Motherboards Memory Storage Cases/Cooling/PSUs IT Computing Displays Mobile Mac CPUs & Chipsets Video Digital Cameras Linux Gadgets Systems Trade Shows Guides Home Increase Font Size Decrease Font Size Change Page Size
Seagate announces the Barracuda LP HD Series
Seagate announces the Barracuda LP HD Series
Date: April 22nd, 2009
Author: Gary Key
Buy the Barracuda ST31500341AS ST3160813AS
Blank
 
 



In celebration of Earth Day we have an announcement from Seagate about their new Barracuda LP lineup. The marketing checklist is very similar to the Western Digital Caviar Green series: reduced spindle speeds, low noise, even lower power consumption, and performance that is more than acceptable for the entry level, home office, SOHO NAS, or HTPC audiences.

The Barracuda LP is launching today (product availability later this week) in 1TB, 1.5TB, and 2TB capacities. The drives feature a 500GB per-platter design, 32MB buffer, and a 5,900RPM spindle speed. WD has never officially stated the Caviar Green's actual spindle speeds, but we think they are somewhere between 5,400RPM to 5,700RPM based on performance metrics. According to Seagate's press presentation earlier this week, the LP drives are fast enough to outperform their Caviar Green counterparts while offering improved power and noise levels.

Based on Seagate's internal testing (review samples arrive shortly) the drives are rated at 19dB(A) at idle and around 20dB(A) under load. This compares to the WD Caviar Green 2TB at 19db(A) idle and near 21db(A) under load. Power consumption is very close also, Seagate reports 3W at idle and 5.6W during operation, compared to 3W at idle and 5.72W under load for the WD drive.

Since this drive lineup will end up in external storage devices, Seagate has designed it with a rugged operating environment in mind. The drive's shock tolerance is rated to 70Gs under operation and 300Gs in power off mode.

Seagate's new Barracuda LP series looks to set a new bar in the low-power / low-noise high capacity market but you will pay for it at the upper end. Seagate quoted the suggested retail prices of $118 for the Barracuda LP 1TB, $156 for 1.5TB, and $358 for the 2TB version. Current street prices for the 1TB Caviar Green range around $100, $160 for the 1.5TB drive, and 2TB of eco-friendly storage will cost you $299.99.


25 Comments
Username:
Password:
Great: slower drives, higher price by StraightPipe, 212 days ago
Just what I've been asking for!

//sarcasm

Reply
rpms? by UltraWide, 212 days ago
Why not 6,000rpm?

LOL

Reply
Who wants green drives? by Davelo, 212 days ago
I assume these drives are intended for Macs as only that segment puts green ahead of performance.

Reply
RE: Who wants green drives? by fri2219, 212 days ago
Wrong. Nice attempt at Apple bashing, but you should get your mother's help next time you use the tubes of the interwebs.

There's thousands of examples of how wrong you are, but try these for a start:
http://www.silentpcreview.com/
http://www.freegeek.org/

Reply
RE: Who wants green drives? by fri2219, 212 days ago
Also, try looking up what google's number one operating expense is, or find an adult who can look it up for you on EDGAR.

Reply
RE: Who wants green drives? I want them!!! by Havor, 211 days ago
Are you kidding?

If they would make 2~3000 rpm drives i would still be intrested to buy them, if that would mean that they would use even less power and produce less heat.

Lower rpm would properly also mean the drives have a longer live

I have a 12TB A/V server at home, and these type of drives helps lowering my electric bill, for playback of films there is no need for fast sustain speed, just need a minimum of 40mbit for the BR films i have ripped

Not all drives are used to start up games and programs, and these drives are excellent for backup and A/V usage.
Just as some people are interested in Atom based systems because they don't have the need for speed.
http://www.hardware.info/nl-NL/usersys/cmpxYp1lk2id/view/

Reply
if you don't like them, don't buy them by garydale, 212 days ago
Let's remember that one size rarely fits all. These drives are intended to reduce power usage, including facility cooling, not run your games at warp 10. Their performance is adequate for media server applications where their low noise is also a plus.

I run a home server (Debian Gnu/Linux) with a software RAID array. I've never needed hot-swap capability so I use a desktop case. When you put multiple drives in, you have to watch the temperature around the drives. And because the server is always running, power consumption is an important consideration. Moreover, network performance is the limiting factor, not read speed, in getting data from a RAID array.

So don't put them in your game machine, but don't disparage something that fills an important niche in the market.

Reply
Yeah right by majortom1981, 212 days ago
EVERY single Seagate drive i have ever owned died within a year.

Somebody please tell me why i should buy another hdd drive from this company?

Reply
RE: Yeah right by Bremen7000, 212 days ago
Because your anecdotes don't constitute anything more than statistical noise?

Reply
RE: Yeah right by Anonymous Freak, 212 days ago
And how many Seagate drives have you owned?

I work at a small OEM that ships thousands of hard drives per year. Mostly Hitachi on the desktop, with some Seagate; and mostly Seagate in the server space, with some Hitachi.

We see a much higher *RATE* of failure (not just raw numbers,) on the Hitachi on the desktop; and even a higher raw failure *NUMBERS* in the server space; even though we ship orders of magnitude more Seagates than Hitachis in that space.

Reply
RE: Yeah right by Samus, 209 days ago
Thats funny, because storage reviews' drive reliability survey shows seagates as the most reliable drives manufactured between 2000-2007

Sounds like user error to me ;)

Reply
Yea, Seagate drives are crap... by aguilpa1, 212 days ago
I was one of the thousands with 500GB, 1TB and 1.5TB drives that had bad firmwares that bricked their drives. Than Seagate had the audacity to ask for a couple of thousand dollars to unbrick them. They would replace them but your data was worthless to them.

Reply
RE: Yea, Seagate drives are crap... by eli2k, 212 days ago
Happened to me, too; but if you check of MSFN forums, they have posted a solution to the problem you can undertake to fix the 'bricking' that costs around $20-50, better than sending it to Seagate, if you want your data back.

Reply
RE: Yea, Seagate drives are crap... by eli2k, 212 days ago
Happened to me, too; but if you check of MSFN forums, they have posted a solution to the problem you can undertake to fix the 'bricking' that costs around $20-50, better than sending it to Seagate, if you want your data back.

Reply
RE: Yea, Seagate drives are crap... by ClagMaster, 212 days ago
If you got burned by 7200.11 drives, then express your displeasure to Seagates mishandling of the firmware and controller the most effective way possible : Buy a Western Digital Drive as a vote of non-confidence.

I own a couple 160 GB Seagate 7200.7 drives that worked great for 5 years. No problems, no complaints.

Reply
RE: Yea, Seagate drives are crap... by aguilpa1, 211 days ago
I did. They were replaced with WD 1TB drives instead. Its important people understand what kind of quality and service Seagate provides for them once they purchase a drive.

Reply
RE: Yea, Seagate drives are crap... by garydale, 211 days ago
I've owned many drives from many companies over the years and never found much difference. Yes, the firmware problem was troubling, but I have 4 500G Seagates that are all running just fine.

I've got a WD in another machine that looks like it could go soon - some SMART errors regarding spin-up and seek times. However another WD in the same machine is OK.

As for quality and service, Seagate offers the same 3-year replacement warranty as the other manufacturers. However your data is your concern, not Seagate's. If you don't have good backups, expect to lose data.

Reply
RE: Yea, Seagate drives are crap... by ClagMaster, 211 days ago
In addition to the two 7200.7 Seagate drives, I forgot to mention I also have a 500GB 7200.11 drive on a PC I keep offline for privacy. I have been operating this drive since January 2009 (after upgrading the firmware to SD1A prior to installation of Windows XP Home) and it has been working fine so far. I use this PC every day for correspondence, diary, and other projects. I even wrote a review on the NewEgg site giving this drive 5 eggs.

Reply
RE: Yea, Seagate drives are crap... by Rasterman, 210 days ago
I've personally owned probably 15 hard drives over the years, of those around 6 have died, 1 causing major frustration (it was a my main OS install) and another causing minor data loss due to being in between backups. Hard drives are noisy, waste power, slow, and most annoyingly totally unreliable.

For my next system I will be voting for SSD in a major way with my dollars, hoping to never have to buy another hard drive again!

Reply
RE: Yea, Seagate drives are crap... by knutjb, 210 days ago
I have one of the affected Seagate drives but I waited a couple of weeks before applying the fix to make sure they got it right. Aside from that SNAFU, I have had much better luck with Seagate than WD drives, but will consider those along with Samsung or Hitachi for my next purchase. Statistically the overall failure rates are remarkably low but bad batches happen to all makers. This new drive is for a niche market and the reviews will tell if they are worth the $$$.

Reply
$358? by icrf, 212 days ago
I was hoping to see some 2 TB drives down around $250. I thought WD was only at $300 b/c no one had anything else to compete. :(

Reply
Good Concept Following Western Digital's Leadership by ClagMaster, 212 days ago
Seagate is finally following Western Digital's lead in this specialty market segment.

The Barracuda LP lineup sounds very good for mainstream desktop applications. Not only low power, but more importantly, low heat, lower noise and hopefully higher reliability. The performance is acceptable and is much better than ATA-100 drives available 3 years ago.

Although it has lower power consumption, the power savings is about 3-4W for a single drive, compared to a 7200.12 drive. Not terribly significant considering other power drains within a PC. A four drive 1+0 RAID array would mean 12-16W savings which is more significant.

Personally, I would like a faster drive since a 4W penalty, for me, is trivial.

Let's pray Seagate did their homework this time on fully qualifying the firmware for these LP drives. Lets not have another another 7200.11 fiasco. I have a number of friends who have suffered from these drives.

Gary should, with no mercy, torture test these LP drives until the truth of their reliablity is revealed.

Reply
I hope they work well in RAID 5 by Mastakilla, 211 days ago
I'm curious to know how these work with a nice RAID 5 controller like the Areca ARC-1220/1222 or the Highpoint RR 3520...

especially keeping NCQ enabled seems tricky for some drives...

Reply
Speed is not always the most important HD spec... by Zak, 209 days ago
I use external USB2 and FW enclosures as backup drives. Both are a bottleneck: they do less than 40MB/s. For such use, or HTPC, I don't need a superfast drive but capacity, noise, heat and power consumption are the most important spec, speed is almost irrelevant, as long as it 40MB/s or more. I'm looking forward to getting those when prices drop a bit for my backups and HTPC.

Z.

Reply
glasses by cheap glasses, 110 days ago
http://forums.cheapglasses123.com
http://www.cheapglasses123.com
http://www.cheapglasses123.com/forums/

http://www.cheapglasses123.com/tag/cheap-eyeglasses
http://www.cheapglasses123.com/tag/sunglasses
http://www.cheapglasses123.com/tag/desiger-glasses
http://www.cheapglasses123.com/tag/designer-glasses
http://www.cheapglasses123.com/tag/discount-eyeglasses
http://www.cheapglasses123.com/tag/discount-glasses
http://www.cheapglasses123.com/tag/eye-glasses
http://www.cheapglasses123.com/tag/eyeglasses-frames
http://www.cheapglasses123.com/tag/glasses-frames
http://www.cheapglasses123.com/tag/glasses-lenses
http://www.cheapglasses123.com/tag/glasses-online
http://www.cheapglasses123.com/tag/plastic-glasses
http://www.cheapglasses123.com/tag/plastic-glasses-frames
http://www.cheapglasses123.com/tag/prescription-glasses
http://www.cheapglasses123.com/tag/prescription-sunglasses
http://www.cheapglasses123.com/tag/presecription-glasses
http://www.cheapglasses123.com/tag/progressive-eyeglasses
http://www.cheapglasses123.com/tag/progressive-glasses-online
http://www.cheapglasses123.com/tag/reading-glasses

http://www.cheapglasses123.com/tag/eyeglasses-frames
http://www.cheapglasses123.com/tag/prescription-sunglasses
http://www.cheapglasses123.com/eyeglasses/glasses-frames
http://www.cheapglasses123.com/eyeglasses/glasses-online
http://www.cheapglasses123.com/eyeglasses/plastic-glasses
http://www.cheapglasses123.com/eyeglasses/prescription-glasses
http://www.cheapglasses123.com/eyeglasses/prescription-sunglasses
http://www.cheapglasses123.com/eyeglasses/progressive-glasses
http://www.cheapglasses123.com/eyeglasses/reading-glasses
http://www.cheapglasses123.com/eyeglasses/cheap-glasses
http://www.cheapglasses123.com/eyeglasses/cheap-eyeglasses
http://www.cheapglasses123.com/eyeglasses/designer-glasses
http://www.cheapglasses123.com/eyeglasses/eyeglass-frames

http://www.cheapglasses123.com/bifocal-glasses
http://www.cheapglasses123.com/cheap-eyeglasses
http://www.cheapglasses123.com/cheap-glasses
http://www.cheapglasses123.com/discount-eyeglasses
http://www.cheapglasses123.com/discount-glasses
http://www.cheapglasses123.com/eyeglasses
http://www.cheapglasses123.com/prescription-eyeglasses
http://www.cheapglasses123.com/prescription-glasses
http://www.cheapglasses123.com/prescription-sunglasses
http://www.cheapglasses123.com/progressive-glasses
http://www.cheapglasses123.com/sunglasses

http://forums.glassesadvisor.com
http://www.wordpublish.org/
http://www.glasses123.net/
http://www.glasses123.net/forums/
http://www.adulthappy.com
http://www.atb.name
http://www.adulthappy.net
http://www.adsensepublish.com
http://www.aauu.net

Reply
Comments Page 1 of 1





AnandTech.com Blog Categories
All categories
Anand's Macdates
Anand's Theater Construction
Anand's Updates
Cases and Power Supplies
CeBIT 2008
CES 2008
Computex 2009
Derek Decanted
Eddie's Got Game
Gary's First Looks
IT Computing general
Jarred's Musings
Kris's Corner
Raja's Ramblings
Rob's Experiences...
Ryan's Ramblings
Virtualization
What's New with Wes
Blank
Blank

Blank

Latest news by
DailyTech

 November 20, 2009

Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank

 November 19, 2009

Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank


more Blogs Discussions



pipeboost
Copyright © 1997-2009 AnandTech, Inc. All rights reserved. Terms, Conditions and Privacy Information.
Click Here for Advertising Information