Stock Comparison: Legacy Benchmarks

Some of our legacy benchmarks have followed AnandTech for over a decade, showing how performance changes when the code bases stay the same in that period. Some of this software is still in common use today.

All of our benchmark results can also be found in our benchmark engine, Bench.

3D Particle Movement v1

3DPM is a self-penned benchmark, taking basic 3D movement algorithms used in Brownian Motion simulations and testing them for speed. High floating point performance, MHz and IPC wins in the single thread version, whereas the multithread version has to handle the threads and loves more cores. This is the original version, written in the style of a typical non-computer science student coding up an algorithm for their theoretical problem, and comes without any non-obvious optimizations not already performed by the compiler, such as false sharing.

3D Particle Movement: Single Threaded

3D Particle Movement: MultiThreaded

Despite 3DPM v1's coding issues, the multithreaded result is a lot closer than I had originally expected.

Cinebench 11.5 and 10

Cinebench is a widely known benchmarking tool for measuring performance relative to MAXON's animation software Cinema 4D. Cinebench has been optimized over a decade and focuses on purely CPU horsepower, meaning if there is a discrepancy in pure throughput characteristics, Cinebench is likely to show that discrepancy. Arguably other software doesn't make use of all the tools available, so the real world relevance might purely be academic, but given our large database of data for Cinebench it seems difficult to ignore a small five minute test. We run the modern version 15 in this test, as well as the older 11.5 and 10 due to our back data.

Cinebench 11.5 - Single Threaded

Cinebench 11.5 - Multi-Threaded

Cinebench R10 - Single Threaded Benchmark

Cinebench R10 - Multi-Threaded Benchmark

In both CineBench instances we see the high IPC of the Pentium take a 33-50% lead, whereas moving to multi-threaded puts the X4 845 firmly in the driving seat.

POV-Ray 3.7

POV-Ray is a common ray-tracing tool used to generate realistic looking scenes. We've used POV-Ray in its various guises over the years as a good benchmark for performance, as well as a tool on the march to ray-tracing limited immersive environments. We use the built-in multithreaded benchmark.

POV-Ray 3.7 Beta RC4

POV-Ray fully exploints all the threads in the system, and the latest AMD microarchitecture helps here as well, pushing the X4 845 beyond the other AMD CPUs in this test and comfortably over the Pentium and low-power Core i3 parts.

TrueCrypt 7.1

Before its discontinuation, TrueCrypt was a popular tool for WindowsXP to offer software encryption to a file system. The almost latest version, 7.1, is still widely used however the developers have stopped supporting it since the introduction of encrypted disk support in Windows 8/7/Vista from 5/2014, and as such any new security issues are unfixed.

TrueCrypt 7.1 Benchmark (AES Performance)

The Pentium lacks AES acceleration, which is available on Core i3 parts and up, which explains the Pentium's low performance here. The Carrizo microarchitecture pushes the 65W part ahead of all the other 95W/100W/125W parts.

x264 HD 3.0

Similarly, the x264 HD 3.0 package we use here is also kept for historic regressional data. The latest version is 5.0.1, and encodes a 1080p video clip into a high quality x264 file. Version 3.0 only performs the same test on a 720p file, and in most circumstances the software performance hits its limit on high end processors, but still works well for mainstream and low-end. Also, this version only takes a few minutes, whereas the latest can take over 90 minutes to run.

x264 HD Benchmark - 1st pass - v3.03

x264 HD Benchmark - 2nd pass - v3.03

7-zip

7-Zip is a freeware compression/decompression tool that is widely deployed across the world. We run the included benchmark tool using a 50MB library and take the average of a set of fixed-time results.

7-zip Benchmark

Stock Comparison: Linux Gaming Comparison: Alien Isolation
Comments Locked

131 Comments

View All Comments

  • wiboonsin - Thursday, May 25, 2017 - link

    Always so interesting to visit your site.What a great info, thank you for sharing. this will help me so much in my learning Scarpe Nike Lunarglide 8 Flash http://www.scarperun.com/nike-lunarglide-8-c-1_75....
  • Lolimaster - Saturday, July 16, 2016 - link

    They really shoot themselves up allowing those 15w TDP configs with their "high end" APU's.
  • Lolimaster - Saturday, July 16, 2016 - link

    That was my point about AMD building their own mobile ecosystem instead of letting OEM's destroy their reputation even more with cr*aptastic offerings.
  • wiboonsin - Thursday, May 25, 2017 - link

    This <a href="http://www.scarperun.com/nike-lunarglide-8-c-1_75.... Nike Lunarglide 8 Flash</a> is written very well. Your use of formatting when making your points makes your observations very clear and easy to understand. Thank you.
  • wiboonsin - Thursday, May 25, 2017 - link

    Your blogs are easily accessible and quite enlightening Scarpe Nike Air Huarache Run Ultra http://www.scarperun.com/nike-air-huarache-c-1_9.h... so keep doing the amazing work guys.
  • wiboonsin - Monday, July 10, 2017 - link

    Great Article it its really informative and innovative keep us posted with new updates. Nike Free 5.0 Flyknit Shoes http://www.dicksrunningshop.com/nike-free-50-flykn... was really valuable. thanks a lot.
  • wiboonsin - Friday, November 17, 2017 - link

    I learn some new stuff from it too, thanks for sharing your information http://www.zapatosports.com/
  • albert89 - Thursday, July 14, 2016 - link

    Well better late than never for Andantech, but still a great review. As for AMD's Zen, there is much to celebrate and everything they have learned from Kaveri & Carrizo will be put into Zen. But most importantly is AMD's move to 14nm. Which means most reviewers will, for the first time, be comparing apples with apples. Its been a long road for AMD but now that they are here, I can only expect that in many areas of computing they'll give Intel a run for their money and the consumer a taste of the benefits of competition.
  • osxandwindows - Thursday, July 14, 2016 - link

    Yeah, right.
    Keep dreaming.
    Hehe.
  • euskalzabe - Thursday, July 14, 2016 - link

    I'd say the most important part isn't the move to 14nm - that would've happened anyway at this point in time - but the abandonment of the Bulldozer design, finally, into a new CPU microarchitecture and adoption of Intel-like hyperthreading. That's what will shoot AMD CPUs back into competition.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now