Last year we saw the launch of Intel’s latest mainstream processors using the Skylake microarchitecture, and we’re still a few months away from the Kaby Lake update to the platform with 200-series motherboards. On the high-end desktop side, Intel has very recently launched the Broadwell-E line of CPUs, including the 10-core Core i7-6950X at $1723 (read our review here); however this new line of CPUs uses the LGA2011-v3 socket similar to the previous generation of Haswell-E processors. Keeping the same socket for two generations has been a long-term Intel strategy, so no surprises there. This means that the chipsets also stay the same, and we stay on the X99 chipset for a second generation. Normally in this instance we see the motherboard manufacturers release updated models on the same chipset, adjusting the style and feature-set depending on the market. The key points for the refresh models across all the manufacturers so far has been the increased adoption of U.2 ports, but as ASUS is in the middle of their 10 Year ROG anniversary, to celebrate the occasion they have released a special version of the high-end Rampage V Extreme (RVE) motherboard, normally a $500 model which reviewed earlier this year, into a Rampage V Edition-10 for $600. There’s also a nod to the RGB LED craze that seems to be sweeping the gaming motherboard line, in new models such as the Strix X99 Gaming.

The ASUS Rampage V Edition 10

If we cycle back to the launch of Sandy Bridge-E, and the X79 chipset, the best-selling motherboard of that generation was the ASUS X79 Rampage IV Extreme: a high-cost motherboard that ultimately focused on overclocking and gaming. It was part of a trio of X79 Rampage motherboards, which also included the gaming-focused Rampage IV Formula and the micro-ATX Rampage IV Gene. We reviewed all three in a big ROG article when they were launched, and ASUS has tried to match this success with the X99 platform and the Rampage V Extreme. Similar to how the Rampage IV Extreme had a refresh model, the Rampage IV Black Edition, the RVE gets one for the 10-year anniversary.


Click the image for the full resolution

The most obvious change to the Rampage V Edition 10 is the PCIe slots. Instead of lighting up an LED beside the PCIe slot that needs the graphics card, ASUS has moved to a semi-transparent PCIe latch with an LED underneath that uses a microcontroller for various lighting effects. There are going to be a number of motherboards with this coming in the near future, but the blue lighting here is for the Edition 10.

Compared to the original RVE, the black design is reminiscent of the Rampage IV Black Edition, but there are also a few more updates. ASUS removed the SATA Express ports in the SATA area, and replaced them with a U.2 port that supports PCIe 3.0 x4 drives, like Intel’s SSD 750. The rear panel protector, designed to enhance the aesthetic, is now placed down the side of the motherboard covering most of the audio pathways, although a few filter caps are moved to outside the guard.

Also on the list is the middle PCIe 3.0 x4 slot, which on the original RVE was a full length PCIe 3.0 x4 slot, but here is reduced to an open ended PCIe 3.0 x4 slot. I suspect there will be a few more changes, particularly with Broadwell-E, such as the addition of a second 4-pin DIP switch system on the top right of the board, however if we get the board in to test we’ll go in deeper.

The Rampage V Edition 10 is already on sale, coming in at $600.

ASUS Strix X99 Gaming

The Strix brand at ASUS is having an interesting time. It was originally released on certain graphics cards to signify silent operation, and use the eagle eyes logo to come across as ‘silent but deadly’. Since then, the Strix name has been moved from low-noise to a general ‘value’ proposition model line, pitching behind some of the more well-known ASUS brands. In this case, Strix is meant to signify a fully featured but slightly different to ROG gaming brand with a lot of features but not necessarily ROG branded. I would assume that means that Strix gets a different software package, which might reduce the cost over ROG.


Click the image for the full resolution

The Strix board as shown above looks like a hefty X99 motherboard, using a full array of DIMMs, support for three proper graphics cards, a rear IO/audio combination plate, both SATA Express and U.2 support and multiple fan headers. If only faintly, you can also tell that this model also has the transparent PCIe slot latches similar to the Edition 10, this time in a red/orange color.

The Strix is aimed at 2/3-way high-end desktop systems, and will offer full ‘Aura’ RGB illumination with a separate RGB strip header for a bundled RGB strip to be used with software. It will have a few gaming tools similar to ROG, including Sonic Radar II. The Strix X99 Gaming current retails for around $340.

Monitors: A 240 Hz Monitor, and a 100 Hz G-Sync 21:9 Display Chassis: Project Avalon
Comments Locked

43 Comments

View All Comments

  • Ian Cutress - Thursday, June 23, 2016 - link

    It's an MSword issue when you (sometimes) insert a hyperlink. Should be fixed.
  • Soundgardener - Sunday, June 26, 2016 - link

    No; it's a technical publication issue when you forego proof-readers / copyeditors. Other examples:

    we waited until the following day and was able to browse the ASUS ROG Booth (we WERE not we was)

    and they seem willing to be prepared to pay for it (willing / prepared: pick one, delete the other ;)

    Other features such as color accuracy are also lauded by the professional community as well. (also / as well: again, only one needed...)

    better color reproducibility (better colour reproduction, better colour gamut, or better colour...)
  • alphasquadron - Wednesday, June 22, 2016 - link

    For the 240hz monitor, a good way to tell if the human eye cannot tell a difference is to test it out with professional gamers (preferably fast twitch shooters). They should be able to tell you if there is a difference or do a blind test with them. I won't listen to any more regular idiots who for the previous generation said the eye cannot tell the difference between 60hz and 120hz.
  • Lolimaster - Wednesday, June 22, 2016 - link

    The main difference people should be noticing is not about "gaming" but the thing that it reduces further more the innate flaw of the LCD/OLED sample and hold way of delivering frames vs the constantly refresh nature of CRT.

    OLED should starting to be called true CRT successor when every panel goes at 240Hz.
  • alphasquadron - Wednesday, June 22, 2016 - link

    Thought anything over a 100hz had a better refresh rate than CRTs, but then again not sure.
  • Lolimaster - Wednesday, June 22, 2016 - link

    Frame time (sample and hold tech):

    60hz 16.66ms
    120hz 8.33ms
    240Hz 4.16ms

    Technically you'll need about 960Hz on LCD's to achieve CRT levels of smoothness (lightboost is pretty close).
  • alphasquadron - Wednesday, June 22, 2016 - link

    That sucks because I don't see us reaching hardware to drive 960Hz anytime soon. We just got the hardware to drive 144hz at 1080p smoothly.
  • Gastec - Wednesday, August 31, 2016 - link

    Considering that LCD monitors entered "mainstream" in 2003-2004 and that good quality 144Hz+ monitors of all resolutions are still prohibitively expensive for the average Joe, I would make a quick estimate that 960 Hz and it's driving hardware would theoretically reach our mortal realms in about 160 years.
  • Midwayman - Thursday, June 23, 2016 - link

    There are studies to say that 240hz should be usable. However there are two things. Imagine persistence is more important and they didn't explicitly state ULMB support or what refresh range it works at. Second is there is really a point of diminishing returns for refresh anyways. With a 144hz monitor the difference between 60hz and 100hz is readily apparent. Going from 100 to 144hz less so. I imagine the jump to 240hz even less important.
  • Bragabondio - Wednesday, June 22, 2016 - link

    Can anybody explain me why for God's sake there millions of updated LGA 2011-v3 motherboards but only in ATX size!?! I was patiently waiting to build a new Broadwell E PC with micro ATX or even mini ITX board and there is not a single micro ATX that has all the new features of their big brother (some don't have USB 3.1 other have the M.2 in the older PCI 2 format - not much faster than the SATA 3 etc.) Even going for z170 ( can't believe I will be upgrading to 4 core CPU after 6 years of 4 core CPU - core i7 870!) and there are just a few micro ATX z170 boards with all the new features.
    I am not going back to gigantic ATX case - thank you very much, so I am left with the choice of either not upgrading (I gave my old PC to my mom so currently I use MS Surface pro with a dock that works well for office work not so much for gaming) , wait for ZEN, buy a laptop that supports external video card dock (laptop + dock would probably take the same space and would have zero upgradability - except for the video card) or cave up and get core i7 6700k.
    So I don't understand why manufacturers don't want my money?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now