At the top of the review, I stated that reviewing a server or workstation motherboard is different to a consumer motherboard review. The focus is often very different, meaning that stability and function take precedence over style and user experience. In most cases it has to work without failing and be quick to repair when things go wrong. With all that being said, the MW31-SP0 is a very odd motherboard indeed.

Recap on C232 and C236

However, a brief recap of how the new Skylake Xeon platform will work. From Skylake onwards, Xeon E3-1200 v5 series processors will only work on motherboards equipped with a server chipset, either a C232 or C236. Previously E3-1200 series processors could be paired with a consumer chipset, but not anymore. The two server chipsets will also support consumer processors as well as Xeons, opening that option, but users who typically pair an E3-1230 type processor with a Z- or H- series motherboard can no longer do so. As a result, as well as the normal server motherboard manufacturers, several of the standard consumer motherboard manufacturers have built C232 and C236 motherboards as well. The C232 chipset is akin to the B150, while the C236 is more like the Q170.

Skylake Chipsets
  C236 C232   Q170 B150
Supports Intel Core CPUs Yes Yes   Yes Yes
Supports Intel Xeon E5-1200 v5 CPUs Yes Yes   No No
SLI Possible Yes No   Yes No
Chipset PCIe 3.0 Lanes for HSIO 20 8   20 8
USB 3.0 Ports 10 6   10 6
USB 2.0 Ports 4 6   14 12
SATA 6 Gbps Ports 8 6   6 6
M.2 PCIe Support in RST Yes No   3 No
vPro Support Yes No   Yes No
Intel SIPP Yes ?   Yes No
Intel Small Business Advantage Yes ?   Yes Yes
TDP 6 W 6 W   6 W 6 W
Recommended Price $49 $34   $47 $28
 

GIGABYTE Server MW31-SP0 Conclusion

There are a few main ‘draw’ features to this motherboard. It uses a PLX8747 switch to enable two PCIe 3.0 x16 lanes at full bandwidth to each other, rather than an x8/x8 arrangement which we see on other dual-GPU Skylake based motherboards. These slots are also SLI certified, which is only present on a two or three Skylake Xeon motherboards total at this point. We’ve heard from some manufacturers that SLI on E3-1200 v5 is not a highly requested feature.

Another draw is the mezzanine card slot supported with PCIe 3.0 x4 of bandwidth. This is essentially a PCIe slot using a connector, but allows the motherboard to be bundled with a pair of additional copper or fiber network ports that are on the rear panel rather than through a PCIe card. For 1U systems that will use PCIe ribbons for the PCIe accelerators, this enables faster networking in smaller form factors.

The other element is the legacy connections. The MW31-SP0 motherboard supports two serial ports and two PCI ports for compatibility with older hardware. This all comes down to old machinery that communicates through PCI cards – it’s cheaper to buy a new PC than to replace a seven-figure machine. One example I like to give on this is a custom modding/tuning vehicle workshop I visited several years ago, carving massive aluminum blocks for new parts. They all ran on Firewire, of all things, but the machinery was still perfect for the job. The other element is back in academia, where custom PCI cards for specialist hardware can still be a thing. I had to upgrade those machines once in my old research group. All good fun…

Despite the draws, there are numerous flaws. On the hardware side, there’s no control chip for easily accessing the system from an external device to debug issues, but also no two-digit debug or power/reset buttons to make things easy. Performance for a Skylake system is also bargain basement, with medium-to-high power consumption, long POST times, mediocre audio through the ALC887 codec and high DPC Latency. The system doesn’t care much for user experience, relying on the old hand of an experienced user: there’s no option to control fan speeds for example, and the BIOS is limited.

Everything else to mention about this motherboard is price related. The asking price for a single unit through Newegg is high: $370. About $100 of that will come from the PLX chip used, but even at $270 it’s still a lot to ask. There’s no USB 3.1, no Thunderbolt, no software, no easy debugging, no easy BIOS updating, and even at that price there’s no mezzanine card by default. Without knowing there was a PLX chip, I was thinking this was a $130-$150 motherboard at most, or something cheaper than the MSI Z170A SLI PLUS which is sort of similarly equipped in hardware but better presented and comes with more extras. That being said, corporate clients buying in bulk won’t be paying the single board price, but I don’t have access to package deal pricing.

To top it all off, GIGABYTE’s Server division has one central problem with this motherboard, and it comes from a few floors above the server team back at GIGABYTE HQ: the main motherboard division now sells the SLI-capable GIGABYTE X170-Extreme ECC. This motherboard retails at $310, which is $60 cheaper. While it doesn’t have a PLX8747 chip, a custom mezzanine port or PCI slots, it is better equipped for almost everything with Thunderbolt 3, USB 3.1, a full software package and a BIOS that actually allows for fan control. For what it’s worth, we recently got the X170-Extreme ECC in for review. 

Other 100-Series and C232/C236 Motherboard Reviews:
Prices Correct at time of each review

($500The GIGABYTE Z170X-Gaming G1 Review
($500The ASUS Maximus VIII Extreme Review
($370) The GIGABYTE MW31-SP0 Review (this review)
($250The ASUS Maximus VIII Impact Review
($240The ASRock Z170 Extreme7+ Review
($230The MSI Z170 Gaming M7 Review
($208The GIGABYTE Z170-UD5 TH Review
($165The ASUS Z170-A Review
($130The MSI Z170A SLI PLUS Review
($125The Supermicro C7H170-M Review

Gaming Performance 2015
Comments Locked

28 Comments

View All Comments

  • Samus - Friday, April 22, 2016 - link

    Ahh DFI, they sealed their fate in the consumer market with the Lanparty line, probably the most unreliable mainstream motherboards ever. It's hard to believe the same company made the legendary Infinity motherboards. Hopefully Supermicro doesn't do the same as they begin to enter the mainstream desktop board market...
  • jabber - Friday, April 22, 2016 - link

    Hmmm not how I remember it at the time. Basically if you didn't have a 939 DFI SLi board in your system you just weren't serious. My 939 Lanparty board gave superb service for several years with a Opteron 180, 2GB DDR500, 2 x 7900GTX and a Raptor. Sure they were quirky to configure to get the best out of them but I don't remember them being unreliable, even as a Lanparty Forum member. Still it was 10 years ago.
  • Samus - Friday, April 22, 2016 - link

    Depends which board you had. If you remember, the short lived nForce chipset through its 430 and 460 incarnations gave DFI a bad rap for reliability. The boards worked fine until they didn't. Most of the reviews were great initially until 2-3 years went by and the boards all started failing. It wasn't a DFI issue but DFI no doubt made more nForce boards than anybody for overclocking and the long term reliability of those chipset was terrible.

    The nForce4 goes down in history as one of the highest performing yet most unstable platforms ever. God forbid you actually loaded the nVidia disk controller drivers instead of using the Microsoft default. Except perhaps the Intel 815e and VIA southbridges, those were pretty terrible too.

    Some chipsets get a bad rap for no reason though, even recalled ones like the Intel P67. I still have the early non-Ivy Bridge compatible version on an Intel board no less and it's been stable in my HTPC for 5 years running daily...it must have 50,000 hours on it by now.
  • DanNeely - Friday, April 22, 2016 - link

    Everyone's NF4 boards died like crazy though. That doesn't explain why some makers like DFI were destroyed by nVidia's fiasco, while the ones who're still around managed to avoid any reputational damage from it.
  • jabber - Saturday, April 23, 2016 - link

    I never had an issue with the nVidia SATA drivers. The only thing that screwed the build was the nVidia Network monitoring/security drivers. I used to help buddies with poor NF4 setups by asking first if they installed that. Yes they had. You only ever tried installing that crap once.
  • danjw - Thursday, April 21, 2016 - link

    In the chipset chart you have: "Supports Intel Xeon E5-1200 v5 CPUs" that should be "E3-1200 v5".
  • sivaplus - Friday, April 22, 2016 - link

    Indeed. Just because I saw E5-12... I knew there is something fishy here :). Still E5-14xx support would have been nice at this price point
  • Lord 666 - Thursday, April 21, 2016 - link

    So frustrating to see the ram maxed out at 64gb. The x99 platform maxes out at 128gb. Hoping a x99 successor arrives supporting skylake CPUs
  • kgardas - Thursday, April 21, 2016 - link

    Indeed, but this is Intel marketing. For more RAM on Xeon you need to go to D/E5 territory...
  • SFNR1 - Friday, April 22, 2016 - link

    Before the v5, there was a limit of 32GB so 64GB is a huge improvement here (finally), but yes, it's a pain. >ou would have to buy a Xeon E5 1x http://ark.intel.com/compare/82767,82766,82765,827... . That pricebump is insane.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now