Seagate has started volume shipments of its first helium-filled hard drives. They were announced earlier this year. The new HDDs are available to all interested parties, which means that Seagate’s biggest customers have already evaluated and validated them. Volume shipments of the 8 TB and 10 TB helium-filled hard drives will help Seagate to improve its financial results and margins, since the new HDDs will be amongst the most expensive drives in the company’s lineup.

Brand New Platform

The Seagate Enterprise Capacity 3.5 helium-filled hard drive is based on the company’s brand-new hermetically-sealed platform featuring fourteen heads and seven perpendicular magnetic recording (PMR) platters with up to 1.43 TB capacity each. Seagate claims that the new HDD platform is based on a special wide-weld hermetically sealed drive enclosure with a design based on a multi-step forging process. Besides that, it uses a motor attached to both top and bottom covers, in order to better handle vibrations and maximize reliability. Sensors for humidity, temperature and helium pressure ensure that the helium-filled drive is always being monitored for reliable operation.

Seagate has incorporated PowerChoice and PowerBalance technologies in the new drives. PowerChoice helps datacenter operators to manage power consumption during idle time by either reducing spindle speed, or even stopping disks completely, after an admin-defined interval of idle time. Meanwhile, PowerBalance technology helps the administrators to balance the power consumption and IOPS (input/output operations per second) performance of hard drives prior to installation.

The Enterprise Capacity 3.5" helium hard drive sports a 256 MB multi-segmented cache. The platters rotate at 7200 revolutions per minute (RPM). The host interface is SATA 3.2 (6 Gbps), and supports hot-plugging.

Seagate claims that its multi-segmented cache helps the Enterprise Capacity 3.5 (Helium) HDD to improve performance compared to its predecessors and rivals and enables burst transfer rates at up to 600 MB/s (for small chunks of data, of course). The company does not reveal many details about its new caching algorithms, but 256 MB of memory is still a rather huge buffer.

Lineup and Performance Numbers

Seagate will offer multiple versions of its Enterprise Capacity 3.5" Helium HDDs, including models with 8 TB capacity, 4K and 512e sectors as well as self-encrypting (SED) options.

Lineup of Seagate's Enterprise Capacity 3.5" Helium HDDs with SATA Interface
  Standard 4KN Standard 512e Self-Encrypting 4KN (SED) Self-Encrypting 512e (SED)
10 TB Capacity ST10000NM0006 ST10000NM0016  ST10000NM0056 ST10000NM0046
8 TB Capacity ST8000NM0006  ST8000NM0016 ST8000NM0056 ST8000NM0046

Seagate declares fairly high performance numbers for its Enterprise Capacity 3.5" Helium HDDs: 243 or 254 MB/s maximum sustained transfer rate as well as 4.16 ms average latency, which is higher than the numbers listed by competing drives from HGST and Western Digital.

Comparison of Helium-Filled HDDs
  Seagate Enterpise Capacity
ST10000NM0006
HGST Ultrastar He10
HUH721010ALE600xxxx
WD Gold
WD8002FRYZ
Capacity 10 TB 8 TB
RPM 7200 RPM
Interface SATA 6 Gbps
DRAM Cache 256 MB 128 MB
Maximum Sustained Transfer Rate 243 MB/s
254 MB/s
225 MB/s
249 MB/s
205 MB/s
Average Latency 4.16 ms unknown
Rated Workload (Drive Writes Per Day) 0.189 unknown 0.189
Equivalent of 550 TB of Writes per Year unknown Equivalent of 550 TB of Writes per Year
Acoustics Idle 28 - 30 dBA 20 - 36 dBA 20 dBA
Seek 32 - 34 dBA unknown 36 dBA
Power Rating Idle 4.5 W 5 W 5.10 W
Random Write 6.5 W 6.8 W 7.4 W
Random Read 8.5W 6.8 W 7.4 W
MTBF 2.5 million hours
Warranty 5 Years
Price $695 at Amazon unknown $629

Usage of helium inside a hard drive helps to reduce the drag force acting on the spinning disk stack and lower the fluid flow forces affecting the disks and the heads. As a result, HDD makers can install up to seven platters into a standard drive and also use lower-power motors and mechanics. This reduces the power consumption of the HDDs. For example, power consumption of Seagate’s 10 TB hard drive is actually lower than power consumption of the company’s 8 TB drive for nearline applications (8.5 W per drive vs. 10.4 W per drive).

For cloud datacenters, power consumption of HDDs is as important as their capacity. Increasing the capacity of the top-of-the-range hard drives from 8 TB to 10 TB automatically boosts total capacity per rack by 25% (which means an increase from 1920 TB to 2400 TB per standard rack that holds 240 drives). Going helium additionally reduces the power consumption of such a rack by up to 456 W. An increase of storage capacity amid reduction of power consumption not only maximizes data storage capacities of a particular facility, but also shrinks its total cost of ownership (TCO), an important metric for companies with multiple large datacenters.

Broad Availability, But No SAS Models Yet

It should be noted that when Seagate introduced its Enterprise Capacity 3.5" 10 TB HDD in January, the company announced models with Serial ATA 6 Gb/s and SAS 12 Gb/s interfaces, which were aimed at different environments. At present, Seagate only ships models with SATA interfaces, meaning that customers, who need SAS, may still be evaluating SAS drives, which will come to market later. By contrast, HGST offers different models of its 10 TB HDDs: with SATA and SAS interfaces.

While Seagate said that its 10 TB helium-filled HDDs are available from its distributors worldwide, it did not reveal their actual prices. Amazon currently sells the Seagate Enterprise Capacity 3.5" HDD 10TB (ST10000NM0016) for $695.98 (note that this is not an MSRP), which is far from affordable. Still, keep in mind that we talking about exclusive products based on a brand-new platform. Such HDDs make a lot of sense for datacenters, but, currently, not so much for desktops or NAS units.

Source: Seagate

POST A COMMENT

65 Comments

View All Comments

  • cygnus1 - Thursday, April 28, 2016 - link

    it's also not sold by amazon. it's a 3rd party selling through amazon marketplace, not the same thing. the more accurate way to write the story is that the drive is available on amazon, not sold by amazon. Reply
  • bill.rookard - Thursday, April 28, 2016 - link

    Dang, I just pulled the trigger on 3x4TB Seagate ES drives. Cost me about $450, and in RAID5, it's 8TB usable. Only problem with a single drive is no failure protection, so you'd need two of them, and that would run almost $1400.00.

    Too much $. When they come down into the $300 range they'll be well worth it.
    Reply
  • beginner99 - Friday, April 29, 2016 - link

    RAID5 with 4 TB drives isn't really a good idea however. Changes the rebuild will fail as well are pretty huge. Reply
  • bill.rookard - Friday, April 29, 2016 - link

    Everyone always says that. I have a RAID5 5x2TB set which has had no problems in spite of a rebuild a few months into having the array (about 4-5 years ago). These are also WD Green drives, yet have had no problem except for the original first failure. Is it a critical array? Nope, just my media server. If I lost the whole thing it wouldn't be that big of a deal.

    In a critical business setting, I'd be using RAID1 x2 (twin RAID1 mirrors sync'd daily).
    Reply
  • darkfalz - Thursday, April 28, 2016 - link

    Call me when the consumer/expansion 8TB and 10TB drives are available (and please, that ugly new checkerboard design for the expansion housings - get rid of it). Reply
  • Michael Bay - Friday, April 29, 2016 - link

    Consumer 8Tb is available right now. I`ve got one, aiming for one more. Reply
  • Pneumothorax - Friday, April 29, 2016 - link

    Just bought 2x$250 WD 'My Book 8TB' drives with HGST 7200 8TB drives. These drives rock, much faster, quieter, and cooler than the 4TB Seagates they replaced.
    He is the best thing that happened to HDD since PMR....
    Reply
  • MrSpadge - Friday, April 29, 2016 - link

    "Average Latency 4.16 ms"
    That's simply half a platter turn at 7200 rpm, so it applies to any 7.2k rpm drive (WD Gold) but says nothing about how quickly the heads move - which determines real world random performance, together with the firmware.

    "... 243 or 254 MB/s maximum sustained transfer rate as well as 4.16 ms average latency, which is higher than the numbers listed by competing drives"
    Glad the latency is higher.. oh wait ;)

    "idle noise of the He10: 20 - 36 dBA"
    No way it's such a huge span. 36 dBA is surely the rating under load.

    "PowerChoice helps datacenter operators ... by ... even stopping disks completely, after an admin-defined interval of idle time"
    Wow, what huge amounts of energy could we have saved if we had implemented such a setting into the BIOS back in the 80's, and later on into the OS. Oh wait again.. :p
    Reply
  • Gunbuster - Friday, April 29, 2016 - link

    "PowerBalance technology helps the administrators to balance the power consumption and IOPS"

    Curious what the settings are labeled? IOPS: Bad, IOPS: Worse?

    It must be pretty degrading being a HDD engineer these days when all your market cares about is capacity and power. But I guess when a $40 Kingston SSD whips you by an order of magnitude you cant do much.
    Reply
  • samer1970 - Saturday, April 30, 2016 - link

    I dont get it ,

    for a $700 harddisk why dont they just increase the cache up to 4G of cache ? we pay $20 only RETAIL PRICE for 4 G DDR4 today , and they still use 256 MB ONLY cache ? and demand 700$ for this drive ? it will only cost them 5$ more per drive ...

    who cares about small chunks of data when the memory is dirt cheap today ? add those 4GB or even 8 GB of cache , and add capacitors to the drive in case of power loss to write that cache to the harddisk while the pc is offline . SIMPLE
    Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now