Display

As always, the display of any mobile device is a critical part of the overall user experience. A poor display in any way is often going to sour the entire experience.

On a personal note, there are a number of mobile devices that I’ve used over the course of the previous year that frankly just weren’t good enough for me to use as a daily driver because the display just wasn’t good enough. My laptop is quite closely calibrated to sRGB and it’s used to edit all of my device photos, so I’ve really come to appreciate a device that has sufficiently accurate color that I can actually use a phone or tablet as a reference monitor of sorts to verify that images look the way I want them to.

In order to test this critical portion of the user experience, we turn to our standard test suite which uses SpectraCal’s CalMAN 5, a custom workflow for testing basic metrics like brightness, contrast, and calibration accuracy, and X-Rite’s i1Pro2 and i1DisplayPro.

Starting off with a microscope's view of the Galaxy S7's display, it looks like Samsung has elected to keep most aspects of the display constant when comparing the Galaxy S6 and S7. At a high level, the display is the same 5.1” display size that we’ve seen for a few generations now, and the 1440p resolution is shared with previous devices. Samsung continues to use their diamond PenTile layout, but it’s hard for me to say whether there’s been an adjustment to the size of the emitters as the microscope I have on hand isn’t quite sufficient for making such measurements. It’s likely that under the hood there are changes to the display driver IC in order to enable features like Always-On Display, but as we’ll soon see it’s rather unlikely that there are any generational changes in things like the emitter material or TFT backplane.

Display - Max Brightness

One of our first tests here is a pretty standard test of maximum luminance. Here, we see that the Galaxy S7 and S7 edge both are in the same general ballpark as the Galaxy Note5, which suggests that both devices are likely to be in the same generation of AMOLED panel. This brightness was achieved by using the auto-brightness mode, so it’s important to note that the max luminance in manual mode will be much lower. Of course, this brightness figure was determined with a full white display so reducing the APL will result in a higher maximum luminance as the power budget can we spent on fewer pixels which means that a higher duty cycle can be achieved in each pixel.


Galaxy S7


Galaxy S7 edge

Display - Grayscale Accuracy

Display - White Point

The next part of our testing is grayscale. As always, we target the industry standard of a 2.2 power gamma with 6504k white point. Relative to the Galaxy S6 and Note5, we see a pretty significant improvement in white point accuracy as it’s pretty much consistently quite close to a neutral white rather than a warmer color balance. Unfortunately though, in both review units I received the display has a noticeable green tint for many shades of grey, which seems to be somewhat of a perpetual problem with Samsung AMOLED displays. This really does affect quite a bit of the UI, as Material Design greys have this noticeable green tint to them that really makes things look off.

The same issue seems to not be present on the Galaxy S7 edge, which leads to a significant improvement overall in calibration quality for this portion of the testing, but both devices have a noticeably lower gamma than expected, which does have some effect on accuracy but for the most part can help to serve as a compensation mechanism for reflectance when dealing with ambient light. It’s likely that the green tint issue may only appear on a device to device basis, but to see that such issues haven’t been resolved for years is somewhat concerning given that phones costing hundreds of dollars less don’t seem to have the same problems.


Galaxy S7


Galaxy S7 edge

Display - Saturation Accuracy

The next portion of our testing is the standard saturation sweep test. Here, the Galaxy S7 and S7 edge are basically perfect. It’s great to see that Samsung continues to provide their Basic color mode with a real focus on providing accurate color calibration for those that care about these things, and the user experience with getting to the right color calibration is pretty much as painless as it can be compared to some other devices where things like saturation curves, white balance, and other parts of a display calibration can only be adjusted using unitless sliders that basically require a spectrophotometer to actually use.


Galaxy S7


Galaxy S7 edge

Display - GMB Accuracy

In our Gretag MacBeth ColorChecker test, we see that there are some issues with grayscale accuracy, but overall color accuracy remains quite good. In terms of overall display quality, I don’t really think there’s any meaningful improvement over the Galaxy S6, but that’s mostly because the Galaxy S6 set a ridiculously high bar for display quality.

However, I don’t believe that Samsung has run out of things to improve for future AMOLD displays. In addition to the grayscale problems mentioned earlier, Samsung clearly has not resolved issues with color shifting that occurs with viewing angle changes. LCDs definitely have more luminance degradation as you move away from the normal of the display plane, but at almost every angle change I can see whites get noticeably colder and interference patterns, in addition to a general color shift that is noticeably more than most LCDs used in high end smartphones and tablets. It’s obvious that this is a hard problem to solve due to uneven subpixel aging, but for things like tablets, laptops, and desktops color shifting is going to be a much more significant issue.

GPU Performance Software UX
Comments Locked

202 Comments

View All Comments

  • bodonnell - Tuesday, March 8, 2016 - link

    Any chance you'll be doing an in depth review of the Exynos 8890 equipped model. I would really like to see an in depth review that compared it to the SD820. Preliminary benchmarks seem to suggest it is comparable in the CPU department but behind in the GPU department. Since it looks like us Canadians will be getting the Exynos variant I'd like to see if we'll actually notice a difference in everyday use...
  • tipoo - Tuesday, March 8, 2016 - link

    That's really strange! Usually it's NA vs world, but why would Canada get Exynos while the US gets SD820?
  • bodonnell - Tuesday, March 8, 2016 - link

    It is pretty odd as Samsung usually ships the same hardware to both Canada and the US. It seems in this case they are only shipping the SD820 version in CDMA markets and since Canada is all GSM we are getting the Exynos version. I don't know that this has been 100% confirmed yet though, that's just what the rumour mill is saying.
  • phoenix_rizzen - Monday, April 11, 2016 - link

    It's true, the Canadian version uses the Exynos 8890 SoC (as shown by CPU-Z, and CPU Spy on this Telus S7).
  • zeeBomb - Tuesday, March 8, 2016 - link

    OMG...! JOSH!!! you made my dreams come true with a blessed review.
  • nathanddrews - Tuesday, March 8, 2016 - link

    Still completely stupefied as to Samsung's (and Google's) decision to continue with this whole black text on white background thing, knowing full well the OLED consumes more power when pushing white. Also, it's ugly.
  • Qwertilot - Tuesday, March 8, 2016 - link

    Less net area of text than background, surely?
  • theduckofdeath - Tuesday, March 8, 2016 - link

    It's less straining for your eye to read black text on white (which is why you'rereading this in black on white right now :D ). Also, the brightness of the system settings is to be fair completely irrelevant in the long run. Once you've tinkered with whichever settings you prefer, you rarely ever go into those menus again. Making the UI look consistent clearly has a bigger weight in that design choice.
  • WagonWheelsRX8 - Tuesday, March 8, 2016 - link

    Pretty good write-up.
    I have one request: In your charts, can you put the SoC powering the device (in smaller letters) underneath the name of the device? It would be helpful to understand why a device performs like it does (is it SoC related or subsystem or software), and it's pretty standard info in PC based reviews. Otherwise, keep up the good work!
  • foneAddict - Tuesday, March 8, 2016 - link

    Please Please Please can you do a review of the Exynos 8890 variant. I have a sneaky suspicion battery life on this SoC will be significantly better than SD820.

    Great review as always. Looking forward to part deux :-)

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now