Over the past few months I’ve been able to spend some quality time with the iPad Pro and I’ve found that while the iPad Pro isn’t quite a computer replacement in the sense that you should toss your laptop out, it is the first tablet that can actually justify itself relative to a phablet. With the 9.7” iPad Pro, Apple has been able to take the elements of the iPad Pro 12.9” that differentiated it from Android tablets and previous iterations of the iPad, and fit it in a smaller form factor.

The main points of differentiation that make this device more than an iPad Air 3 include the Apple Pencil, Smart Keyboard, and speakers. The Apple Pencil behaves identically relative to the larger device, but the smaller display size makes it feel more cramped. Other than this, the feel of the tip on the glass is identical, as is the pressure sensitivity, tilt sensitivity, and latency.

The Smart Keyboard for this version of the iPad Pro is significantly smaller than the version for the 13” iPad Pro. Right away it felt like it was a lot less comfortable to type on this iteration of the iPad Pro as a result as I couldn’t just rely on sheer muscle memory to place my fingers in the right place every time. However with some practice I was able to keep a typing pace that was pretty much identical, although it was relatively easy to make mistakes relative to a laptop keyboard because the keys are smaller so there’s less tolerance for errors in finger placement. With practice, like a smartphone keyboard, I’m sure it’ll be possible to type as quickly as you would on a laptop but I wasn’t able to reach that level of practice over the course of the two or so minutes I could spend with the keyboard.

Other than the size issue, everything else feels basically identical to the larger iteration of the Smart Keyboard. Those that love mechanical keyboards for their travel and tactile feedback will probably be disappointed by the feel, but I tend to bottom out keys no matter what keyboard I’m typing on so to me the relatively shallow travel of the keys was not a problem when it came to typing at a respectable rate.

Of course, the speakers are also shared with the iPad Pro, but in this case I wasn’t really able to test them properly as the hands on environment is rather chaotic and loud. I wouldn’t be surprised to know that the same speaker protection ICs are shared with the larger version of the iPad Pro for logistics reasons, but I wasn’t able to confirm that this is the case at the event. Similarly, the camera was not properly tested at the event as it wasn’t possible to do a proper comparison in the hands on environment.

The one other notable change that the 9.7” iPad Pro brings is True Tone display, which adjusts color temperature of the display based upon ambient light conditions. It turns out that this is something that you can toggle on and off on the fly, and the result that it produces seems to be designed to make the display more consistently neutral while other Apple mobile devices tend to end up with a colder white balance in most conditions. I didn’t see a toggle for color gamut, so it’s likely that the iPad Pro 9.7” is using either color management to enable a wider gamut on the fly or just displaying a wider color gamut all the time. To figure out which way Apple went here we’ll need to try a review unit, but given just how much emphasis Apple has placed on their displays I would be surprised if Apple wasn't employing color management.

Other than these points of differentiation, the iPad Pro 9.7” pretty much feels like any other iPad. However, there are a few notable changes to the design, including a camera hump to handle the 12MP camera and replacing the large plastic RF window on the LTE variants with an external aluminum antenna and insulating plastic to separate it from the rest of the chassis. It’s appreciably lighter than the iPad Pro 13”, but feels pretty much identical to the iPad Air 2 in terms of size and weight.

Overall, if you liked the 13” iPad Pro but didn’t want to deal with the extra size or weight, it looks like this will be exactly what you’re looking for.

POST A COMMENT

67 Comments

View All Comments

  • lilmoe - Tuesday, March 22, 2016 - link

    I'd say that it is, in fact, amazing that they can keep up a such a powerful, robust and solidly stable OS running on a plethora of hardware configurations, including their own. Yet manage to make it arguably faster and lighter than any other fully fledged desktop OS out there...

    Stop blaming Microsoft for driver issues they're obviously not responsible for. They meant for their latest products to be on the bleeding edge, and work exactly like how a modern consumer expects them to; sleep and wake like their smartphones. After a couple of hiccups (which again, aren't their fault), I'd say they surely delivered.
    Reply
  • damianrobertjones - Tuesday, March 22, 2016 - link

    Suggestion: As it's already fast enough why not actually shut the thing down? Reply
  • lilmoe - Tuesday, March 22, 2016 - link

    Are you on an Insider Build? If not, do you have the latest firmware update?
    Thurrott was pretty vocal about this particular issue, and he's now confirming that it's completely fixed, at least on his machines.

    It turns out that the issue was mostly driver problems from Intel, and some (older?) Win32 applications not playing nicely with the new connected standby mechanism. The CPU/platform c-states newly supported by Skylake weren't being set correctly when the OS was set to sleep.

    SP4 and Surface Books (and any other Skylake system with the option supported/enabled in BIOS) support instant sleep and wake, which works exactly like an ARM tablet/phone. And speaking from experience, Windows 10 in Tablet Mode is much more intuitive and fluid than Android and iOS on a tablet.
    Reply
  • Henry 3 Dogg - Wednesday, April 20, 2016 - link

    The Surface Pro 4 is a great high end netbook. But pricey.

    It really isn't usable as a tablet.
    Reply
  • Cygni - Monday, March 21, 2016 - link

    I can't see myself buying any of these phones or tablets with a camera hump. I often use them flat on a hard surface, like a table or desk. I've heard that the wobble is fairly small with the iPhone 6, but for the price, that's pretty unacceptable to me.

    Maybe I'm an edge case, but this seems like a pretty upfront design failing in many products today.
    Reply
  • Murloc - Monday, March 21, 2016 - link

    rather than a failing it's a forced choice since customers want the latest and better. Reply
  • jollypike - Monday, March 21, 2016 - link

    Many folks put their expensive device in a protective case so I guess a camera bump , whilst imperfect, isn't usually a problem. I go one further and put front and rear protectors on too. Reply
  • Cygni - Monday, March 21, 2016 - link

    A 9.7in tablet in a case...? Reply
  • secretmanofagent - Monday, March 21, 2016 - link

    Smart Case, any number of third party ones that protect both the back and the screen. It's pretty common. Reply
  • stephenbrooks - Tuesday, March 22, 2016 - link

    (I also never understood the people who get the "thinnest, lightest" phone and then put it in a thick, heavy plastic case.) Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now