Storage Optimization

I don't think anyone would say that the move to SSDs in laptops was a step backward, but the transition meant computers that once included a 500GB or 1TB hard drive in the base model now come with a 128GB or perhaps a 256GB SSD. Meanwhile, the amount of data that users keep has continually increased as they take more photos, record more videos, and listen to more music. Streaming content has alleviated storage pressure to some extent, but in the end you simply have less local storage to work with nowadays than in the past.

macOS Sierra brings some new features to help users reduce storage pressure. Some of this has to do with leveraging the cloud for file storage, while other parts are designed to help with cleaning up things on a Mac that can be removed. It's no secret that computers running Windows and macOS both end up accumulating files that the user doesn't want and often doesn't even know exist. Unfortunately, it has never been easy to track all of these files down, which opened up a market for computer cleaner software that is sometimes less than reputable. In macOS Sierra there's now a central area for tracking what is taking up a lot of space on your Mac, along with controls and recommendations on how to free up space.

When you open the new storage management panel in Sierra you'll first see the screen that shows recommendations. Most of these are fairly standard, such as setting the trash to automatically empty itself, removing old mail attachments and iTunes movies, and using optimized photos instead of storing the original full resolution images on your device. There's also an option to reduce clutter by removing old documents stored on the Mac, which opens up a screen that additionally shows you some of the largest files on your Mac, which can be a great way to clear out the largest files that you don't need anymore. In fact, on my test device this feature found several temporary files related to the beta that were over a gigabyte in size each, and I definitely wouldn't have found them by just looking through Finder.

Among all the options to help reduce storage pressure, there's one that stands out. The new Store in iCloud feature claims to store all files and photos in iCloud and keeps only recently utilized files on your local drive. I'm not sure if "all files" is a bit of an exaggeration, but the list of things that it will move to the cloud is quite comprehensive, and it includes files like unused fonts, language packs, unused Mac App Store apps, and many other things that you would never have time to clean off your computer even if you never use them. Most important of all is that this does not count against your iCloud storage. The justification for this is likely that many of these things are actually parts of macOS that can be downloaded on demand, and even in the case of your own files it's not as if they're being synced across your devices so it's not using iCloud in the same way that file syncing does. This means that users who have kept the standard 5GB storage allotment don't need to worry about all the files from their computer suddenly filling up their iCloud Drive.

As someone who uses a 256GB iMac for iOS development, the new Store in iCloud feature in macOS Sierra interests me greatly. Even though I keep my media stored on a NAS, there are still times where there's storage pressure just due to files I'm currently working on and media that I've downloaded locally without having moved it to the NAS yet. At WWDC Apple stated that turning on all the storage optimization options in Sierra brought a 250GB Mac with 20GB free to 150GB free. While I doubt this is typical, and it certainly wasn't just due to moving data to iCloud, even a few extra gigabytes here and there would go a long way to help Mac users with smaller SSDs.

​iCloud Desktop and Documents

A feature separate from optimized storage is iCloud Desktop and Documents. This feature does utilize your iCloud storage, but it also provides a very useful way of syncing files across all your macOS and iOS devices. With this feature enabled all files and folders that are within the Desktop and Documents folders on your Macs will be synced across iCloud. This means that every Mac you use will have the same desktop, and all of your documents. On iOS these can be accessed via the iCloud Drive app, and assuming the format is something that can be handled by a system-level or third-party iOS app you'll be able to open it there as well.

One apparent oversight with iCloud desktop and document syncing is the ability to have a limit on the size of files that will sync. For example, I don't want large video files on my laptop that end up in documents or on the desktop to then be uploaded to iCloud and downloaded to my other Macs. My desktop computers don't store media locally at all because it's all streamed from a NAS, and the laptop only has local media content so it can be accessible when I'm not at home. It would be helpful if Apple provided mechanisms to exclude certain files or folders within the desktop and documents folders from iCloud syncing, as well as some setting that stopped files above a certain size from syncing to iCloud unless you explicitly tell it to.

I'm sure someone within Apple is already aware that this feature needs some configurable options, and by the time macOS Sierra releases later this year I'm sure there will be a solution in place. Beyond that there's not a whole lot else to say about the feature. I've been in a number of situations where I wished I could get at a file on the desktop of my home computer from my work computer, but without SSH or VNC set up there was no way to do so. Having things sync to the cloud on their own means that's never something you have to worry about again, and sometimes the best features are the ones that just give you a bit of peace of mind.

Window Management: Tabs And Picture In Picture Improved Photos and Messages
Comments Locked

81 Comments

View All Comments

  • TheITS - Wednesday, July 13, 2016 - link

    People are complaining because they don't want to see such a brilliant website lose its identity. I don't imagine many people care for a deep dive on the Galaxy S6 now and yet this is the direction the site is taking. Who cares about an in-depth article on a last-gen product when it isn't an unknown quantity anymore?
  • Impulses - Wednesday, July 13, 2016 - link

    Phone reviews, iPhone aside (and even then) were always late tho...

    I remember bugging Anand over email about 1st and 2nd gen Android phone reviews. They might've actually gotten better at some point but it's always been a slow process to produce the kinda reviews they do and they've pretty much never been able to review ALL phones.

    It was way worse when every carrier had specific versions of various phones and basically no phone was available across more than 2 carriers... Samsung didn't start cracking down on that from their end until the SGS3 or so.

    Just saying, the HTC 10 review is still pretty darn late, but it isn't an entirely new trend.
  • tipoo - Wednesday, July 13, 2016 - link


    I'm talking about GPU and CPU reviews, hour 1 has never been their thing, but they often bring to light new architectural features or issues others skipped.
  • fanofanand - Wednesday, July 13, 2016 - link

    This right here encapsulates the frustration. They have lost their way. Instead of in-depth breakdowns of different technologies, we get pages and pages about Apple watches, months spent on an iPad that is 3 inches larger, crap like that. They have completely missed the boat on some of the most in-demand consumer tech products like the 960, the 1070, 1080 etc. They are barely even dribbling content out at this point if it isn't an Apple product.
  • jwcalla - Wednesday, July 13, 2016 - link

    You don't really think Anand got a cushy job at Apple because they liked his hair, do you?
  • Dennis Travis - Wednesday, July 13, 2016 - link

    Anand got the Job at Apple because he knows his stuff. The strange thing is this, I have been here since close to the beginning and the last year before Anand left he was always being run down the same way and called an Apple fan boy, Taking $$$ from manufactures in return for positive reviews, Late reviews.

    Amazing to me as this site and the reviews both with Anand and since he left are FIRST RATE and really help people make the right decision.

    I wish people would back off and not keep attacking everyone here. They are doing their best and the quality of the reviews are worth the wait.
  • KoolAidMan1 - Thursday, July 14, 2016 - link

    Tech forums are filled with butthurt fanboys who only want to read things that reinforce their personal bias. They aren't unique to AT but it is disappointing given the higher caliber of reader you would hope a site like this attracts.
  • xthetenth - Friday, July 15, 2016 - link

    The really funny thing is it was Anand who sold me on windows phone.

    Dat apple bias.
  • ex2bot - Friday, July 15, 2016 - link

    I agree. People who accuse others of corruption or dishonesty should have damn good evidence. If not, then they're being unethical.
  • melgross - Wednesday, July 13, 2016 - link

    Oh, BS. I mean, seriously, if you aren't happy, then just leave.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now