Samsung this week said that it had begun mass production of its first SSDs in BGA form-factor. The PM971-NVMe tiny drive weighs about one gram, can store up to 512 GB of data and offers up to 1500 MB/s read speed. The SSDs will be used inside 2-in-1 hybrid computers, high-end tablets as well as ultra-thin notebooks later this year.

Samsung demonstrated its first BGA SSD earlier in 2016 and most of its specifications are generally known. The PM971 is based on up to 16 Samsung’s second-generation 48-layer MLC V-NAND. The SSD relies on Samsung's proprietary controller called Photon, which can extract high performance from a limited number of NAND channels and ICs thanks to architecture as well as the company’s proprietary TurboWrite technology. The PM971-NVMe SSD is equipped with a 512 MB LPDDR4 buffer, uses a PCIe 3.0 x2 interface and supports NVMe.

Samsung will ship three versions of its PM971-NVMe BGA SSDs with 128 GB, 256 GB, and 512 GB capacities, which will be enough for modern convertibles, tablets and ultra-thin laptops. Dimensions of the PM971-NVMe are 20 mm × 16 mm × 1.5 mm and the weight is just about a gram. Judging by the physical sizes of the package, it seems that the new PM971-NVMe BGA SSDs from Samsung comply with mechanical specifications for BGA SSDs proposed by multiple companies to JEDEC last year. In any case, the key message here is that Samsung’s BGA SSDs are significantly smaller than the smallest M.2 modules and can thus save space inside SFF PCs to make them either thinner, or prolong their battery life.

Brief Specifications of Samsung BGA SSDs
  PM971-NVMe
Capacity 128 GB
256 GB
512 GB
Form Factor BGA
20 mm × 16 mm × 1.5 mm
Controller Samsung Photon
Interface PCIe 3.0 x2
Protocol NVMe
DRAM 512 MB
NAND Samsung's 48-layer MLC V-NAND
Sequential Read 1500 MB/s
Sequential Write 900 MB/s with TurboWrite
4KB Random Read (QD32) 190K IOPS
4KB Random Write (QD32) 150K IOPS

The PM971-NVMe SSD supports sequential read speed of up to 1500 MB/s as well as sequential write speed of up to 900 MB/s when the TurboWrite technology is enabled (earlier this year the company mentioned 600 MB/s write speed, but did not mention the TurboWrite). Samsung’s TurboWrite technology uses a portion of SSD’s NAND memory in pseudo-SLC mode, which significantly improves writing performance of the drive. Typically, Samsung uses its TurboWrite for its TLC NAND-based drives, which makes the PM971-NVMe the company’s first MLC-based SSD with a pseudo-SLC buffer. At this point we are not sure how exactly Samsung’s TurboWrite works in the PM971-NVMe and whether it speeds up or optimizes anything else apart from writing performance (since it is actually easier to read from SLC cells, the pSLC buffer can also help to improve read performance and even reduce power consumption). As for random performance, the PM971-NVMe SSD can perform 190K random read IOPS as well as up to 150K random write IOPS, according to Samsung.

Since the PM971-NVMe BGA SSDs are not designed for end-users, but for large PC suppliers as well as their OEMs/ODMs, Samsung does not disclose their prices. Right now, the company says that the it would start providing the new SSDs to its customers “this month”, which is not really relevant because the announcement was made on May 31. However, keep in mind that memory companies usually do not announce mass production until they have quantities of finished products ready to deliver to customers. Therefore, the PM971-NVMe drives may show up in actual devices sooner than one might think.

Source: Samsung

POST A COMMENT

40 Comments

View All Comments

  • owan - Wednesday, June 1, 2016 - link

    Would still have issues with z-height, which is critical for tablets/2-in-1's/ultrabooks etc.... which is the real target market. You will still have plenty of chances for user-replaceable NVME drives in m.2 form. This is not a replacement for those, but a new solution to a different problem.... though it likely means that user upgradeability will suffer in form factors that are already so unfriendly to upgrade that it barely matters. Reply
  • stephenbrooks - Wednesday, June 1, 2016 - link

    M.2 22x30 isn't bad I guess. I also notice some of the ZIF sockets (where a flexible tape of contacts is clamped to the corresponding contacts) used to connect things to motherboards are very compact, but still replaceable by a human being. It would be good to have this sort of smallness but not sacrifice replaceability. I don't think you'll ever beat soldered BGA on size though. Reply
  • Exodite - Wednesday, June 1, 2016 - link

    I would like to see this in my next phone, though I assume the power consumption and/or physical footprint makes it unsuitable.

    I'd be happy going to a 5.5" phone if that's what it takes though.
    Reply
  • creed3020 - Wednesday, June 1, 2016 - link

    At least for me this is the first new interesting product in SSDs for a long time. Kudos to Samsung to pushing the envelope of whats possible. Cannot wait to see the trickle down effect of this type of product. Reply
  • AnotherGuy - Wednesday, June 1, 2016 - link

    True that! Reply
  • vladx - Wednesday, June 1, 2016 - link

    Surface 5 will get this most likely. Reply
  • brucek2 - Wednesday, June 1, 2016 - link

    This feels like an important development to me. Any idea how the cost to OEM compares to their other choices for storage solutions? (i.e., is this a premium items only deal or is it headed for mass market gear over the next few years?) Reply
  • vladx - Wednesday, June 1, 2016 - link

    Sadly it's 100% for premium devices, eMMC will still be used for mainstream tablets and phones for a long time. Reply
  • tuxRoller - Thursday, June 2, 2016 - link

    I know it's still big but this COULD still fit into a smartphone. Potentially this could lead to better battery life (obviously it would let you page out without ux tanking so much,allow mobile OSs to be less stingy when it comes to io access thus allowing for a richer experience,etc) along with a much snappier overall experience.
    The big question is: what's the peak current this thing needs?
    Reply
  • AnnonymousCoward - Saturday, June 11, 2016 - link

    They should also make a 128GB version while they're at it, and destroy the low-end HDD market. Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now