ASUS Maximus VIII Extreme BIOS

A large portion of this page will be identical to the Maximus VIII Impact review, updated for specific M8E features.

For users well accustomed to BIOS layout, it makes sense when a company uses the same basic libraries throughout their product stack. It makes sense for time and development, and there can be some leeway in customization for different types of products. So this is what I mean when I say that users who are familiar with ASUS’ main line of motherboards (the -Pro, the -A, the –Deluxe and other) will also understand what goes on with ROG. There are differences, and the first two to notice are the color scheme moving red but also that the BIOS enters straight into advanced mode, bypassing EZ mode.

But let us step back a bit, and move to EZ mode. For users who want to deal only in EZ mode, there is a setting which forces it as the default BIOS entry point.

Similar to other EZ modes we have seen from ASUS, this one gives details on the motherboard name, the BIOS version, the CPU installed, the speed of the CPU, the amount of memory installed, a graph of CPU temperature over time (useful if you’ve forgot to plug in the CPU fan… oops), the CPU voltage, the motherboard chipset temperature the speed the memory is running at, a per-DRAM slot label of what memory is installed, a per-SATA port label of what drives are installed, a quick button for XMP, a quick button for RST, a per-fan rundown of fan speeds, a diagram of the fan power control for the CPU fan, a quick button to customize the fan profiles, an EZ system tuning list for quick updating, and a boot priority list. Pretty much 90% of what you want a motherboard for, especially if you are the family computer guy fixing it.

Pressing F11 brings up the EZ Tuning Wizard to help users get some basic overclocking and RAID controls.

The EZ Wizard asks a couple of questions, such as what the system is used for (gaming or daily tasks/media consumption), what cooling is installed (stock cooler, tower cooler, liquid cooling, unknown), and then uses a lookup table and attempts to apply a sufficient overclock. It beats many ‘set it and see’ overclocking tools on other motherboards purely on user experience, even if results are similar.

Here for example I chose Daily Computing with a Stock Cooler, and it offered a 12% overclock for the i7-6700K (moving from 4.0 GHz to 4.5 GHz) and no change in the DRAM (DDR4-2133), then asked to enable it.

For the EZ RAID option, this makes the task of implementing RST on Intel configured RAID ports easier by providing a step-by-step guide.

Also on the EZ Mode page we have access to quick fan controls under Q-Fan:

The system will allow each fan to be configured either by PWM or DC controls where possible, and offers four presets (standard, silent, turbo, full speed) as well as manual control of a multi-point fan gradient. On the left hand side is the ‘Optimize All’ option, which provides per-fan tuning.

Moving back into Advanced Mode, and similar to previous motherboards ASUS is offering a My Favorites menu to allow users who have specific settings they want to tweak (typically overclockers), then options can be added here. For the Z170 platform, ASUS is now pre-filling the My Favorites menu with a number of options they feel are best suited for overclocking, such as core ratios, base frequency, DRAM multiplier, voltages and power options.

For the main glut of overclocking options though, the Extreme Tweaker menu has them all.

A wider range of CPU overclocking options are exposed on this first set of screens, with additional menu options for DRAM, power management and ‘extreme tweaking’. For users with the LN2 header enabled, more obscure options are also offered. However, the first option at the top is relatively interesting as a set of overclocking presets:

The majority of these are for extreme overclockers, but the Gamers’ OC profile is one we have tested in the OC section (along with the TPU options). The Gamers’ OC gives a 48/47/46/45 multiplier overclock with 1.425 volts set in the BIOS with LLC at Level 7. On our test bed with our #2 CPU, this passed our tests.

Similarly in the DRAM section, we also get a list of presets for extreme overclocking:

Most of these require knowledge into the memory you have, and are typically used by those close to ASUS’ in-house overclocking team.

Moving away from overclocking, and the Advanced menu holds most of the typical motherboard options for enabling/disabling controllers, organizing storage controls, C-states and USB configuration. I think the best bit about this is the SMART information screen.

Similar to OS tools to read SMART data, here we get information about power-on hours, power cycles and drive temperature. This sort of information tool is slowly moving into BIOSes of all the manufacturers, which is a good thing to see.

A menu for the Thunderbolt controller is also here, including Boot and Wake support.

Next up in the BIOS is the monitoring tools, which also doubles as the place for manual fan controls without the graph.

As the Impact has several additional temperature sensor headers onboard for additional thermistors, these can be added and configures here as well.

The Q-Fan control in text looks similar to other fan control software, and allows for separate fan header adjustment in DC or PWM mode.

Boot override and CSM controls are found in the Boot Menu, which also has the option for Above 4G Decoding if anyone wants to pair the motherboard with a MIC.

The last set of features for the BIOS are in the Tool menu.

ASUS has updated its EZ Flash tool to generation 3, allowing it to also probe an online server for an updated BIOS version, which is similar to what ASRock does. Secure Erase still features in the ROG BIOSes, as well as overclocking profiles, SPD information and GPU information. The thing missing from ASUS’ repertoire is a Board Explorer mode, similar to what ASRock and MSI have, which shows a diagram of the motherboard and what is installed in each port. As a method of showing if certain DRAM modules are not detected, or SATA drives not found, it provides a good user experience for most users (though one could argue that the various lists around the BIOS already do this, though they are not currently in one place).

 

Visual Inspection and Test Setup Software
Comments Locked

70 Comments

View All Comments

  • saratoga4 - Thursday, April 7, 2016 - link

    >if you care about audio you're exiting it on hdmi anyway

    Maybe for speakers, but not headphones. Good headphone amps on receivers are surprisingly rare. HDMI replaces line out for a lot of people, which is why its unfortunate that reviewers typically test line out and ignore headphone out.
  • Impulses - Friday, April 8, 2016 - link

    If you're only using headphones you can still do TOSlink out to an excellent outboard DAC/amp for $150-300 (less than an AVR) and it'll blow away anything that could be built into a mobo... Or just get a Xonar STX for $150, still pretty solid and the amp will still be better than anything on a mobo.
  • jptech7 - Friday, April 8, 2016 - link

    For headphone equipment, most are using USB audio or TOSLINK in my experience, but the idea is the same. I still respect the effort that Asus put into the audio system.
  • Ubercake - Friday, April 8, 2016 - link

    Even a $300 pro-level Asus board has exceptional on-board sound; better than many soundcards even in the $100-$150 range. In my opinion, the price on most sound cards is way too high, though the low demand due to people using great on-board sound might be the reason for the high price.
  • Silma - Thursday, April 7, 2016 - link

    This motherboard only makes sense for people who need low DPC latency, so mostly people in the audio/music industry.
    Otherwise the market is flooded with excellent 150 $ motherboards, which leave 350 $ to spend on a better graphic card, NVMe SSD, more memory or whatever makes sense for the user.
  • willis936 - Thursday, April 7, 2016 - link

    Dude it's 2016.
  • Dr. Swag - Thursday, April 7, 2016 - link

    I know you guys are hard at work on all the different articles and reviews and I appreciate it, but just wondering where is the article you guys promised 2 months ago on a review and ipc analysis of the Athlon x4 845? I'm really looking forward to that since depending on how big of an improvement Excavator is it could also affect Zen (since AMD said Zen is Excavator+ 40% or more), and I'm super excited for Zen. It's been nearly 2 months, and I know the x4 845 wasn't out then but it's been on the market for at least a month now. Just curious on how far you guys are on that and if it is coming out soon.
    If you don't know what I'm talking about and somehow completely forgot about it, here is the link to the original comment:
    http://www.anandtech.com/comments/10000/who-contro...
  • ghanz - Thursday, April 7, 2016 - link

    Seconded.
  • extide - Thursday, April 7, 2016 - link

    On page one, the Motherboard Comparison table is all screwed up. If you pick Asrock Z170 Extreme 7+, you get the stats for the MSI Gaming M7. If you pick the MSI Gaming M7, you get the stats of something else. If you pick the Asus Z170A you get the stats for the Asrock Extreme 7+. Please fix!
  • extide - Thursday, April 7, 2016 - link

    I am sure they are all messed up, those are only the ones I knew were wrong off the top of my head.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now