Roughly a year and a half ago, NVIDIA opened up a patent infringement case against Samsung and Qualcomm, claiming that the various GPUs used by the two firms violated various NVIDIA patents. In response, Samsung opened up their own counter-suit, claiming that NVIIDA and its partners were violating Samsung patents. Since then, things have not progressed well for NVIDIA, with the US International Trade Commission (ITC) ruling that Samsung’s GPUs don’t infringe on NVIDIA’s patents, while also ruling that NVIDIA’s GPUs did infringe on Samsung’s patents.

Now with the final ruling on Samsung’s counter-suit originally scheduled for today, NVIDIA has announced that they have buried the hatchet with Samsung, ending all litigation between the companies. In their announcement, NVIDIA notes that both companies have ended their suits with the US courts, US ITC, and the US Patent office, effective immediately. In turn, both companies have agreed to cross-license “a small number of patents by each company to the other,” while noting that this is not a broad cross-licensing agreement. All other terms of the deal – such as any potential payments – are not being disclosed.

As noted by Bloomberg, NVIDIA faced a potential import ban on some of their products should they have lost the final ruling on the Samsung counter-suit, so combined with their earlier losses at the ITC, there was a clear need for NVIDIA to settle the case rather than waiting on ITC and court rulings. This, in turn, seemingly puts a wrench in NVIDIA’s overall mobile patent licensing efforts, as the Samsung case was their best opportunity to get a ruling that other mobile GPUs were violating their patents. That there is some cross-licensing going on between Samsung and NVIDIA does mean that NVIDIA holds at least some patents that Samsung believes they need, but that this is being settled quietly out of court means that it’s hard to imagine that NVIDIA has a strong position for further patent licensing efforts.

Source: NVIDIA

POST A COMMENT

37 Comments

View All Comments

  • Mondozai - Wednesday, May 4, 2016 - link

    20% of all replies in this thread is from you, all of them furiously defending NV like a fanboy.

    As Testbug00 wrote below, AMD doesn't resort to these patent-troll tactics that NV often does.
    Reply
  • Michael Bay - Wednesday, May 4, 2016 - link

    Spoken like a rabid AMD fanboy, congratulations. Reply
  • TheJian - Wednesday, February 8, 2017 - link

    https://pipedot.org/article/2BF9W
    Just thought a year later interesting to update your "amd doesn't resort to these patent-troll tactics that NV often does". Umm..They just did, and BTW that was NV's 1ST suit filed by them. Any previous NV attempts have only been in response to someone else (like Intel breaking their agreement over chipsets).
    Reply
  • JoeMonco - Tuesday, May 3, 2016 - link

    Couldn't bother reading the whole article? The only outcome was a narrow-focused, cross-licensig deal and nothing more. Reply
  • Yojimbo - Tuesday, May 3, 2016 - link

    Yes, that was the outcome. The outcome is not known beforehand. Think a little. Reply
  • webdoctors - Tuesday, May 3, 2016 - link

    It doesn't sound like this will stop future lawsuits. This was only a settlement of <10 patents in question. Both companies have 1000+ patents. The real winners will be known if we see NV licensing happening or Mali or QCOM GPUs growing in complexity without any IP payments. Reply
  • Vlad_Da_Great - Tuesday, May 3, 2016 - link

    SAMS gave'em an easy pass. I am sure NVDA said, lets settle. NVDA are suing QCom again in EU. Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now