPhone 7, but it definitely oversaturates the red brick colors which might be appealing but really isn't accurate when you look at the RAW reference. The noise reduction on the Galaxy S7 is noticeably splotchier here and gets much worse if you look at the top right quarter of the photo. I would actually say the iPhone 7 outperforms just about everything here but the LG G5, which has better detail but a really strange color rendition.

Overall, the iPhone 7 camera is impressive and I would argue is holistically a better camera for still photos than the Galaxy S7 on the basis of more accurate color rendition, cleaner noise reduction, and lack of aggressive sharpening. It may not be as lightning fast as the Galaxy S7 or have as many party tricks, but what it does have is extremely well executed. The HTC 10 is definitely better than the iPhone 7 at delivering sheer detail when only comparing the 28mm focal length camera, but the post-processing has a tendency to bleed colors in low light which sometimes causes the images to look a bit soft. In daytime the iPhone 7 Plus' 56mm equivalent camera helps to keep it well ahead of the curve when it comes to sheer detail and really is a revelatory experience after years of using smartphone cameras that have focal lengths as short as 22mm and can't really capture what the eye sees. However, in low light the sensor size deficit really starts to become obvious. I suspect the Pixel and Pixel XL will make this especially clear. If there's really no room to go up the ladder in sensor size, Apple really needs to consider some radical approaches to improving sensor sensitivity such as RWB pixel layouts or using the dual camera for an oversampling scheme.

Camera Architecture and UX Video Performance
Comments Locked

377 Comments

View All Comments

  • indifferent - Wednesday, October 12, 2016 - link

    I second blackcrayon, UtilityMax you need to read more about iphone.
  • UtilityMax - Wednesday, October 12, 2016 - link

    I don't need to read more about the iphone. I have used all the models up tp 5S. There is no way to upload my media into the iphones without using the garbage software that's known as itunes. (The last time I installed it on a PC, it literally deleted my BluRay drive), There are some also very ridiculous an inferiour methods to by pass that such as the using a third party software like VLC. None of that works as well as plugging my android phone with USB cable into a PC and copy/paste directly all the files that I need on the phone.
  • blackcrayon - Wednesday, October 12, 2016 - link

    Ahh, I guess you meant to say there is no way to upload music to the stock music app (unless you use streaming/cloud which I find a much better solution anyway), or upload photos to the stock photos app (unless you stream, which I find a much better solution anyway). You didn't clarify. But you still don't *need* iTunes to put "media" on the phone. Also, you might consider that 802.11ac probably gets data onto an iPhone faster than using USB at this point...
  • jlabelle2 - Thursday, October 13, 2016 - link

    No Blackcrayon, UtilityMax is correct. If I want to put my FLAC on my iPhone (because Qobuz and others sites only propose FLAC and not ALAC), I need to 1/ open iTunes, 2/ look for the apps section, 3/ find the app like VLC that allow file transfer 4/ make a drag-n-drop, 5/ turn on the app on the iPhone and wait the synchronization.
    That is really CRAZY that in 2016, you just cannot simply drag-n-drop from the computer on the iPhone.

    "unless you use streaming/cloud which I find a much better solution anyway"
    if you do not care about audio quality, have unlimited data, and have ALWAYS an internet connection wherever you are, 100% of the time, ...yeah, it can be a good enough solution for you.

    "Also, you might consider that 802.11ac probably gets data onto an iPhone faster than using USB at this point"
    The time where you will even remotely transfer as fast 30Go of music with wifi than USB you will call me buddy. But you are in dreamland.
  • techconc - Thursday, October 13, 2016 - link

    No jlabelle2, blackcrayon is correct. There are multiple solutions for accomplishing file transfer without iTunes. Some as simple as AirDrop. For PC users, there are file transfer apps. There are cloud solutions, including iCloud itself. I would suggest that the majority of iPhone users don't even use iTunes at all anymore for any sort of phone syncing. This isn't 2007 anymore... time to update our memes.
  • jlabelle2 - Friday, October 14, 2016 - link

    "Some as simple as AirDrop"
    No help, I have a Windows PC, like 93% of the population out there. Beside, can you AirDrop FLAC?

    "For PC users, there are file transfer apps"
    Great, so your answer to "you have to use a special program like iTunes to transfer dumb things like music" is "no, not true, you can use ANOTHER special program"???
    What an answer is that?

    "There are cloud solutions, including iCloud itself."
    How do you transfer FLAC into your iPhone with iCloud? Could you share your workflow?

    "This isn't 2007 anymore... "
    It is and this what we are complaining. Changing ringtones, putting some music in your phone... in 2016? like we were 10 years ago? Really?
  • techconc - Monday, October 17, 2016 - link

    Your complaints seem to be focused on FLAC. For starters, if you insist on using FLAC, you can do so with VLC, etc. It's not a real barrier. For that matter, you ask about alternate workflows. Have you tried something like WALTR? It's a free application that's available on both Mac and Windows. It allows for drag and drop of your media in basically any format, including FLAC. You drag and drop the files onto the application and it does real time conversion (losslessly in the case of FLAC) to a native iOS format in order to work properly with native apps. The point being, even your edge case scenarios have viable solutions.
  • adrift02 - Wednesday, October 12, 2016 - link

    You mentioned UI fluidity in the review, and that none of the recent iPhones are the most fluid mobile devices you've used. So what device tops them? I'm asking because that's why I switched to iOS when the iPhone 5 was released -- I was sick of animation stutters and progressive slowdown among Android devices. I'm now looking to switch back to Android (for audio reasons, as I want a headphone jack and the 7 dongle's DAC wasn't great) but am torn re: choices. I'd like an experience that's as smooth as iOS and am considering the Pixel (waiting for reviews), as well as the V20 (just for the DAC, but it's waaay to big for me).
  • Crono - Thursday, October 13, 2016 - link

    Disable animations in developer options. Install Nova Launcher, enable Aggressive Desktop, select "Faster than light" in animations. On a clean ROM or.a debloated device - I'm using am Honor 8 - it's a less stuttery/faster UI than the iPhone 7 fresh out of the box.
  • Crono - Thursday, October 13, 2016 - link

    ^ please ignore the typos, it was a quick reply and there's no edit feature :(

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now