Motherboards Memory Storage Cases/Cooling/PSUs IT Computing Displays Mobile Mac CPUs & Chipsets Video Digital Cameras Linux Gadgets Systems Trade Shows Guides Home Increase Font Size Decrease Font Size Change Page Size
WD launches a 1TB 2.5" Hard Drive
WD launches a 1TB 2.5
Date: July 27th, 2009
Author: Gary Key
Buy the WDC WD1001FALS Caviar Black Digital
Blank
 Newegg $99.99
 TigerDirect $94.99
 Amazon $99.99
 
 



Western Digital informed us this morning that it had begun shipping 2.5" mobile hard drives with capacities of 1TB and 750GB, which is an industry first. The Scorpio Blue 1TB hard drive sports an impressive three 333GB platters spinning at 5,200 RPM. Each drive comes with 8MB of cache and a 3Gb/s Serial ATA interface. WD claims acoustic levels of 24-26 dB(A) depending on idle and load conditions. Power consumption numbers are at SSD levels with quoted figures of 0.10W at idle and 2.5W during normal read/write operation.

The one drawback for either drive is that both utilize the 12.5mm form factor instead of the de facto standard 9.5mm. This means the drives are ideally suited for external storage solutions, larger DTR notebook designs, or small form factor desktop systems. However, your mileage will vary depending on the design of your notebook.

The Scorpio Blue 750GB (WD7500KEVT) is "available now through select distributors/resellers" with an MSRP of $189.99. The 1TB Scorpio Blue (WD10TEVT) is also available today, but configured into the My Passport Essential SE Portable USB drive product series. It will be shipping to the retail channel in the near future with an estimated MSRP of $249.99. Each drive carries a limited three-year warranty. We have review samples on the way and will look at their performance in an external enclosure and SFF setup shortly.


21 Comments
Username:
Password:
Hmm why not the mark of the beast? by Pneumothorax, 197 days ago
I'm surprised WD doesn't release a 2 platter version of this drive at the 9.5mm factor. Many of us already max out our 500gb drives and 666gb would be welcome. (I'm using a MBP with a even split between osx & Win7 partitions.

Reply
RE: Hmm why not the mark of the beast? by Starcub, 197 days ago
I agree about needing 9.5mm drives. I know I would have trouble fitting 12mm drives even in my external case. That form factor should not exist, it only causes confusion in the market.

Reply
RE: Hmm why not the mark of the beast? by The0ne, 197 days ago
I have to agree. It's a poor decision. I don't know of one laptop (netbook, notebook, etc.) that can use this 12mm drive without some modifications. I could use two of these in my Vostro 17 seeing as it has two slots but there is no chance I will install this new drive and have my laptop sticking out on the bottom.

I hope this utterly fails and forces them back to standards that millions of consumers are already on and using.

Reply
RE: Hmm why not the mark of the beast? by sprockkets, 197 days ago
They will probably just release like a 640 or 650GB version of this HDD for notebooks with 2 platters.

Reply
RE: Hmm why not the mark of the beast? by Souka, 195 days ago
We have some HP notebooks we use for CADD (they have the pricey quadro cards in them)...they have a 12.5mm bay for the HD.

But yeah...most notebooks max out at 9mm...I seem to recall 7mm 2.5" devices being out now...great..another standard....

:)

Reply
RE: Hmm why not the mark of the beast? by overstim, 187 days ago
My Macbook Pro 17" (latest model pre-unibody) takes a 12.5" HDD. I installed a WD500GB about a year ago.

Reply
RE: Hmm why not the mark of the beast? by mschira, 196 days ago
Hm. Does anybody know how many platters the 1TB drive has?
Could it be 4?
M.

Reply
RE: Hmm why not the mark of the beast? by iamezza, 196 days ago
try reading the article

Reply
Server Archives by Casper42, 197 days ago
These would fit quite nicely in place of Server SAS drives though.
Could add 1 of these to an existing server using SAS drives and RAID in order to have a separate backup drive.

And the 12.5mm height won't be an issue there.

Reply
I don't know about you guys, but by dragunover, 197 days ago
Servers would be the ideal spot for these kinds of drive in the first place. Maybe not cost efficient but size and energy efficient.
I don't think many people need 1tb in their laptops unless it costs like 4,000 USD and is a mobile workstation.

Reply
RE: I don't know about you guys, but by mschira, 196 days ago
4000Dollar mobile workstations should have a SSD-drive.
It's the single most effective way to speed up a laptop.
M.

Reply
RE: I don't know about you guys, but by dilidolo, 196 days ago
Seagate has many 2.5' enterprise offers although only maxed at 500GB. I doubt WD enven has a chance to step in. Actually I've almost never seen any WD disks in enterprise storage.

Reply
RE: I don't know about you guys, but by Etern205, 194 days ago
WD's version of enteriprise storage is the Raptor.
Compared to Seagate's Cheetah SAS 15K.x it's no where near it
in terms of performance.
Seagate Cheetah SAS > WD Raptor

If it was SSD then it's
SSD>SAS>SATA

Reply
RE: I don't know about you guys, but by runarB, 190 days ago
Don't understand how you can compare two different storage-interfaces with one storage tecnology. I haven't heard alot about SSD-SAS drives, most about SSD-SATA.

Reply
T-REX by MODEL3, 197 days ago
Seems that the R&D for the next version of raptor is going well

Reply
RE: T-REX by RocketChild, 195 days ago
With the lowered cost of Intel's latest SSD, a new breed of Raptor better be pretty cheap.

Reply
Will it fit is the PS3??? by tbogstad, 197 days ago
It would be nice for that purpose too.

Reply
they are not the first 12mm 2.5 beasts by mschira, 196 days ago
They are just the first 12mm drives that make big headlines.
Considering, that I think it's a bit of a letdown that 17" Notebooks don't have the space for them. Not sure about Small form factor desktops. I think a desktop casing that doesn't have the space for a 12cm drive is a major design failure.

Yes, and of course we need dedicated desktop versions of these 2.5" behemoths! Faster spindle speed, so we get maximum performance. A RAID 5 with 4 of the beasts would be a nice thing.
The power and heat should still be much smaller than a 3.5" brick.

As to portable notebooks they should just move to 1.8" and take SSD. I would be happy with fast 64Gb. If you are desperate for space an external 1TB should fit the bill without wasting too much of the convenience you gained from the lighter notebook thanks to SSD. Of course different people may want different solutions (i.e the good old internal fairly spacious HDD). But for most folks that want a portable computer...
M.
M.


Reply
Wonderful by MadBoris, 196 days ago
333GB platters spinning at 5,200 RPM ?

Wow, that's alot of storage going no where fast.
All that extra areal density with lack of spindle speed to really take full advantage.

I'm sure to those in need of storage on a laptop this may be impressive, but I'm completely unimpressed by a laptop drive at 5200 RPM. Match it with 7200 RPM, then you'd have a screamer.

While I'm sure their are technical hurdles that keep these mechanical drives so slow, next year SSD's should easily destroy these drives while still on the market in both storage and speed.

Reply
RE: Wonderful by PenguinTrail, 188 days ago
The 320/333GB platters in a notebook drive are much smaller than the platters in a desktop drive = high areal density = higher performance.

I recently did an extensive test (http://blog.penguintrail.com/?p=257) of Seagate's unannouced 640GB 2.5" drive (it's 9.5mm so this one will actually fit in your notebook). In terms of raw throughput, the drive is as fast or faster than a 7200rpm 2.5" drive based on my testing. The density makes that possible, even though there is a slower spindle speed. The tradeoff is access time, but if you want capacity on the go then buying a high density drive like the Seagate or WD is the best way to go. Otherwise, skip the 7200rpm drive and get an SSD

Reply
RE: Wonderful by varase, 97 days ago
Well, with a 12ms seek and 5200 rpm it probably puts a fair number of bytes under the heads at any one time - the only problem is average rotational latency goes up. The number of bytes in a cylinder are probably fairly impressive.

Not sure I trust SSDs - each cell WILL fail at some finite number of state changes, and I'm not sure how much 1TB of SSD will run.

Reply
Comments Page 1 of 1





AnandTech.com Blog Categories
All categories
Anand's Macdates
Anand's Theater Construction
Anand's Updates
Cases and Power Supplies
CeBIT 2008
CES 2008
Computex 2009
Derek Decanted
Eddie's Got Game
Gary's First Looks
IT Computing general
Jarred's Musings
Kris's Corner
Raja's Ramblings
Rob's Experiences...
Ryan's Ramblings
Virtualization
What's New with Wes
Blank
Blank

Blank

Latest news by
DailyTech

 February 9, 2010

Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank

 February 8, 2010

Blank


more Blogs Discussions



pipeboost
Copyright © 1997-2010 AnandTech, Inc. All rights reserved. Terms, Conditions and Privacy Information.
Click Here for Advertising Information