Mixed Random Read/Write Performance

The mixed random I/O benchmark starts with a pure read test and gradually increases the proprotion of writes, finishing with pure writes. The queue depth is 3 for the entire test and each subtest lasts for 3 minutes, for a total test duration of 18 minutes. As with the pure random write test, this test is restricted to a 16GB span of the drive, which is empty save for the 16GB test file.

Iometer - Mixed 4KB Random Read/Write

Despite its poor random write speed, the SP550 keeps pace overall with its low-end competition on the mixed random I/O test.

Iometer - Mixed 4KB Random Read/Write (Power)

The SP550's power consumption is good but not great, so its efficiency ends up better than competitors like the OCZ Trion 100 and the SanDisk Ultra II, but the high-end drives are delivering performance that more than justifies their higher power consumption.

The drives that score best on the mixed random I/O test benefit from a big spike in performance in the write-heavy final stages, but the SP550 doesn't have that peak. Its performance variation across this test is relatively small, and the power consumption only grows modestly as the workload becomes more write-heavy.

Mixed Sequential Read/Write Performance

The mixed sequential access test covers the entire span of the drive and uses a queue depth of one. It starts with a pure read test and gradually increases the proprotion of writes, finishing with pure writes. Each subtest lasts for 3 minutes, for a total test duration of 18 minutes. The drive is filled before the test starts.

Iometer - Mixed 128KB Sequential Read/Write

Unlike the mixed random test, the SP550's poor write speeds really hurt it relative to the competition on the mixed sequential test and keep it near the bottom of the chart.

Iometer - Mixed 128KB Sequential Read/Write (Power)

The SP550's power consumption isn't out of control like the Crucial BX200's, but its efficiency is still poor.

Top performers on the mixed sequential test show a U-shaped performance curve and the winner is often determined by which drives suffer least during the middle stages of this test. The SP550 starts out great in the pure-read phase of the test, but it's all downhill from there.

Sequential Performance ATTO, AS-SSD & Idle Power Consumption
Comments Locked

25 Comments

View All Comments

  • Kristian Vättö - Sunday, March 27, 2016 - link

    It takes about 25 to 30 minutes. The software doesn't try to playback the trace as fast as possible because that would result in unrealistic queue depths. All QDs are the same as in the trace, but idle times are truncated to 25µs to speed up the test.
  • bogdan_kr - Friday, April 1, 2016 - link

    Thank you, sir! It's good to know this.
  • eek2121 - Saturday, March 26, 2016 - link

    Just bought the 960 gb version of this drive to use for my Steam folder. A lot of people are bitching about TLC in this forum, but I've had 0 issues with my 840 EVO that I ordered 3 years ago.
  • adam261222 - Thursday, June 23, 2016 - link

    That moment you get 2 put them in raid 0 but you get speeds of 480MB/s read... Can you think of any fixes or reasons for why this is happening?
  • Derrick Lo - Friday, July 1, 2016 - link

    So far, I've been using the Adata Premier SP550 SSD (240GB) for about 4 months (since Mar-2016), and things are good: My laptop bootup speed is up by about 3 times, to under 30 seconds! Worth the upgrade from HDD to SSD!

    Only thing was the need to use a disk imaging software to copy the laptop OS & setup from the old HDD to the new SSD.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now